Advertisement

Affect as a System: The Case of Sara

  • Peter LiljedahlEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Research in the affective domain has often been restricted to focused attention on a single affective variable. This is ironic given that we know that affective variables tend to cluster. Perhaps the reason for this is that we lack theories for thinking about affective clusters. In this paper I use Green’s theory of a belief cluster (1971) as the foundation for looking at a new construct—the affect cluster—and how it functions in an experience-rich environment. This proves to be a useful construct in explaining the case of Sara, a girl whose affect around mathematics has been completely changed.

Keywords

Beliefs Belief systems Affect Affect systems Changes in affect 

References

  1. Bánáthy, B. (1992). A systems view of education. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Bertalanffy, L. V. (1974). Perspectives on general systems theory—scientific and philosophical studies. New York, NY: Braziller.Google Scholar
  3. Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and modern systems theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structures and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 177–194). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Clandinin, D. J. (1992). Narrative and story in teacher education. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching from classroom to reflection (pp. 124–137). Bristol, PA: Falmer.Google Scholar
  6. Green, T. F. (1971). The activities of teaching. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.Google Scholar
  7. Hammond, D. (2003). The science of synthesis. Colorado: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  8. Liljedahl, P. (2010). The four purposes of assessment. Vector, 2010(2), 4–12.Google Scholar
  9. Liljedahl, P. (2014). The affordances of using visibly random groups in a mathematics classroom. In Y. Li, E. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 127–144). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Liljedahl, P. (2016a). Building thinking classrooms: Conditions for problem solving. In P. Felmer, J. Kilpatrick, & E. Pekhonen (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems: Advances and new perspectives. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liljedahl, P. (2016b). Flow: A framework for discussing teaching. In C. Csíkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitányi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 3, pp. 203–210). Szeged, Hungary: PME.Google Scholar
  12. Liljedahl, P. (2017). Relationship between proxies for learning and mathematics teachers’ views. In H. Palmér & J. Skott (Eds.), Students and teachers values, attitudes, feelings and beliefs in maths classrooms. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Liljedahl, P. (in press a). Building thinking classrooms. In A. Kajander, J. Holm, & E. Chernoff (Eds.), Teaching and learning secondary school mathematics: Canadian perspectives in an international context. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Liljedahl, P. (in press b). On the edges of flow: Student problem solving behaviour. In S. Carreira, N. Amado, & K. Jones (Eds.), Broadening the scope of research on mathematical problem solving: A focus on technology, creativity and affect. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Liljedahl, P., Rolka, K., & Rösken, B. (2007). Affecting affect: The re-education of preservice teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning and teaching. In M. Strutchens & W. Martin (Eds.), 69TH NCTM yearbook—the learning of mathematics (pp. 319–330). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  16. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap; best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Yackel, E., & Rasmussen, C. (2002). Beliefs and norms in the mathematics classroom. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Tӧrner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 313–330). London: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations