Skip to main content

Testing the Level of Support for Police Militarization in a Sample of Police Officers, Police Executives, and Members of the U.S. Congress

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Police Militarization

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSPOLICI))

  • 333 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the second research question, whether significant differences exist in the level of support for PM among policymakers and practitioners. To assess if there was any significant variation in support for PM among the key stakeholders, a series of chi-square tests, ANOVAs, and the PSM quasi-experimental analytical technique were conducted to assess the relationship between participants’ professional positions and their support for PM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Austin, P. C. (2009). Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: Results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations. Biometrical Journal, 51, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. L., Swatt, M. L., Miller, J. M., Jennings, W. G., & Gover, A. R. (2012). The causal relationship between gang joining and violent victimization: A critical review and directions for future research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 490–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, W. G., Fox, B., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Inked into crime? An examination of the causal relationship between tattoos and life-course offending among males from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T. A., Wilson, T., Nagin, D. S., & Piquero, A. R. (2015). Evolutionary regression? Assessing the problem of hidden biases in criminal justice applications using propensity scores. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. H., & Jennings, W. G. (2016). A critical examination of “being black” in the juvenile justice system. Law and Human Behavior, 40, 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, G. (2006). Assessing the effect of race bias in post-traffic stop outcomes using propensity scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational studies. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turner, F.W., Fox, B. (2018). Testing the Level of Support for Police Militarization in a Sample of Police Officers, Police Executives, and Members of the U.S. Congress. In: Police Militarization. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01282-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01282-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01281-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01282-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics