Abstract
The history of the CESEE has been stormy over time. Its strategic geographical location and the policy of conquest by neighbouring countries, such as Austria, Prussia, Russia, and Turkey, have significantly impacted the development of societies and economies of CESEE. After World War II, the CESEE countries found themselves behind the Iron Curtain and were under total influence of the Soviet Union. The situation changed in the late 1980s when communism started to collapse in the Eastern Bloc. From then on, the CESEE countries have begun to move from centrally planned towards market economies. This is the reason why they have been referred to as transition economies. In this chapter, we present a brief history of this region, with special attention paid to the period of transition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Starting in 1990; based on IMF data from World Economic Outlook. Due to the lack of historical data for some Balkan states and former Soviet Union republics, we are not able to present a complete picture.
- 2.
Vouchers were distributed under mass privatization programmes to citizens free of charge.
- 3.
Advanced economies are represented in our study by EU âoldâ Member States, Norway, Switzerland, USA, and Japan.
Bibliography
Baltowski M, Mickiewicz T (2000) Privatisation in Poland: Ten Years After Privatisation in Poland: Ten Years After, Post-Communist Econ 12(4):425â443. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631370050216498
Bitzenis A, Marangos J (2007) Globalization and the Integration-Assisted Transition in Central and Eastern European Economies. J Econ Issues 41(2):427â434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2007.11507030
Bornstein M (1999) Framework Issues in the Privatisation Strategies of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. Post-Communist Econ 11(1):47â77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631379996048
Brucker H. (1997) Privatisation in East Germany. A Neo-Institutional Analysis. London, Frank Cass
CieĆlik A, Tarsalewska M (2013) Privatization, Convergence, and Growth. Eastern Eur Econ 51(1):5â20. https://doi.org/10.2753/EEE0012-877551010
ÄuÄkoviÄ N (1993) Privatisation in Croatia: What went wrong? Hist Eur Ideas 17(6):725â733. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(93)90095-8
da Rocha BT (2015) Let the markets begin: The interplay between free prices and privatisation in early transition. J Comp Econ 43(2):350â370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.10.003
Fidrmuc J, Tichit A (2009) Mind the break! Accounting for changing patterns of growth during transition. Econ Sys 33(2):138â154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2009.02.002
Foster N, Stehrer R (2007) Modeling transformation in CEECs using smooth transitions. J Comp Econ 35(1):57â86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.002
Hashi I, Xhillari L (1999) Privatisation and Transition in Albania. Post-Communist Econ 11(1):99â125. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631379996066
Iwanicz-Drozdowska M (2016) SieÄ bezpieczeĆstwa finansowego. Gdzie szukaÄ liderĂłw? In: KarmaĆska A, Ostaszewski J (ed) PrzeĆamywanie dysonansĂłw poznawczych jako czynnik stymulowania rozwoju nauk o finansach. SGH, Warsaw
Iwanicz-Drozdowska M, Smaga P, Witkowski B (2016) Financial Development. Have Post-Communist Countries Converged? Trans Bus Econ 15(2A)(38A):389â414
Kornai J (1979) Resource-Constrained versus Demand-Constrained Systems. Econometrica 47(4):801â819
Kornai J (1980) Economics of Shortage. Amsterdam: North Holland
Kornai J (1994) Transformational Recession: The Main Causes. J Comp Econ 19(1):39â63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1994.1062
Louzek M (2009) The Czech privatisation after 20 years. Post-Communist Econ 21(3):345â359. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463137090309065
Mygind, N (1999). Privatisation, governance and restructuring of enterprises in the Baltics, OECD
Polijaniuk H, Obal T (2002) Kraje nadbaĆtyckie In: Iwanicz-Drozdowska M (ed) Kryzysy bankowe. Przyczyny i rozwiÄ zania. PWE, Warsaw
Popov V (2007) Shock Therapy versus Gradualism Reconsidered: Lessons from Transition Economies after 15 Years of Reforms. Comp Econ Stud 49(1):1â31. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100182
PrĂłchniak M, Witkowski B (2014) On the Stability of the Catching-Up Process Among Old and New EU Member States On the Stability of the Catching-Up Process Among Old and New EU Member States. Eastern Eur Econ 52(2):5â27. https://doi.org/10.2753/EEE0012-8775520201
Prohaski G (1998) A review of Bulgarian privatisation. OECD and Bulgarian Centre for Economic Development
RadiçovĂĄ I (1993) Privatisation: The case of Slovakia. Hist Eur Ideas 17(6):735â740. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(93)90096-9
Slaveski T (1997) Privatization in the Republic of Macedonia Privatization in the Republic of Macedonia Five Years After. Eastern Eur Econ 35(1):31â51. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.1997.11648611
Thompson G, Valsan C (1999) Early Privatization in Romania Early Privatization in Romania. Eastern Eur Econ 37(6):35â53 https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.1999.11648704
Yekhanurov Y (2000) The Progress of Privatization The Progress of Privatization. Eastern Eur Econ 38(1):71â93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2000.11648712
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iwanicz-Drozdowska, M. (2018). CESEE Countries: Historical Background, Transition, and Development. In: Foreign-Owned Banks. Studies in Economic Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01111-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01111-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01110-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01111-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)