Abstract
This chapter addresses different conceptions of the philosophy of mathematics. Classic positions become characterised as two-dimensional by concentrating on ontological and epistemological issues. As an alternative, a four-dimensional philosophy of mathematics become presented by expanding the philosophy to include a social and a ethical dimension as well.
The book has elaborated upon a four-dimensional philosophy of mathematics, but it does not make any claim about the adequate number of dimensions. Its main point has been to move beyond any two-dimensional philosophy, and in this move to establish human beings as having an all-important role in mathematics. By having opened a space for a humanised conception of mathematics—as opposed to the traditional anti-human conceptions—even more dimensions may emerge, as for instance an aesthetic and a political dimension. This leads to the more general question: What could it mean to move beyond the borders set by the Western tradition in the philosophy of mathematics? In fact, one comes to acknowledge the possibility that a philosophy of mathematics may stretch beyond the borders set by philosophy itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Detailed studies of the concept of the ontological is in terms of mathematical fictionalism found in Bueno (2009); the relevance of a Fregian philosophy of mathematics is addressed in Cook (2009); the concept of truth is explored in great details in Koellner (2009); and a philosophy of applied mathematics is approached in Pincock (2009). These particular studies demonstrate the depth that can be reached within a 2-dimnetional philosophy of mathematics. This depth can also be experienced in George and Velleman’s (2002) work, which investigates, for instance, logicism, intuitionism and finitism, the latter of which represented an extreme version of intuitionism.
- 3.
- 4.
See Almeide and Joseph (2009).
- 5.
- 6.
See Foucault (2000).
References
Almeida, D. F., & Joseph, G. G. (2009). Kerala mathematics and its possible transmission to Europe. In P. Ernest, B. Greer, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Critical issues in mathematics education (pp. 171–188). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Bernacerraf, P., & Putnam, H. (Eds.). (1964). Philosophy of mathematics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematical enculturation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bueno, O., & Linnebo, Ø. (Eds.). (2009). New waves in the philosophy of mathematics. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cook, R. T. (2009). New waves on an old beach: Fregian philosophy of mathematics today. In O. Bueno & Ø. Linnebo (Eds.), New waves in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 13–14). Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
D’Ambrosio, U. (2006). Ethnomathematics: Link between traditions and modernity. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
Davis, P. J., & Hersh, R. (1988). Descartes dream: The world according to mathematics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
Ernest, P. (1998). Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press..
Foucault, M. (2000). In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power. New York, NY: The New Press.
George, A., & Velleman, D. J. (2002). Philosophies of mathematics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Grabiner, J. V. (1986). Is mathematical truth time-dependent? In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New directions in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 201–213). Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
Hersh, R. (1998). What is mathematics, really? London, UK: Vintage.
Jaquette, D. (Ed.). (2002). Philosophy of mathematics: An anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Joseph, G. G. (2000). The crest of the peacock: The non-European roots of mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Koellner, P. (2009). Truth in mathematics: The question of pluralism. In O. Bueno & Ø. Linnebo (Eds.), New waves in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 80–116). Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Körner, S. (1968). The philosophy of mathematics. London, UK: Hutchinson University Library.
Pincock, C. (2009). Towards a philosophy of applied mathematics. In O. Bueno & Ø. Linnebo (Eds.), New waves in the philosophy of mathematics (pp. 173–194). Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Russell, B. (1978). Autobiography. London, UK: Unwin Paperbacks.
Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Shapiro, S. (2000). Thinking about mathematics: The philosophy of mathematics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ravn, O., Skovsmose, O. (2019). What is the Philosophy of Mathematics?. In: Connecting Humans to Equations . History of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01337-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01337-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01336-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01337-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)