Skip to main content

An Agent-Based Modelling Approach to Analyse the Public Opinion on Politicians

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2382 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 11185))

Abstract

A politician’s popularity can be measured by polls or by measuring the amount of times a politician is mentioned on the Internet in a positive or negative manner. This paper introduces an approach to an agent-based computational model to model a politician’s popularity within a population that participates on the Internet over time. A particle swarm optimization algorithm is used for parameter tuning to identify the characteristics of all agents based on the analysis of public opinions on a politician found on the Internet. The properties of the network are verified by applying a social network analysis. A mathematical analysis is used to get more in depth understanding on the model and to verify its correctness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A.: Opinion dynamics and learning in social networks. Dyn. Games Appl. 1(1), 3–49 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Barabási, A.L., Albert, R.: Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: ICWSM, vol. 8, pp. 361–362 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., Rojas, F.: More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS ONE 8(11), e79449 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5(3) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, J.: Philosophy of Mind. Westview Press, Boulder (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kuipers, B.J.: Commonsense reasoning about causality: deriving behavior from structure. Artif. Intell. 24, 169–203 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuipers, B.J., Kassirer, J.P.: How to discover a knowledge representation for causal reasoning by studying an expert physician. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 1983, William Kaufman, Los Altos, CA, pp. 49–56 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lazarsfeld, P.F., Gaudet, H., Berelson, B.: The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. Columbia University Press, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Metaxas, P.T., Mustafaraj, E., Gayo-Avello, D.: How (not) to predict elections. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Social Computing, SocialCom 2011, pp. 165–171. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nickerson, D.W.: Is voting contagious? evidence from two field experiments. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 102(01), 49–57 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Poli, R., Kennedy, J., Blackwell, T.: Particle swarm optimization. An overview. Swarm Intell. 1, 33–57 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sang, E.T.K., Bos, J.: Predicting the 2011 Dutch senate election results with twitter. In: Proceedings of the workshop on semantic analysis in social media, pp. 53–60. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Treur, J.: Dynamic modeling based on a temporal–causal network modeling approach. Biologically Inspired Cogn. Architectures 16, 131–168 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modelling: Addressing Complexity of Cognitive, Affective and Social Interactions. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45213-5

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Watts, D.J., Dodds, P.S.: Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation. J. Consum. Res. 34(4), 441–458 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Treur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brouwers, T.M.A., Onneweer, J.P.T., Treur, J. (2018). An Agent-Based Modelling Approach to Analyse the Public Opinion on Politicians. In: Staab, S., Koltsova, O., Ignatov, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01128-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01129-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics