Skip to main content

High-Resolution Endoscopic Ultrasound: Clinical T-Staging of Superficial and Subepithelial Gastrointestinal Neoplasias

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Early Neoplasias of the Gastrointestinal Tract

Abstract

High-resolution endoscopic ultrasound (hr-EUS) with miniprobes performed during diagnostic endoscopy yields information on invasion depth of early cancer and on lesions arising in intramural echo structures. This chapter explains the diagnostic characteristics of hr-EUS images of early mucosal neoplasias and of the most prevalent types of intramural tumors. Imaging by hr-EUS characterizes subepithelial tumors for size, invasiveness, and wall layer of origin, and distinguishes superficial mucosal neoplasias from deeply submucosa-invasive early cancer with about 90% accuracy in most locations of the GI tract. Hr-EUS imaging should be available when the decision is taken between endoscopic or surgical resection for subepithelial tumors or for superficial versus submucosa-invasive early cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yamanaka T. JGES consensus meeting report in DDW-Japan 2000, Kobe: interpretation of the layered structure of gastrointestinal wall with endoscopic ultrasonography. Dig Endosc. 2002;14:39–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshinaga S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound using ultrasound probes for the diagnosis of early esophageal and gastric cancers. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;4:218–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goda K, et al. Magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for predicting the invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2009;22:453–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. He LJ, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography for staging of T1a and T1b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1340–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jung JI, et al. Clinicopathologic factors influencing the accuracy of EUS for superficial esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:6322–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee MW, et al. Predicting the invasion depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnifying endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:853–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim GH, et al. Accuracy of high-frequency catheter-based endoscopic ultrasonography according to the indications for endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:506–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshida M, et al. Endoscopic assessment of invasion of colorectal tumors with a new high-frequency ultrasound probe. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:587–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshinaga S, et al. Current status of endoscopic ultrasound for the upper gastrointestinal tract in Asia. Dig Endosc. 2015;27(Suppl 1):2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsumoto Y, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of submucosal invasion in early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:326–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshida S, et al. Diagnostic ability of high-frequency ultrasound probe sonography in staging early gastric cancer, especially for submucosal invasion. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:518–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pech O, et al. The impact of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography on the TNM staging of early cancer in Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2223–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasegawa N, et al. Preoperative staging of superficial esophageal carcinoma: comparison of an ultrasound probe and standard endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:388–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunerbein M, et al. Endosonography of upper gastrointestinal tract cancer on demand using miniprobes or endoscopic ultrasound. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:615–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Menzel J, et al. Preoperative staging of esophageal carcinoma: miniprobe sonography versus conventional endoscopic ultrasound in a prospective histopathologically verified study. Endoscopy. 1999;31:291–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Akashi K, et al. Ulcerous change decreases the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis for the invasive depth of early gastric cancer. Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2006;37:133–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. May A, et al. Accuracy of staging in early oesophageal cancer using high resolution endoscopy and high resolution endosonography: a comparative, prospective, and blinded trial. Gut. 2004;53:634–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsung PC, et al. Miniprobe endoscopic ultrasonography has limitations in determining the T stage in early colorectal cancer. Gut Liver. 2013;7:163–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chemaly M, et al. Miniprobe EUS in the pretherapeutic assessment of early esophageal neoplasia. Endoscopy. 2008;40:2–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Arima M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of tumor staging and treatment outcomes in patients with superficial esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc. 2007;4:145–53.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang JH, et al. A prospective study comparing endoscopy and EUS in the evaluation of GI subepithelial masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:202–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Iwamuro M, et al. Esophageal granular cell tumors can be differentiated from leiomyomas using endoscopic ultrasonography. Intern Med. 2018;57:1509–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nishida T, et al. The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19:3–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nishida T, et al. Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:479–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sato Y, et al. Management of gastric and duodenal neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:6817–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiech T, et al. Histopathological classification of nonneoplastic and neoplastic gastrointestinal submucosal lesions. Endoscopy. 2005;37:630–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hwang JH, et al. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:2217–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Dumonceau JM, et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated January 2017. Endoscopy. 2017;49:695–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gao Z, et al. The cut-off value of tumor size and appropriate timing of follow-up for management of minimal EUS-suspected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017;17:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yegin EG, et al. Small EUS-suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: An overview for the current state of management. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Soweid AM. Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:836–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao Y, et al. The diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ignee A, et al. Contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017;6:55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. von Mehren M, et al. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw JNCCN. 2018;16:536–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rindi G, et al. TNM staging of foregut (neuro)endocrine tumors: a consensus proposal including a grading system. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:395–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Seifert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Seifert, H., Kikuchi, D., Yahagi, N. (2019). High-Resolution Endoscopic Ultrasound: Clinical T-Staging of Superficial and Subepithelial Gastrointestinal Neoplasias. In: Berr, F., Oyama, T., Ponchon, T., Yahagi, N. (eds) Atlas of Early Neoplasias of the Gastrointestinal Tract. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01114-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01114-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01113-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01114-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics