Skip to main content

Alternative Technological Approaches to Achieving Improved Venous Return

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Compression and Chronic Wound Management

Abstract

The role and importance of compression in achieving venous return is well understood and the use of multilayer compression remains the standard of care for the patient with a Venous Ulcer. However a range of alternative technologies have emerged which aim to reduce or overcome some of the disadvantages of bandaging. This chapter explores methods of pressure assessment under bandages to facilitate application of bandages and also discusses alternatives to bandaging including adjustable systems, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) Systems and finally powered muscle stimulators. All these approaches, as the evidence supporting them develops, could offer useful alternatives to compression for a number of patient groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Harding K, Dowsett C, Flas L, et al. Simplifying venous leg ulcer management: consensus recommendations. Wounds International. 2015. https://tinyurl.com/jrxfcrj. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.

  2. Franks P, Barker J, Collier M, et al. Management of patients with venous leg ulcers: challenges and current best practice. J Wound Care. 2016;25(Suppl 6):S1–S67. http://ewma.org/?id=219. Accessed 10 Jun 2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Partsch H, Mosti G. Comparison of three portable instruments to measure compression pressure. Int Angiol. 2010;29(5):426–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahoney K, Ovens L, Harris E, et al. A proven alternative to compression bandaging: clinical review of Juxtacures. J Wound Care. 2017;26(4 Suppl 1):S1–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson EA, Hillman A, Thomas K. Intermittent pneumatic compression for treating venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5:CD001899.

    Google Scholar 

  6. https://tinyurl.com/y93m8kz3. Accessed 10 Jun 2018.

  7. Harris C, Loney A, Brooke J, et al. Refractory venous leg ulcers: observational evaluation of innovative new technology. Int Wound J. 2017;14(6):1100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark C. Richardson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Richardson, M.C. (2019). Alternative Technological Approaches to Achieving Improved Venous Return. In: Mani, R., Rerkasem, K., Nair, H., Shukla, V. (eds) Compression and Chronic Wound Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01195-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01195-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01194-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01195-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics