Skip to main content

An Innovative Technique for Estimating the Radius of Buried Cylindrical Targets Using GPR

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Remote Sensing and Geo Informatics Applications (CAJG 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation ((ASTI))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) data analysis provides quantitative information about the objects buried in a medium, such as their sizes or depths. This is achieved by studying the wave reflections caused by the electromagnetic contrasts in the medium. This paper proposed an innovative technique for the determination of the radius of a buried cylindrical object based on the fitting of selected reflected points in the GPR trace to a geometric model. The performances of this technique were evaluated using data generated by a GPR simulator, gprMax, which uses the Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method. Simulation results show that our technique can estimate the radius of the buried cylinder with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 0.5%. A comparative study of our technique with another one from the literature shows a higher accuracy of our technique with radius estimation carried out in simpler steps, reflecting its robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ardekani, M.R.M.: Off- and on-ground GPR techniques for field-scale soil moisture mapping. Geoderma 200–201, 55–66 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomez-Ortiz, D., Montesinos, F.G., Martin-Crespo, T., Solla, M., Arnoso, J., Velez, E.: Combination of geophysical prospecting techniques into areas of high protection value: Identification of shallow volcanic structures. J. Appl. Geophys. 109, 15–26 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, C.G., Zhao, Q., Huo, J.J., Chang, X.H., Ran, L.M.: Single Borehole radar for well logging in a limestone formation: experiments and simulations. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 21, 201–213 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2113/jeeg21.4.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arosio, D., Munda, S., Zanzi, L., Longoni, L., Papini, M.: GPR investigations to assess the state of damage of a concrete water tunnel. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. 17, 159–169 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2113/JEEG17.3.159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliveira, D.B., Vieira, D.A.G., Lisboa, A.C., Goulart, F.: A well posed inverse problem for automatic pavement parameter estimation based on GPR data. NDT E Int. 65, 22–27 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Solla, M., Asorey-Cacheda, R., Nunez-Nieto, X., Conde-Carnero, B.: Evaluation of historical bridges through recreation of GPR models with the FDTD algorithm. NDT E Int. 77, 19–27 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Olhoeft, G.R.: Maximizing the information return from ground penetrating radar. J. Appl. Geophys. 43, 175–187 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-9851(99)00057-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Qadi, I.L., Lahouar, S.: Measuring rebar cover depth in rigid pavements with ground-penetrating radar. Construction 1907, 81–85 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3141/1907-09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shihab, S.: Radius estimation for cylindrical objects detected by ground penetrating radar. Sens. Imaging 6, 151–166 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-005-0004-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, P., Guo, X.X., Muhammat, N., Wang, X.D.: Research on probing and predicting the diameter of an underground pipeline by GPR during an operation period. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 58, 99–108 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghozzi, R., Lahouar, S., Achmad Louis, S., Souani, C., Besbes, K.: Extraction of geometric parameters of underground tube using GPR. In: International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis (ICCAD), Hammamet-Tunisia (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/cadiag.2017.8075631

  12. Ghozzi, R., Lahouar, S., Souani, C.: The estimation of buried empty cylindrical tubes characteristics using GPR. In: Advanced Technologies for Signal & Image Processing (ATSIP’2018), Sousse, Tunisia (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/atsip.2018.8364486

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rim Ghozzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ghozzi, R., Lahouar, S., Souani, C. (2019). An Innovative Technique for Estimating the Radius of Buried Cylindrical Targets Using GPR. In: El-Askary, H., Lee, S., Heggy, E., Pradhan, B. (eds) Advances in Remote Sensing and Geo Informatics Applications. CAJG 2018. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01440-7_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics