Skip to main content

Diversity in Online Advertising: A Case Study of 69 Brands on Social Media

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2018)

Abstract

Lack of diversity in advertising is a long-standing problem. Despite growing cultural awareness and missed business opportunities, many minorities remain under- or inappropriately represented in advertising. Previous research has studied how people react to culturally embedded ads, but such work focused mostly on print media or television using lab experiments. In this work, we look at diversity in content posted by 69 U.S. brands on two social media platforms, Instagram and Facebook. Using face detection technology, we infer the gender, race, and age of both the faces in the ads and of the users engaging with ads. Using this dataset, we investigate the following: (1) What type of content brands put out – Is there a lack of diversity?; (2) How does a brand’s content diversity compare to its audience diversity – Is any lack of diversity simply a reflection of the audience?; and (3) How does brand diversity relate to user engagement – Do users of a particular demographic engage more if their demographics are represented in a post?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://brandirectory.com/league_tables/table/global-500-2016.

  2. 2.

    http://interbrand.com/best-brands/best-global-brands/2016.

  3. 3.

    https://www.faceplusplus.com/.

  4. 4.

    http://selfiecity.net.

  5. 5.

    See https://www.indy100.com/article/disability-adverts-tv-uncomfortable-study-maltesers-wheelchair-8253546 or https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/invisibles-why-portrayals-disability-so-rare-advertising/1407945 for two opinion articles on the topic.

References

  1. An, J., Weber, I.: #greysanatomy vs. #yankees: demographics and hashtag use on Twitter. In: ICWSM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Appiah, O.: Black, White, Hispanic, and Asian American adolescents’ responses to culturally embedded ads. Howard J. Commun. 12(1), 29–48 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bakhshi, S., Shamma, D.A., Gilbert, E.: Faces engage us: photos with faces attract more likes and comments on instagram. In: CHI (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brinker, J.T., Schadendorf, D., Klode, J., Cosgarea, I., Rösch, A., Jansen, P., Stoffels, I., Izar, B.: Photoaging mobile apps as a novel opportunity for melanoma prevention: pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5(7), e101 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bush, R.F.: White consumer sales response to black models. J. Mark. 38(2), 25–29 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cagley, J.W., Cardozo, R.N.: White response to integrated advertising. J. Advert. Res. 10(2), 35–39 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Estes, A.C.: Brief History Racist Soft Drinks (2013). https://goo.gl/XvYGD7

  8. Forehand, M.R., Deshpandé, R., Reed II, A.: Identity salience and the influence of differential activation of the social self-schema on advertising response. J. Appl. Psychol. 87(6), 1086–1099 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia, D., Weber, I., Garimella, V.R.K.: Gender asymmetries in reality and fiction: the Bechdel test of social media. In: ICWSM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Henderson, J.J., Baldasty, G.J.: Race, advertising, and prime-time television. Howard J. Commun. 14(2), 97–112 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hershfield, H.E., et al.: Increasing saving behavior through age-progressed renderings of the future self. J. Mark. Res. 48, S23–S37 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jung, S., An, J., Kwak, H., Salminen, J., Jansen, B.: Assessing the accuracy of four popular face recognition tools for inferring gender, age, and race. In: ICWSM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karras, T., Aila, T., Laine, S., Lehtinen, J.: Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation. In: ICLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kocabey, E., et al.: Face-to-BMI: using computer vision to infer body mass index on social media. In: ICWSM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kocabey, E., Ofli, F., Marin, J., Torralba, A., Weber, I.: Using computer vision to study the effects of BMI on online popularity and weight-based homophily. In: SocInfo (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, Y.J., Kim, S.: How do racial minority consumers process a model race cue in CSR advertising? A comparison of Asian and White Americans. J. Mark. Commun. 1–21 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lloyds: Lloyds Diversity Report (2016). https://goo.gl/ehck2D

  18. Martin, B.: The influence of ad model ethnicity and self-referencing on attitudes: evidence from New Zealand. J. Advert. 33(4), 27–37 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, A.N., Kinya, J., Booker, N., Kizito, M., wa Ngula, K.: Kenyan patients attitudes regarding doctor ethnicity and doctor-patient ethnic discordance. Patient Educ. Couns. 82(2), 201–206 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. NPR: This Ad’s For You (2015). https://goo.gl/z8jQTB

  21. NYTimes: Upbeat Interracial Ad for Old Navy Leads to Backlash. Twice (2016). https://goo.gl/RHkjsS

  22. Olivola, C.Y., Todorov, A.: Elected in 100 milliseconds: appearance-based trait inferences and voting. J. Nonverbal Behav. 34(2), 83–110 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paek, H., Shah, H.: Racial ideology, model minorities, and the “not-so-silent partner:” stereotyping of Asian Americans in U.S. magazine advertising. Howard J. Commun. 14(4), 225–243 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Qualls, W.J., Moore, D.J.: Stereotyping effects on consumers’ evaluation of advertising: Impact of racial differences between actors and viewers. Psychol. Mark. 7(2), 135–151 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reis, J., Kwak, H., An, J., Messias, J., Benevenuto, F.: Demographics of news sharing in the U.S. Twittersphere. In: HT (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sierra, J.J., Hyman, M.R., Torres, I.M.: Using a model’s apparent ethnicity to influence viewer responses to print ads: a social identity theory perspective. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 31(2), 41–66 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Spearman, C.: The proof and measurement of association between two things. Am. J. Psychol. 15(1), 72–101 (1904)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Travassos, C., Williams, D.R.: The concept and measurement of race and their relationship to public health: a review focused on Brazil and the United States. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 20, 660–678 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsai, W.H.S.: Assimilating the queers: representations of lesbians, gay men, bisexual, and transgender people in mainstream advertising. Advert. Soc. Rev. 11(1) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zagheni, E., Garimella, V.R.K., Weber, I.: Inferring international and internal migration patterns from twitter data. In: WWW (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jisun An .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

An, J., Weber, I. (2018). Diversity in Online Advertising: A Case Study of 69 Brands on Social Media. In: Staab, S., Koltsova, O., Ignatov, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01128-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01129-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics