Abstract
According to the Swedish curriculum, problem-solving is to be part of mathematics teaching from preschool continuing throughout all grades in school. However, little is known about young students’ feelings towards problem-solving tasks. This paper reports on an educational design research study investigating the potential in teaching problem-solving in preschool classes (6-year-olds). Two examples are presented showing how the students evaluate their feelings towards the problem-solving tasks they have been working on. The results show that understanding a task from the beginning or being able to solve it quickly are not necessary prerequisites for young students to experience enjoyment when working with the tasks. Quite the opposite, the majority of the students evaluated the tasks as fun and accessible, even though their initial solutions were often incorrect and they had to struggle a lot to solve the problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass & Pfeiffer. http://ncm.gu.se/kangaru
Boesen, J., Helenius, O., Bergqvist, E., Bergqvist, T., Lithner, J., Palm, T., et al. (2014). Developing mathematical competence: From the intended to the enacted curriculum. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33(1), 72–87.
Brown, R. (2017). Using collective argumentation to engage students in a primary mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 183–199.
Cai, J. (2010). Commentary on problem solving heuristics, affect, and discrete mathematics: A representational discussion. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 251–258). Dordrecht: Springer.
Carlson, M. (1999). The mathematical behavior of six successful mathematics graduate students: Influences leading to mathematical success. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(3), 237–258.
Chapman, E. (2003). Development and validation of a brief mathematics attitude scale for primary-aged students. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4(2), 63–73.
Claessens, A., Engel, M., & Curran, C. F. (2014). Academic content, student learning, and the persistence of preschool effects. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 403–434.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2016). Math, science, and technology in the early grades. The Future of Children, 26(2), 75–94.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1989). Young children’s emotional acts while engaged in mathematical problem solving. In D. B. McLeod & V. M. Adams (Eds.), Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective (pp. 117–148). New York: Springer.
Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., & Schweingruber, H. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Research Council of the National Academics.
Csapó, B., & Funke, J. (Eds.). (2017). The nature of problem solving. Using research to inspire 21st century learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Debellis, V. A., & Goldin, G. A. (2006). Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 131–147.
Dowker, A., Bennet, K., & Smith, L. (2012). Attitudes to mathematics in primary school children. Child Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/124939
Hannula, M. S. (2016). Introduction, attitudes, beliefs, motivation, and identity in mathematics education. In G. A. Goldin, M. S. Hannula, E. Heyd-Metzuyanim, A. Jansen, R. Kaasila, S. Lutovac, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Attitudes, beliefs, motivation and identity in mathematics education: An overview of the field and future directions (p. 1). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. (2007). Problem solving and modelling. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–799). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Information Age Publishing.
Mason, J., & Johnston-Wilder, S. (2006). Designing and using mathematical tasks. St. Albans, UK: Tarquin.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London: Routledge.
National Agency for Education. (2011). Curriculum for the primary school, preschool class and leisure time center 2011. Stockholm: National Agency for Education.
Op’t Eynde, P., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2001). “What to learn from what we feel?”: The role of students’ emotions in the mathematics classroom. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 149–167). (Advances in learning and instruction series). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
Palmér, H., & van Bommel, J. (2016). Exploring the role of representations when young children solve a combinatorial task. In J. Häggström, E. Norén, J. van Bommel, J. Sayers, O. Helenius, & Y. Liljekvist (Eds.), ICT in mathematics education: The future and the realities. Proceedings of MADIF 10, The tenth research seminar of the Swedish Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Karlstad, 26–27 Jan 2016. ISBN: 978-91-984024-0-7.
Perry, B., & Dockett, S. (2008). Young children’s access to powerful mathematical ideas. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 75–108). New York: Routledge.
Pinxten, M., Marsh, H. W., De Fraine, B., Van Den Noortgate, W., & Van Damme, J. (2013). Enjoying mathematics or feeling competent in mathematics? Reciprocal effects on mathematics achievement and perceived math effort expenditure. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12028
Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 165–197). New York: Macmillan.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press.
Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2014). 5 Practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Swedish Research Council. (2011). God Forskningssed [Good custom in research]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
van Bommel, J., & Palmér, H. (2016). Young children exploring probability: With focus on their documentations. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 21(4), 95–114.
Wyndhamn, J., Riesbeck, E., & Schoultz, J. (2000). Problemlösning som metafor och praktik [Problem solving as a metaphor and practice]. Institutionen för tillämpad lärarkunskap: Linköpings Universitet.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palmér, H., van Bommel, J. (2018). Young Students’ Feelings Towards Problem-Solving Tasks: What Does “Success” Imply?. In: Rott, B., Törner, G., Peters-Dasdemir, J., Möller, A., Safrudiannur (eds) Views and Beliefs in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01273-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01273-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01272-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01273-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)