Advertisement

How to Understand Changes in Novice Mathematics Teachers’ Talk About Good Mathematics Teaching?

  • Hanna PalmérEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This paper focuses on how novice primary-school mathematics teachers talk about (good) mathematics teaching in general and mathematics textbooks in particular at the time of their graduation from university and a year later. The changes in their talk are discussed first in terms of beliefs research and second from a participatory perspective on identity formation. A comparison of findings with the two approaches shows that what beliefs research often explains as changes in belief, inconsistency, or hidden beliefs can be understood as identity formation in communities of practice from a participatory perspective.

Keywords

Novice mathematics teachers Primary school Mathematics textbooks Identity Communities of practice 

References

  1. Aspers, P. (2007). Etnografiska metoder [Ethnographic methods]. Malmö: Liber AB.Google Scholar
  2. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cortazzi, M. (2001). Narrative analysis in ethnography. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 384–394). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill, H. C., Sleep, L., Lewis, J. M., & Ball, D. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts? In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111–156). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Information Age.Google Scholar
  7. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Charlotte, NC: Author & Information Age.Google Scholar
  8. Neuman, J., Hemmi, K., Ryve, A., & Wiberg, M. (2014). Mathematics textbooks’ impact on classroom instruction: Examining the views of 278 Swedish teachers. In H. Silfverberg, T. Kärki, & M. S. Hannula (Eds.), Nordic research in mathematics education: Proceedings of NORMA14, Turku, June 3–6, 2014. Finnish Research Association for Subject Didactics: Turku, Finland.Google Scholar
  9. Palmér, H. (2013). To become—or not to become—a primary school mathematics teacher: A study of novice teachers’ professional identity development (Doctoral dissertation). Linnaeus University Dissertations no. 130/2013. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Phillip, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and affect. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257–315). Charlotte, NC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics & Information Age.Google Scholar
  11. Ponte, J. P., & Chapman, O. (2008). Preservice mathematics teachers’ knowledge and development. In L. D. English, M. B. Bussi, G. A. Jones, R. A. Lesh, B. Sriraman, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 223–261). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Sfard, A. (2006). Participationist discourse on mathematics learning. In J. Maasz & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), New mathematics education research and practice (pp. 153–170). Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  13. Skott, J. (2015). Towards a participatory approach to ʻbeliefs’ in mathematics education. In B. Pepin & B. Roesken-Winter (Eds.), From beliefs to dynamic affect systems in mathematics education. Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar
  14. Speer, N. (2005). Issues of methods and theory in the study of mathematics teachers’ professed and attributed beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Swedish Research Council. (2008). Forskningsetiska Principer inom Humanistisk-Samhällsvetenskaplig Forskning [Ethical principles in research in the humanities and social sciences]. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.Google Scholar
  16. Swedish Schools Inspectorate. (2009). Undervisningen i matematik: Utbildningens innehåll och ändamålsenlighet [The teaching of mathematics: The content and the effectiveness of education]. Kvalitetsgranskning rapport 2009:5. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  17. Wang, J., Odell, S. J., & Schwille, S. A. (2008). Effects of teacher induction on beginning teachers’ teaching: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(2), 132–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wilson, S., & Cooney, T. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development: The role of beliefs. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 127–147). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linnaeus UniversityVäxjöSweden

Personalised recommendations