Advertisement

Social Assessment in the Design Phase of Automotive Component Using the Product Social Impact Assessment Method

  • Laura ZanchiEmail author
  • Alessandra Zamagni
  • Silvia Maltese
  • Rubina Riccomagno
  • Massimo Delogu
Chapter
  • 140 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science book series (BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL)

Abstract

This paper shows one of the first example of S-LCA application in the automotive sector by means of the Product Social Impact Assessment method, developed by the Roundtable for the Product Social Metrics. The case study concerns a vehicle component. The main companies involved in the production stage have been engaged in the data collection; therefore, this work gave the opportunity to test the method usability as a supporting tool in the design phase. The main outcomes concern: (i) product system and system boundaries definition; (ii) data collection feasibility; (iii) handbook steps applicability. The PSIA quantitative approach proved to be practicable, even if opportunities for improvements have been identified especially regarding the social indicators granularity in terms of their capability to reflect the differences among the alternative design options from a social point of view. This is a decisive aspect to enhance the assessment of social impacts during the product design phase.

References

  1. 1.
    Koplin J, Seuring S, Mesterharm M. Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry – the case of the Volkswagen AG. J Clean Prod. 2007;15:1053–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zanchi L, Delogu M, Zamagni A, Pierini M. Analysis of the main elements affecting social LCA applications: challenges for the automotive sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(3):519–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1176-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Traverso M, Bell L, Saling P, Fontes J. Towards social life cycle assessment: a quantitative product social impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(3):597–606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1168-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tarne P, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M. Review of life cycle sustainability assessment and potential for its adoption at an automotive company. Sustainability. 2017;9:670.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Delogu M, Maltese S, Del Pero F, Zanchi L, Pierini M, Bonoli A. Challenges for modelling and integrating environmental performances in concept design: the case of an automotive component lightweighting. Int J Sustain Eng. 2018;11:135–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2017.1420110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maltese S, Delogu M, Zanchi L, Bonoli A. Application of Design for Environment principles combined with LCA methodology on automotive product process development: the case study of a crossmember. Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2017, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 68, 2017.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Delogu M, Zanchi L, Maltese S, Bonoli A, Pierini M. Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of a lightweight solution for an automotive component: a comparison between talc-filled and hollow glass microspheres-reinforced polymer composites. J Clean Prod. 2016;139:548–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delogu M, Zanchi L, Dattilo CA, Maltese S, Riccomagno R, Pierini M. Take-home messages from the applications of life cycle assessment on lightweight automotive components, SAE international, CO2 reduction for transportation systems conference Turin, Italy, 6–7-8 June 2018.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fontes J, Bolhuis A, Bogaers K, Saling P, van Gelder R, Traverso M, Tarne P, Das Gupta J, Morris D, Woodyard D, Bell L, van der Merwe R, Kimm N, Santamaria C, Laubscher M, Jacobs M, Challis D, Alvarado C, Duclaux C, Slaoui Y, Culley H, Zinck S, Stermann R, Carteron E, Gupta A, Nilsson S, Gaasbeek A, Goedkoop M, Evitts S. Handbook for product social impact assessment version 3.0. 2016. http://product-social-impact-assessment.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Handbook-for-Product-Social-Impact-Assessment.pdf. (Accessed 16.05.2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fontes J, Tarne P, Traverso M, Bernstein P. Product social impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(3):547–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1125-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products, Paris, 2009.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    United Nations Environment Programme and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, The methodological sheets for sub-categories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA). UNEP-SETAC life-cycle initiative, Paris, France, 2013.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garrido SR, Parent J, Beaulieu L, Revéret J-P. A literature review of type I S-LCA—making the logic underlying methodological choices explicit. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2018;23(3):432–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1067-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Zanchi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alessandra Zamagni
    • 1
  • Silvia Maltese
    • 2
    • 3
  • Rubina Riccomagno
    • 4
  • Massimo Delogu
    • 5
  1. 1.Ecoinnovazione srl, Spin-off ENEABolognaItaly
  2. 2.Magneti Marelli S.p.A. – Powertrain DivisionBolognaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials EngineeringUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  4. 4.Magneti Marelli Spa, EHS Central TeamCorbettaItaly
  5. 5.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations