Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

School Turnaround Policies and Practices in the US pp 53–72Cite as

Barriers to Turnaround

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 386 Accesses

Part of the book series: Education, Equity, Economy ((EEEC,volume 6))

Abstract

“The conventions of school contexts” (Griffin, 1995, p. 44) and school social conditions exert a dramatic influence on turnaround. As Rosenholtz (1989) concluded in her landmark volume on teacher work: “Teachers like members of most organizations, shape their beliefs and actions largely in conformance with the structures, policies, and traditions of the workday world around them” (pp. 2–3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Institutes for Research. (2011). School turnaround: A pocket guide.Reauthorizing ESEA: Making research relevant. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anrig, G. (2015). Lessons from School Improvement Grants that worked. New York, NY: The Century Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baroody, K. (2011). Turning around the nation’s lowest-performing schools: Five steps districts can take to improve their chances of success. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berends, M., Bodilly, S. J., & Kirby, S. N. (2002). Facing the challenges of whole-school reform: New American schools after a decade. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boles, K., & Troen, V. (1994). Teacher leadership in a professional development school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boles, K., & Troen, V. (1996). Teacher leaders and power: Achieving school reform from the classroom. In G. Moller & M. Katzenmeyer (Eds.), Every teacher as a leader: Realizing the potential of teacher leadership (pp. 41–62). San Francisco, NC: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, K. G., & McDowelle, J. O. (2000, May). Developing teacher leaders: Providing encouragement, opportunities, and support. NASSP Bulletin, 84(616), 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrispeels, J. H. (1992). Purposeful restructuring: Creating a culture for learning and achievement in elementary schools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. L., & Meloy, J. M. (1989). Renouncing bureaucracy: A democratic structure for leadership in schools. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. A. Moore (Eds.), Schooling for tomorrow: Directing reform to issues that count (pp. 272–294). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, M. (2013). Learning to lead school turnaround: The Mississippi LEADS professional development model. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(1), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the Great City Schools. (2015). School Improvement Grants: Progress report from America’s great city schools. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, M. (1997, May/June). Teacher leadership vs. school management: Flatten the hierarchies. Teacher Leadership, 70(5), 236–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, F., Kaagan, S. S., Ferguson, M., & Hann, L. (2002). Developing teacher leaders: How teacher leadership enhances school success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee, T. S. (2012). School turnarounds: Evidence from the 2009 Stimulus. Cambridge, MA: Program on Education Policy and Governance, Harvard University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G. A. (2001). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, M. (2000, April). Making meaning of teacher leadership in the implementation of a standards-based mathematics curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. L. (1994). Drift, detachment, and the need for teacher leadership. In D. R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Perspectives on the professional development of teachers (pp. 255–273). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, D. L. (2012). Tinkering and turnarounds: Understanding the contemporary campaign to improve low-performing schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 17(1–2), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F. (1987). Reform and the culture of authority in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 60–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S., & Floden, R. F. (1986). The cultures of teaching. In C. W. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 505–526). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, D., & Durrant, J. (2003a). Teacher leadership: Rationale, strategy, and impact. School Leadership & Management, 23(2), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, D., & Durrant, J. (2003b). Teacher-led development work: Guidance and support. London, UK: David Fulton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1994). Teacher leadership: A failure to conceptualize. In D. R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Perspectives on the professional development of teachers (pp. 241–254). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E., Norton, M. H., Good, D., & Levin, S. (2012). Philadelphia’s renaissance schools initiative: 18 month interim report. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Action.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, G. A. (1995, September). Influences of shared decision making on school and classroom activity: Conversations with five teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. P., Heilig, J. V., & Pazey, B. L. (2014). A nostrum of school reform? Turning around reconstituted urban Texas high schools. Urban Education, 49(2), 182–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A. W. (1990). Impacts of the school social unit on teacher authority during work redesign. American Educational Research Journal, 27(3), 503–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A. W. (1994, November). Creating teacher leadership roles. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(4), 472–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A. W. (1995). Reconceiving school leadership: Emergent view. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R., & Baptist, B. (1996). Developing teacher leaders: A state initiative. In G. Moller & M. Katzenmeyer (Eds.), Every teacher as a leader: Realizing the potential of teacher leadership (pp. 85–100). San Francisco, NC: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, E. A., & Steiner, L. (2003). Starting fresh: A new strategy for responding to chronically low performing schools. Chapel Hill, NC: Public Impact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heissel, J. A., & Ladd, H. F. (2016). School turnaround in North Carolina: A regression discontinuity analysis. Washington, DC: CALDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, D. A. (1994). The problem with power. In D. R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Perspectives on the professional development of teachers (pp. 287–297). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools. IES practice guide. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, G. A. (2003). Reconstitution—Three years later monitoring the effect of sanctions on Chicago high schools. Education and Urban Society, 35(3), 300–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M., Parrish, T., Hannan, S., Arellanes, M., & Shambaugh, L. (2011). Turnaround schools in California: Who are they and what strategies do they use? Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Educational Leadership. (2001). Leadership for student learning: Redefining the teacher as leader. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. L. (1998). Organizing for collaboration: A reconsideration of some basic organizing principles. In D. G. Pounder (Ed.), Restructuring schools for collaboration: Promises and pitfalls (pp. 9–25). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keedy, J. L. (1999). Examining teacher instructional leadership within the small group dynamics of collegial groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(7), 785–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killion, J. P. (1996). Moving beyond the school: Teacher leaders in the district office. In G. Moller & M. Katzenmeyer (Eds.), Every teacher as a leader: Realizing the potential of teacher leadership (pp. 63–84). San Francisco, NC: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2012a, April 15). What’s the payoff for $4.6 billion in School Improvement Grants? The Hechinger Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (2012b). Turnaround momentum still fragile. Education Week, 31(28), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kober, N., & Rentner, D. S. (2011). More to do, but less capacity to do it: States’ progress in implementing the Recovery Act education reforms. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, J. M., & Hassel, E. A. (2005). Turnarounds with new leaders and staff (Vol. 43). Washington, DC: The Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, T. J. (1995). Preparing teachers to be leaders: Barriers in the work-place. In M. J. O’Hair & S. J. Odell (Eds.), Educating teachers for leadership and change (pp. 243–256). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutash, J., Nico, E., Gorin, E., Rahmatullah, S., & Tallant, K. (2010). The school turnaround field guide. Boston, MA: Foundational Strategy Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachlan-Hache, J., Naik, M., & Casserly, M. (2012). The School Improvement Grant rollout in America’s great city schools: School Improvement Grants. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Floch, K. C., O’Day, J., Birman, B., Hurlburt, S., Nayfack, M., Halloran, C., …, & Hulsey, L. (2016). Case studies of schools receiving School Improvement Grants: Final report (NCEE 2016-4002). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers: Transforming their world and their work. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, A., Saxl, E. R., & Miles, M. B. (1988). Teacher leadership: Ideology and practice. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 148–166). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (1987). Teachers as colleagues. In V. Richardson-Koehler (Ed.), Educators’ handbook: A research perspective (pp. 491–518). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (1988). Assessing the prospects for teacher leadership. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 78–105). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (1990). The perspective of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1993). Introduction. Perspectives on cultures and contexts of teaching. In J. W. Little & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), Teachers’ work: Individuals, colleagues, and contexts (pp. 1–8). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malen, B., Croninger, R., Muncey, D., & Redmond-Jones, D. (2002). Reconstituting schools: “Testing” the “theory of action”. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manthei, J. (1992). The mentor teacher as leader: The motives, characteristics and needs of seventy-three experienced teachers who seek a new leadership role. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. A., Strunk, K. O., & Bush, S. (2013). Portfolio district reform meets school turnaround: Early implementation findings from the Los Angeles Public School Choice Initiative. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(4), 498–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, J. A., Strunk, K. O., Bush-Mecenas, S. C., & Huguet, A. (2014). The evolving role of parents in the Los Angeles Public School Choice Initiative. Educational Policy, 29(1), 51–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mass Insight. (2010). School turnaround models emerging turnaround strategies and results. Boston, MA: Mass Insight.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathis, W. J. (2009). NCLB’s ultimate restructuring alternatives: Do they improve the quality of education? Education Policy Research Unit. East Lansing, MI: The Great Lakes Center for Education Research & Practice.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinn, P. (2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, 26(1), 136–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMurrer, J. (2012a). Schools with federal improvement grants face challenges in replacing principals and teachers. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurrer, J. (2012b). Changing the school climate is the first step to reform in many schools with federal improvement grants. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurrer, J., & McIntosh, S. (2012). State implementation and perceptions of Title I School Improvement Grants under the Recovery Act: One year later. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, S. (2007). Easy way out. Education Next, 7(1), 52–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1975). Notes on the structure of educational organizations: Revised version. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. (1997, Fall). Teacher identity: A key to increased collaboration. Action in Teacher Education, 19(3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J., Beck, L., Crawford, M., Hodges, A., & McGaughy, C. L. (2001). The productive high school: Creating personalized academic communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, J., & Bitter, C. (2003). Evaluation study of the immediate intervention/underperforming schools program and the high achieving. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell, S. J. (1997). Preparing teachers for teacher leadership. Action in Teacher Education, 19(3), 120–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, C., & Reitzug, U. C. (2014). School turnaround fever: The Paradoxes of a historical practice promoted as a new reform. Urban Education, 49(1), 8–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellicer, L. O., & Anderson, L. W. (1995). A handbook for teacher leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, C. L., & Redding, S. (2011). Handbook on effective implementation of School Improvement Grants. Washington, DC: Center on Innovation & Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peurach, D. J., & Neumerski, C. M. (2015). Mixing metaphors: Building infrastructure for large scale school turnaround. Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 379–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picucci, A. C., Brownson, A., Kahlert, R., & Sobel, A. (2002a). Driven to succeed: High-performing, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Volume I: Cross-case analysis of high-performing, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Volume I. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center and the STAR Center at The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Picucci, A. C., Brownson, A., Kahlert, R., & Sobel, A. (2002b). Driven to succeed: High-performing, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Volume II: Case studies of high-performing, high-poverty, turnaround middle schools. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center and the STAR Center at The University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Printy, S. M. (2004). The professional impact of communities of practice. UCEA Review, 46(1), 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhim, L. M., & Redding, S. (2014). The state role in school turnaround: Emerging best practices. San Francisco, NC: WestEd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, L., Christianson, M., Angus, M., Rosenthal, E., & Wei, T. (2014). A focused look at rural schools receiving School Improvement Grants. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, L., Christianson, M. D., & Angus, M. H. (2015). Improvement efforts in rural schools: Experiences of nine schools receiving School Improvement Grants. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2), 194–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization of schools. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Davis, J., & Bottoms, G. (2012). Turnaround high school principals: Recruit, prepare and empower leaders of change. High schools that work. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (2008). A call to restructure restructuring: Lessons from the No Child Left behind Act in five states. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (2009). Improving low-performing schools: Lessons from five years of studying school restructuring Under No Child Left Behind. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. (2011a). Changing tires en route: Michigan rolls out millions in School Improvement Grants. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C., & McMurrer, J. (2015). Mission impossible? What states with large percentages of rural schools tell us about federal School Improvement Grants. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C., McMurrer, J., McIntosh, S., & Dibner, K. (2012). Opportunities and obstacles: Implementing stimulus-funded School Improvement Grants in Maryland, Michigan, and Idaho. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G. A. (2011b). Race to the Top: Reform efforts are under way and information sharing could be improved. Report to Congressional Committees. GAO-11-658. Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1991). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, D. Y., Gimbert, B., & Nolan, J. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership. Teachers College Record, 102(4), 779–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 53–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A. (1995). New perspectives on teacher leadership. The Elementary School Journal, 96(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A. (1996). Research on teacher leadership: Assessing the state of the art. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 521–592). Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A., & Brownlee-Conyers, J. (1992). Teacher leaders and their principals: Exploring the development of new working relationships. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28(2), 150–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A., Conley, S., & Marks, H. M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement. In J. Murphy (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 162–188). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smylie, M. A., & Hart, A. W. (1999). School leadership for teacher learning: A human and social capital development perspective. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 421–441). San Francisco, NC: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, L. (2009). Tough decisions: Closing persistently low-performing schools. Lincoln, IL: Academic Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M., Horejs, J., & Lomas, A. (1997, Fall). Commonalities and differences in teacher leadership at the elementary, middle, and high school level. Action in Teacher Education, 19(3), 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strunk, K. O., Marsh, J. A., Hashim, A., Bush, S., & Weinstein, T. (2012). The efficacy of the Los Angeles Unified School District Public School Choice Initiative for student achievement outcomes: Early evidence from the first year. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleiman, M., & Moore, R. (1997). Teachers’ roles revisited: Beyond classroom management. Paper presented at the ATE summer workshop, Tarpon Springs, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G., & Elmore, R. F. (1989). Making schools manageable. In J. Hannaway & R. Crowson (Eds.), The politics of reforming school administration. 1988 Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association (pp. 77–94). New York, NY: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanenbaum, C., Boyle, A., Graczewski, C., James-Burdumy, S., Dragoset, L., Hallgren, K., et al. (2015). State capacity to support school turnaround. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. L., Brown, K. M., Townsend, L. W., Henry, G. T., & Fortner, C. K. (2011). Turning around North Carolina’s lowest achieving schools (2006–2010). Chapel Hill, NC: Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasley, P. A. (1991). Teachers who lead: The rhetoric of reform and realities of practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976, March). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, T. (1995). Informed teacher leadership—The key to successful change in the middle level school. NASSP Bulletin, 79(567), 76–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (1993, March). The search for teacher leaders. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yatsko, S., Lake, R., Bowen, M., & Cooley Nelson, E. (2015). Federal School Improvement Grants (SIGs): How capacity and local conditions matter. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(1), 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yatsko, S., Lake, R., Nelson, E. C., & Bowen, M. (2012). Tinkering toward transformation: A look at federal School Improvement Grant implementation. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

    Joseph F. Murphy & Joshua F. Bleiberg

Authors
  1. Joseph F. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua F. Bleiberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Murphy, J.F., Bleiberg, J.F. (2019). Barriers to Turnaround. In: School Turnaround Policies and Practices in the US. Education, Equity, Economy, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01434-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01434-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01433-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01434-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation