Skip to main content

Compression for Managing Scars

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1254 Accesses

Abstract

Compression is one of the most powerful agent in reducing hypertrophic scars. The different modes of compression are dependant on the clinical evolution of the scar, the anatomical location and the compliance of the patient to wear uncomfortable and socially impacting therapies. This segment is in permanent challenge as most of the proposed solutions are fewly accepted by the patients, more particularly in adolescent or young adults. Since a few years new limited local technologies propose a mechanical immobilisation limited to the scar itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Linares HA, Larson DL, Willis-Galstaun BA. Historical notes on the use of pressure in treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. Burns. 1993;19:17–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloemen MC, van der Veer WM, Ulrich MM, et al. Prevention and curative management of hypertrophic scar formation. Burns. 2009;35:463–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, Hobbs FD, Ramelet AA, Shakespeare PG, Stella M, Téot L, et al. International advisory panel on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(2):560–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogawa R, Okai K, Tokumura F, Mori K, Ohmori Y, Huang C, et al. The relationship between skin stretching/contraction and pathologic scarring: the important role of mechanical forces in keloid generation. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(2):149–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00766.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Desmoulière A, Geinoz A, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 induces alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in granulation tissue myofibroblasts and in quiescent and growing cultured fibroblasts. J Cell Biol. 1993;122(1):103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Desmouliere A, Badid C, Bochaton-Piallat ML, Gabbiani G. Apoptosis during wound healing, fibrocontractive diseases and vascular wall injury. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997;29(1):19–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Darby IA, Laverdet B, Bonté F, Desmoulière A. Fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in wound healing. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014;7:301–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Renò F, Sabbatini M, Lombardi F, et al. In vitro mechanical compression induces apoptosis and regulates cytokines release in hypertrophic scars. Wound Repair Regen. 2003;11:331–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gavroy JP, Dinard J, Costagliola M, Rouge D, Griffe O, Téot L, Ster F. LPG and the cutaneous softening of burns. J Plaies et Cicatrisation Dec. 1996;5:42–6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harn HI, Ogawa R, Hsu CK, Hughes MW, Tang MJ, Chuong CM. The tension biology of wound healing. Exp Dermatol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.13460. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

  11. Longaker MT, Rohrich RJ, Greenberg L, Furnas H, Wald R, Bansal V, et al. A randomized controlled trial of the embrace advanced scar therapy device to reduce incisional scar formation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):536–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang K, Kim HJ, Kim KY, Han SH, Hwang SJ. Skin tension related to tension reduction sutures. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2014;3(10):626–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suarez E, Syed F, Rasgado TA, Walmsley A, Mandal P, Bayat A. Skin equivalent tensional forces alters keloid fibroblast behavior and phenotype. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38:767–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kilpadi DV, Lessing C, Derrick K. Healed porcine incisions previously treated with a surgical incision management system: mechanical, histomorphometric, and gene expression properties. Biophys J. 2014;106(4):932–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parry JR, Stupak HD, Johnson CM. The immediate use of a silicone sheet wound closure device in scar reduction and prevention. Ear Nose Throat J. 2016;95(2):E27–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barnes LA, Marshall CD, Leavitt T, Hu MS, Moore AL, Gonzalez JG, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. Mechanical forces in cutaneous wound healing: emerging therapies to minimize scar formation. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018;7(2):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2016.0709. Review

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roques C. Pressure therapy to treat burn scars. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10(2):122–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mc Ginn CA, Boucher N. Institut de Réadaptation en déficience Physique de Québec. Les vêtements compressifs dans le traitement et la réadaptation des grands Brûlés. Exploration préliminaire de la littérature; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Engrav LH, Heimbach DH, Rivara FP, et al. 12-year within-wound study of the effectiveness of pressure garment therapy. Burns. 2010;36:975–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Atiyeh BS. Nonsurgical management of hypertrophic scars: evidence-based therapies, standard practices, and emerging methods. Aesthet Plast Surg. 2007;31:468–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ripper S, Renneberg B, Landmann C, et al. Adherence to pressure garment therapy in adult burn patients. Burns. 2009;35:657–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Monstrey S, Middelkoop E, Vranckx JJ, Bassetto F, Ziegler UE, Meaume S, Téot L. Updated scar management practical guidelines: non-invasive and invasive measures. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67:1017–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jin-Wei AI, Liu J-t, Pei S-D, Liu Y, Li D-S, Lin H-M, Pei B. The effectiveness of pressure therapy (15–25 mmHg) for hypertrophic burn scars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luc Téot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Téot, L., Masanovic, M.G., Faure-Chazelles, C. (2019). Compression for Managing Scars. In: Mani, R., Rerkasem, K., Nair, H., Shukla, V. (eds) Compression and Chronic Wound Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01195-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01195-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01194-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01195-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics