Skip to main content

Startups as a Challenge for Management and Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Startups in Transition Economies
  • 3263 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a new philosophy of startup management—Lean Startup—in the context of management culture. Particular attention is placed on the development of management in Poland, including historical and social factors. The technocratic spirit of large manufacturing industry and the tradition of family businesses and small-scale artisan production clash with the startup culture which is open, egalitarian, and dynamic, but also nomadic and volatile. These attributes of startup culture are a source of its strength and potential, but they can be a barrier to its rapid adaptation in Poland and other countries with similar experiences. The second part of the chapter is devoted to education for startups in the context of education in the field of management and entrepreneurship. The chapter also presents examples of the author’s own courses programmes educating for startup entrepreneurship based on her knowledge and experience conducting classes and training for students and entrepreneurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    POSDCORB: Planning, Organizing, Staffing, Directing, Co-ordinating, Reporting, Budgeting.

  2. 2.

    Act of 23 December 1988 on economic activity. Dz.U. 1988 No. 41 item 324.

  3. 3.

    So far, there is no satisfactory Polish translation for this term, so the original term will be used: “Lean Startup”.

  4. 4.

    In particular, they are studying a course in ESADE which combines single afternoon sessions, week-long sessions, and daily reflection in the form of a “journal”, and a course at Boston College, titled Leadership for Change which combines full-day sessions, team learning, and individual reflection.

  5. 5.

    Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education2012, Enterprise and entrepreneurship education: guidance for UK higher education providers, QAA, Gloucester, viewed 06 Nov 2017.

  6. 6.

    WIPA: The WIPA initiative has evolved over time into the SEIPA programme: Education Network of Academic Innovative Entrepreneurship, a project with a greater range and recognition in the community connected to entrepreneurship education at universities in Poland.

  7. 7.

    More on this matter in Skala, A. (2015).

  8. 8.

    The materials can be downloaded under a Creative Commons licence from the company website owned by Alexander Osterwalder: www.strategyzer.com

  9. 9.

    More on this subject in Cieślik and Skala (2016).

  10. 10.

    The survey asked about the sources of knowledge that entrepreneurs use and the degree of their influence on the activities they undertake. Formal sources of knowledge and educational institutions were mentioned in the last places among the obtained answers (Beauchamp et al. 2017).

References

  • Ács, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (2010). Knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ács Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2017). Institutions, entrepreneurship and growth: The role of national entrepreneurial ecosystems. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2912453. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.

  • Adamczyk, M. (2016). Koncepcje zarządzania innowacjami na przykładzie krakowskich start-upów technologicznych. Przegląd Organizacji, 7, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. M., Giacalone, R. A., & Jurkiewicz, C. L. (2007). On the relationship of hope and gratitude to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andries, P., Debackere, K., & Looy, B. (2013). Simultaneous experimentation as a learning strategy: Business model development under uncertainty. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(4), 288–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbaugh, J. B., Fornaciari, C., & Hwang, A. (2014). Development patterns in business and management education research: Knowledge-based or knower-based? Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), 1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, J. B., Kannan, V. R., & Stephens, A. A. (2008). Cultivating systemic thinking in the next generation of business leaders. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business & Society, 41(3), 292–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, R., Ahuvia, A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2012). Brand love. Journal of Marketing, 76(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., & Kunz, T. (2006). Płynna nowoczesność. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, M., Kowalczyk, A., & Skala, A. (2017). Polish startups. Report 2017. Warsaw: Startup Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, A., Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. Z., & Brem, A. (2015). Beyond traditional developmental models: A fresh perspective on entrepreneurial new venture creation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 7(2), 152–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. P., Connerley, M. L., & Cocchiara, F. K. (2009). The case for mandatory diversity education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 597–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Białek-Jaworska A., Gabryelczyk R., & Pugacewicz A. (2015). Czy komercjalizacja wyników badań nauko- wych wpływa na dojrzałość modelu biznesowego? Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 16(11), issue 2: Zarządzanie – nowe perspektywy: heurystyczne podejście do innowacyjności.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. L. (1979). The job generation process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. L. (1987). Job creation in America: How our smallest companies put the most people to work. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bis, J. (2013). Innowacyjny model biznesowy – sposób na zwiększenie przewagi konkurencyjnej. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 14(13), issue 2: Modele biznesowe, 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. (2003). The four steps to the epiphany: Successful strategies for products that win. Pescadero: K&S Ranch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. (2016). Why visionary CEOs never have visionary successors. Harvard Business Review. http://hbr.org/2016/10/why-visionary-ceos-never-have-visionary-successors. Accessed 17 Jan 2017.

  • Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). Startup owner’s manual. Pescadero: K&S Ranch Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Błaszczak, A., & Ogonowska-Rejer, A. (2016). Przynajmniej dwóch na pięciu szefów czołowych przedsię- biorstw to absolwenci uczelni technicznych. Rzeczpospolita. online. http://www.rp.pl/Sciezki%2D%2Dkariery/312069882-Najwiekszymi- rmami-w-Polsce-najczesciej-zarzadzaja-inzynierowie.html. Accessed 6 Dec 2016.

  • Block, Z., & Stumpf, S. A. (1992). Entrepreneurship education research: Experience and challenge. In D. L. Sexton & J. D. Kasarda (Eds.), The state of the art of entrepreneurship. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratnicki, M., Dyduch, W., & Gabryś, B. J. (2002). Mity przedsiębiorczości w polskich organizacjach: diagnoza i mechanizmy ożywiania potencjału przedsiębiorczości. In P. Wachowiak, M. Dąbrowski, & B. Majewski (Eds.), Kształtowanie postaw przedsiębiorczych a edukacja ekonomiczna, materiały konferencyjne. Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, T. H., Dorf, R. C., & Nelson, A. J. (2011). Technology ventures: From idea to enterprise (Vol. 3). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., & Marody, M. (2013). Społeczeństwo sieci. Warszawa: WN PWN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charney, A., & Libecap, G. D. (2000). The impact of entrepreneurship education: An evaluation of the Berger Entrepreneurship Program at the University of Arizona, 1985–1999. Final report. https://ebr.eller.arizona.edu/sites/ebr/les/docs/research-studies/impact-of-entrepreneurship-education-1985-1999.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2018.

  • Chesbrough, H. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 354–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C., & Raynor, M. (2013). The innovator’s solution: Creating and sustaining successful growth. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrostowski, A., & Jemielniak, D. (2008). Action Research w teorii organizacji i zarządzania. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 1, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, J. (2006). Przedsiębiorczość dla ambitnych: jak uruchomić własny biznes. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, J. (2008). Kształcenie w zakresie przedsiębiorczości na poziomie akademickim. http://www.fun-dacja.edu.pl/przedsiebiorczosc/_referaty/sesja_IIa/5. pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.

  • Cieślik, J. (2014a). Przedsiębiorczość, polityka, rozwój. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademickie Sedno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, J. (2014b). Iluzje innowacyjnej przedsiębiorczości. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 3, 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, J. (2015). Miejsce przedsiębiorczości w strukturze nauk o zarządzaniu. Kwartalnik nauk o przedsiębiorstwie, 2, 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, J. (2017). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Enhancing its contribution to socio-economic development. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, J., & Skala, A. (2016). Nowe tendencje w kształceniu innowacyjnych przedsiębiorców. Horyzonty Wychowania, 15(34), 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieślik, J., Matusiak, K. B., Guliński, J., & Skala-Poźniak, A. (2011). Edukacja dla przedsiębiorczości akademickiej. Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., Berti, S., & Jarvis, W. P. (2017). Future in the past: A philosophical reflection on the prospects of management. In A. Wilkinson, S. J. Armstrong, & M. Lounsbury (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collis, D. (2016). Lean strategy. Harvard Business Review, 3, 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B., & Vlaskovits, P. (2010). The entrepreneur’s guide to customer development. Norwich: Bertrams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 373–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, J., & Watts, G. (2000). Learning by doing – An exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 6(3), 104–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czakon, W. (2014). Kryteria oceny rygoru metodologicznego badań w naukach o zarządzaniu. Organization and Management, 1(161), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czakon, W. (2015). Od humanizmu do kariery. Zmiany uniwersytetu dziś i jutro. In K. Jędralska & J. Bernais (Eds.), Uniwersytet w perspektywie kształcenia przez całe życie (pp. 103–112). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech, A. (2004). Adamiecki, Hauswald, Rothert: w 100-lecie nauki organizacji i zarządzania w Polsce. Katowice: Prace Naukowe/Akademia Ekonomiczna w Katowicach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daszkiewicz, N. (2013). Education as a stimulating factor for entrepreneurship development. Horyzonty Wychowania, 13(26), 165–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, F. R., David, M. E., & David, F. R. (2011). What are business schools doing for business today? Business Horizons, 54(1), 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., Segers, M., van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13, 533–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drzewiecki, J. (2013). Model biznesu jako narzędzie zarządzania strategicznego: zastosowanie, dylematy i wyzwania. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 14(13), issue 2: Modele biznesowe, 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drzewiecki, J. (2016). Zmienność modelu biznesowego w kontekście innowacyjności organizacji. Management Forum, 1(4), 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Networks of innovation: Science, technology and development in the triple helix era. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 1(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A. (2005). Evaluation of entrepreneurship education: Behavior performing or intention increasing? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 2(1), 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Essay on the nature of entrepreneurship education. In International Conference Entrepreneurship in United Europe-Challenges and Opportunities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programs: A new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: Building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C. (2012). Student engagement: Selection, management, and outcomes. In B. Holtom & E. Dierdor (Eds.), Disrupt or be disrupted: A blueprint for change in management education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, F., Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2005). Economics language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 8–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, D. L., & Brem, A. (2017). How do entrepreneurs think they create value? A scientific reflection of Eric Ries’ Lean Startup approach. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furr, N., & Ahlstrom, P. (2011). Nail it then scale it: The entrepreneur’s guide to creating and managing breakthrough innovation. Lexington: NISI Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garavan, T. N., & O’Cinneide, B. (1994). Entrepreneurship education and training programmes: A review and evaluation – Part 1. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(8), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1990). What are we talking about when we talk about entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., Sandmeier, P., & Wecht, C. (2006). Extreme customer innovation in the front-end: Learning from a new software paradigm. International Journal of Technology Management, 33(1), 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaweł, A. (2011). Kształcenie uniwersyteckie jako czynnik wpływający na przedsiębiorczość. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, 215, 71–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 73–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glinka, B. (2008). Kulturowe uwarunkowania przedsiębiorczości. Warszawa: PWE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glinka, B., & Kostera, M. (red.). (2012). Nowe kierunki w organizacji i zarządzaniu. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V., & Ramamurti, R. (2011). Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal, 1(3–4), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hägg, G., & Kurczewska, A. (2016). Connecting the dots: A discussion on key concepts in contemporary entrepreneurship education. Education + Training, 58(7/8), 700–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, J., Tellis, G., & Griffn, A. (2006). Research on innovation: A review and agenda for ‘marketing science’. Marketing Science, 25(6), 687–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hébert, R. F., & Link, A. N. (1989). In search of the meaning of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 1(1), 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrekson, M., & Sanandaji, T. (2014). Small business activity does not measure entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(5), 1760–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C., Hill, F., & Leitch, C. (2005a). Entrepreneurship education and training: Can entrepreneurship be taught? Part I. Education + Training, 47(2), 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C., Hill, F., & Leitch, C. (2005b). Entrepreneurship education and training: Can entrepreneurship be taught? Part II. Education + Training, 47(3), 158–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlupic, V. (2014). The management shift: How to harness the power of people and transform your organization for sustainable success. London: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hlupic, V. (2017). The frogs in hot water. Dialog Review. http://dialoguereview.com/frogs-hot-water/. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.

  • Honig, B. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurana, R., & Penrice, D. (2011). Business education: The American trajectory. In M. Morsing & A. S. Rovira (Eds.), Business schools and their contribution to society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Can business schools meet the challenge? Education + Training, 46(8/9), 510–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korpysa, J. (2016). Przedsiębiorczość jako proces tworzenia i funkcjonowania akademickich mikroprzedsiębiorstw spin-o w Polsce. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosała, M. (2016). Edukacja przedsiębiorczości – analiza tendencji, metod i narzędzi w zakresie nauczania przedsiębiorczości w środowisku akademickim. Horyzonty Wychowania, 15(34), 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koźmiński, A. K. (2011). The new revolution in management education? Master of Business Administration, 19(4), 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koźmiński, A. K. (2014). Wkład zarządzania we wzrost gospodarczy. In G. W. Kołodko (Ed.), Zarządzanie i polityka gospodarcza dla rozwoju. Warszawa: Poltext.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckertz, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship education – Status quo and prospective developments. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 16, 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckertz, A. (2013). What’s hot in entrepreneurship research in 2013? (The 1st of a series of annual trend surveys). Hohenheim: Universität Hohenheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckertz, A., & Prochotta, A. (2018). What’s hot in entrepreneurship research in 2018? (Hohenheim entrepreneurship research brief). Hohenheim: Universität Hohenheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurczewska, A. (2012). W jaki sposób myślą przedsiębiorcy? – czyli: jeśli mogę kontrolować przyszłość, nie muszę jej przewidywać”. E-mentor, 5(47). http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/47/id/965. Accessed 30 Oct 2017.

  • Kurczewska, A. (2013). Przedsiębiorczość jako proces współoddziaływania sposobności i intencji przedsiębiorczych. Warszawa: PWE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łada, M. (2016). Big Data wyzwaniem dla zarządzania i rachunkowości. Studia Ekonomiczne, 299, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, T. (2016, March). The limits of the lean startup method. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, T., Lyytinen, K., & Gemmell, R. (2015). How customer interaction and experimentation advance new venture concepts in a cleantech accelerator. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 11415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lago, M. D., Corti, D., & Pedrazzoli, P. (2016). Turning a lean business model into a successful Start-up in the wearable technology sector: The case of Clara Swiss Tech. In R. Rinaldi & R. Bandinelli (Eds.), Business models and ICT technologies for the fashion supply chain (pp. 111–122). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, J. E., Mollov, A., Pearlmutter, M., Singh, S., & Bygrave, W. D. (2007). Pre-start-up formal business plans and post-start-up performance: A study of 116 new ventures. Venture Capital, 9(4), 237–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latusek-Jurczak, D., & Prystupa-Rządca, K. (2015). Wykorzystanie profesjonalnych studiów przypadków w dydaktyce zarządzania. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 4, 191–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F. (2007). The role of entrepreneurship education in the entrepreneurial process. In A. Fayolle (Ed.), Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education (pp. 230–247). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlay, H. (2005). Entrepreneurship education in UK business schools: Conceptual, contextual and policy considerations. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 12(4), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurya, A. (2012). Running lean: Iterate from plan A to a plan that works. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1995). Discovery driven planning, Wharton School. Philadelphia: Snider Entrepreneurial Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2009). Discovery-driven growth: A breakthrough process to reduce risk and seize opportunity. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKeown, J., Millman, C., Reddy, S. S., Smith, K., & Martin, L. M. (2006). Graduate entrepreneurship education in the United Kingdom. Education + Training, 48(8/9), 597–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, W. E., & Long, W. A. (1987). Entrepreneurship education in the nineties. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, J. J., Martin, B. C., & Kay, M. J. (2010). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the academy of management, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mwasalwiba, E. S. (2010). Entrepreneurship education: A review of its objectives, teaching methods, and impact indicators. Education + Training, 52(1), 20–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, J., Ledwith, A., & Perks, H. (2011). New product development best practice in SME and large organisations: Theory vs practice. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2), 227–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noga, B., & Noga, M. (2016). Edukacja ekonomiczna społeczeństwa a edukacja przedsiębiorczości. Studia i Prace WNEiZ US, 44(2), 255–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A. (2004). The business model ontology: A proposition in a design science approach (PhD thesis). Université de Lausanne, Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales. http://www.acade-mia.edu/download/30373644/thebusiness-model-ontology.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2018.

  • Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, T., & Fernandez, O. (2014). The lean enterprise: How corporations can innovate like startups. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Picken, J. C. (2017a). From founder to CEO: The entrepreneur’s roadmap. Business Horizons, 60(1), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picken, J. C. (2017b). From startup to scalable enterprise: Laying the foundation. Business Horizons, 60(5), 587–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzykowski, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship in higher education – The case of Poland. In M. Dabić & M. Pietrzykowski (Eds.), Fostering education in entrepreneurship. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Bo- gucki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowska-Piątek, A. (2015). O trzeciej misji szkół wyższych w Polsce w świetle analizy ich misji i strategii rozwoju. Organizacja i Kierowanie, 3, 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piróg, D. (2015). Kompetencje z zakresu przedsiębiorczości: rozważania teoretyczne i ich ilustracje w ob- szarze szkolnictwa wyższego. Przedsiębiorczość-Edukacja, 11, 364–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popowska, M., & Nalepa, P. (2015). Lean Startup as a new way of managing technology ventures illustrated by the example of Wilcome App, Wydział Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego. Studia i Materiały, 2(19), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, B. (2014, April). How GE applies lean startup practices. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • PricewaterhouseCoopers. (2014). 17th annual global CEO survey: Fit for the future. https://www.pwc.com/ve/en/publicaciones/encuesta-global-anual-de-ceo.html. Accessed 20 Feb 2017.

  • Rachwał, T. (2006). Kształtowanie postaw przedsiębiorczych w edukacji szkolnej. In B. Muchacka (Ed.), Szkoła w nauce i praktyce edukacyjnej (Vol. 2). Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza Impuls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachwał, T., & Wach, K. (2016). Badanie intencji przedsiębiorczych młodego pokolenia: wyniki ankietyzacji wśród studentów kierunków nieekonomicznych. Przedsiębiorczość-Edukacja, 12, 405–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachwał, T., Kurek, S., & Boguś, M. (2016). Entrepreneurship education at secondary level in transition economies: A case of Poland. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (2000). Understanding entrepreneurial learning: A question of how? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 6(3), 145–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D., & Carswell, M. (2001). Towards a conceptual understanding of entrepreneurial learning. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 8(2), 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, D. B. (2011). Benefit corporations—A sustainable form of organization. Wake Forest Law Review, 46, 591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royce, W. W. (1987). Managing the development of large software systems: Concepts and techniques. In W. E. Riddle (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 328–338). Monterey: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, M. S., de Vasconcelos Gomes, L. A., da Silva, D. O., Bagno, R. B., & Freitas, S. L. T. U. (2015). Innovation processes: Which process for which project? Technovation, 35, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A. (2004). Educating entrepreneurship students about emotion and learning from failure. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 274–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skala, A. (2015). Przedsiębiorczość-wyzwanie dla edukacji. In A. Pustuła, J. Majczyk, & M. Darecki (Eds.), Przedsiębiorczość: jednostka, organizacja, kontekst. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skala, A. (2016). Badanie efektywności programów edukacyjnych w zakresie przedsiębiorczości na podstawie studium przypadku Politechniki Warszawskiej – komunikat z badań. Przedsiębiorczość-Edukacja, 12, 364–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, S. C., Loch, C. H., & Dong, J. (2009). Managing complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty in startup companies: An empirical study. Organization Science, 20(1), 118–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sońta-Drączkowska, E. (2016). Zarządzanie przedsięwzięciami innowacyjnymi – przegląd literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 11, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programs raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sułkowski, Ł. (2016). Kultura akademicka – koniec utopii? Łódź: Wydawnictwo Społecznej Akademii Nauk w Łodzi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, H., & Dunham, D. (1995). Critical assumption planning: A practical tool for managing business development risk. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(6), 413–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanev, S. (2017). Is there a lean future for global startups? Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Oxford handbook of management. (2017). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S. (1998). Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Science, 44(6), 743–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S. (2003). Experimentation matters: Unlocking the potential of new technologies for innovation. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzcieliński, S. (2011). Przedsiębiorstwo zwinne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbaniec, M. (2014). Współczesne wyzwania edukacji na rzecz przedsiębiorczości w szkolnictwie wyższym. Horyzonty Wychowania, 13(26), 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Weele, M. A., Steinz H. J., & van Rijnsoever, F. J. (2014). Start-ups down under: How start-up communities facilitate Australian entrepreneurship. In Paper to be presented at the DRUID Conference, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanevenhoven, J. (2013). Advances and challenges in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 466–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesper, K. H., & Gartner, W. B. (1997). Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5), 403–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viale, R., & Etzkowitz, H. (2005, May 18–21). Third academic revolution: Polyvalent knowledge; the DNA of the triple helix. 5th Triple Helix Conference theme paper, Turin.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Graevenitz, G., Harho, D., & Weber, R. (2010). The effects of entrepreneurship education. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 76(1), 90–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wach, K. (2007). Kształtowanie postaw przedsiębiorczych w programach nauczania: stan obecny i proponowane kierunki zmian. In P. Wachowiak, M. Dąbrowski, & B. Majewski (Eds.), Kształtowanie postaw przedsiębiorczych a edukacja ekonomiczna. Warszawa: Fundacja Promocji i Akredytacji Kierunków Ekonomicznych.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wach, K. (2013). Edukacja na rzecz przedsiębiorczości wobec współczesnych wyzwań cywilizacyjno-gospodarczych. Przedsiębiorczość-Edukacja, 9, 246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wach, K. (2014a). Edytorial: Przedsiębiorczy uniwersytet. Horyzonty Wychowania, 13(28), 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wach, K. (2014b). Edukacja dla przedsiębiorczości: pomiędzy przedsiębiorczą pedagogiką a edukacją ekonomiczną i biznesową. Horyzonty Wychowania, 13(28), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & Lozano, J. M. (2013). Developing more holistic management education: Lessons learned from two programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Malhotra, D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 643–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, N. (2003). Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organization Science, 14(2), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, K. M., Dickson, P., & Solomon, G. (2006). Entrepreneurship and education: What is known and not known about the links between education and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Administration, 1(1), 113–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodecka-Hyjek, A. (2013). Paradygmat przedsiębiorczości w perspektywie wybranych reprezentantów klasycznej szkoły organizacji i zarządzania. Studia i Materiały. Miscellanea Oeconomicae, 2, 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2007). Banker to the poor. New Delhi: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawiła-Niedźwiecki, J. (2014). Propozycja strukturalizacji problematyki zrównoważonego zarządzania. In A. Stabryła & T. Małkus (Eds.), Strategie zarządzania organizacjami w społeczeństwie informacyjnym. Mfiles.pl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziębicki, B. (2014). Lean Startup jako nowa koncepcja zwinnego zarządzania przedsięwzięciami biznesowymi w warunkach skrajnej niepewności. Marketing i Rynek, 5(CD), 736–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zioło, Z. (2013). Miejsce przedsiębiorczości w edukacji. Przedsiębiorczość-Edukacja, 8, 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Skala, A. (2019). Startups as a Challenge for Management and Education. In: Digital Startups in Transition Economies. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01500-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics