Abstract
We here study the behavior of political party members aiming at identifying how ideological communities are created and evolve over time in diverse (fragmented and non-fragmented) party systems. Using public voting data of both Brazil and the US, we propose a methodology to identify and characterize ideological communities, their member polarization, and how such communities evolve over time, covering a 15-year period. Our results reveal very distinct patterns across the two case studies, in terms of both structural and dynamic properties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
This threshold was chosen based on Article 55 of the Brazilian Constitution that establishes that a deputy or senator will lose her mandate if she does not attend more than one third of the sessions.
- 4.
Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff was impeached from office and, therefore, Brazil had two Presidents that year.
- 5.
For Brazil: Worker’s Party (PT) and the Brazilian Democratic Movement Party (PMDB). For the US: Democratic (D) and Republican (R).
- 6.
The density of a network is given by the ratio of the total number of existing edges to the maximum possible number of edges in the graph. The clustering coefficient, on the other hand, measures the degree at which the nodes of the graph tend to group together to form triangles, and is defined as the ratio of the number of existing closed triplets to the total number of open and closed triplets. A triplet is three nodes that are connected by either two (open triplet) or three (closed triplet) undirected ties.
References
Agathangelou, P., Katakis, I., Rori, L., Gunopulos, D., Richards, B.: Understanding online political networks: the case of the far-right and far-left in Greece. In: Ciampaglia, G.L., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds.) SocInfo 2017. LNCS, vol. 10539, pp. 162–177. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_11
Ames, B.: The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. University of Michigan Press (2009)
Andris, C., Lee, D., Hamilton, M.J., Martino, M., Gunning, C.E., Selden, J.A.: The rise of partisanship and super-cooperators in the U.S. house of representatives. PLOS ONE 10(4), 1–14 (2015)
Arinik, N., Figueiredo, R., Labatut, V.: Signed graph analysis for the interpretation of voting behavior. In: International Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Digital Humanities (2017)
Baldassarri, D., Gelman, A.: Partisans without constraint: political polarization and trends in american public opinion. Am. J. Soc. 114(2), 408–446 (2008)
BBC: Brazil profile - timeline (2018). http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-19359111
Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theor. Exp. 2008(10) (2008)
Budge, I., Laver, M.J.: Party Policy and Government Coalitions. Springer, London (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22368-8
Cai, Q., Ma, L., Gong, M., Tian, D.: A survey on network community detection based on evolutionary computation. Int. J. Bio-Inspired Comput. 8(2), 84–98 (2016)
Cherepnalkoski, D., Karpf, A., Mozetič, M.: Cohesion and coalition formation in the european parliament: Roll-call votes and twitter activities. PLOS ONE 11(11), 1–27 (2016)
Dal Maso, C., Pompa, G., Puliga, M., Riotta, G., Chessa, A.: Voting behavior, coalitions and government strength through a complex network analysis. PLOS ONE 9, 1–13 (2015)
Darwish, K., Magdy, W., Zanouda, T.: Trump vs. Hillary: what went viral during the 2016 US presidential election. In: Ciampaglia, G.L., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds.) SocInfo 2017. LNCS, vol. 10539, pp. 143–161. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_10
Easley, D., Kleinberg, J.: Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning About a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press, New York (2010)
Fiorina, M.P., Abrams, S.J.: Political polarization in the american public. Ann. Rev. Polit. Sci. 11(1), 563–588 (2008)
Fortunato, S.: Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486(3), 75–174 (2010)
Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. In: Social Networks, pp. 347–367. Elsevier (1977)
Hix, S., Noury, A., Roland, G.: Power to the parties: cohesion and competition in the european parliament, 1979–2001. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 35(2), 209–234 (2005)
Jones, J.J., Settle, J.E., Bond, R.M., Fariss, C.J., Marlow, C., Fowler, J.H.: Inferring tie strength from online directed behavior. PLOS ONE 8(1), 1–6 (2013)
Levorato, M., Frota, Y.: Brazilian Congress structural balance analysis. J. Interdisc. Methodologies Issues Sci. Graphs Soci. Syst. (2017)
Mainwaring, S., Shugart, M.S.: Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)
Mann, T.E., Ornstein, N.J.: It’s even worse than it looks: how the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. In: Basic Books (2016)
McGee, J., Caverlee, J., Cheng, Z.: Location prediction in social media based on tie strength. In: Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, CIKM 2013, pp. 459–468. ACM, New York (2013)
Vaz de Melo, P.O.S.: How many political parties should brazil have? a data-driven method to assess and reduce fragmentation in multi-party political systems. PLOS ONE 10(10), 1–24 (2015)
Mendonça, I., Trouve, A., Fukuda, A.: Exploring the importance of negative links through the European parliament social graph. In: Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on E-Society, E-Education and E-Technology, ICSET 2017, pp. 1–7. ACM, New York (2017)
Moody, J., Mucha, P.J.: Portrait of political party polarization. Netw. Sci. 1(1), 119–121 (2013)
Newman, M.E.J.: Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 103(23), 8577–8582 (2006)
Plantié, M., Crampes, M.: Survey on social community detection. In: Ramzan, N., van Zwol, R., Lee, J.S., Clüver, K., Hua, X.S. (eds.) Social Media Retrieval, pp. 65–85. Springer, London (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4555-4_4
Porter, M.A., Mucha, P.J., Newman, M.E.J., Warmbrand, C.M.: A network analysis of committees in the U.S. house of representatives. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 102(20), 7057–7062 (2005)
Rossetti, G., Cazabet, R.: Community discovery in dynamic networks: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(2), 35:1–35:37 (2018)
Sartori, G.: Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. ECPR Press (2005)
Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIGMOBILE Mob. Comput. Commun. Rev. 5(1), 3–55 (2001)
Vinh, N.X., Epps, J., Bailey, J.: Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: variants, properties, normalization and correction for chance. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 11, 2837–2854 (2010)
Vox: Brazil’s political crisis, explained (2016). https://www.vox.com/2016/4/21/11451210/dilma-rousseff-impeachment
Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Hong, Z., Berger, R., Luo, J.: How polarized have we become? A multimodal classification of trump followers and clinton followers. In: Ciampaglia, G.L., Mashhadi, A., Yasseri, T. (eds.) SocInfo 2017. LNCS, vol. 10539, pp. 440–456. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67217-5_27
Waugh, A.S., Pei, L., Fowler, J.H., Mucha, P.J., Porter, M.A.: Party polarization in congress: a social networks approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:0907.3509 (2009)
Wei, W., Carley, K.M.: Measuring temporal patterns in dynamic social networks. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 10(1), 9:1–9:27 (2015)
Wiese, J., Min, J.K., Hong, J.I., Zimmerman, J.: “You never call, you never write”: Call and SMS logs do not always indicate tie strength. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW 2015, pp. 765–774. ACM, New York (2015)
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the FAPEMIG-PRONEX-MASWeb project – Models, Algorithms and Systems for the Web, process number APQ-01400-14, as well as by the National Institute of Science and Technology for the Web (INWEB), CNPq and FAPEMIG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gomes Ferreira, C.H., de Sousa Matos, B., Almeira, J.M. (2018). Analyzing Dynamic Ideological Communities in Congressional Voting Networks. In: Staab, S., Koltsova, O., Ignatov, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01129-1_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01128-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01129-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)