Abstract
This chapter builds on the conclusions of Chapter 3, using the metaphor of “romance” to assess the rise of cities as they have engaged states and international organizations, and vice versa. While international affairs have environmentalized, global environmentalism in turn has strongly urbanized in recent decades. The discussion thus presses the case for how urban space was steadily reconceptualized after the denouement of the Cold War as a “global solution” to ecological challenges. One major implication is that political ecologies have now “delocalized” and “upscaled,” a process that has caused its own tensions and political contradictions. Attention is paid to signature initiatives like Local Agenda 21, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the rise of inter-municipal policy networks, and recent “smartness” discourses. In particular, the chapter identifies three distinctive kinds of urbanizations: international, transnational, and smart. Each section considers major world cities to help illustrate synoptic themes. Cape Town, Los Angles, and Melbourne receive special treatment, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An extended treatment of this theoretical approach, especially as influenced by Bob Jessop, lies beyond the present book. Suffice to note only that neo-Gramscian state theory , as MacLeod and Goodwin (1999, p. 515) put it, directly citing Bob Jessop’s work, explores “how political, intellectual and moral leadership is ‘mediated through a complex ensemble of institutions, organizations and forces operating within, orientated toward or located at a distance from the juridico-political state apparatus.’” Their work is important here because it accounts for major changes in the territorialities and relationalities of the state without accepting tout court the “denationalization of statehood or the hollowing-out of the state” (ibid.).
- 2.
The World Assembly of Local and Regional Governments, founded in 2013, is a global action forum that “coordinates major international networks of local governments to undertake joint advocacy work relating to global policy processes.” Its members include many of the most influential and powerful transnational municipal networks formed to address global problems in recent years, including UCLG, ICLEI , C40 , and Metropolis, among many others. See: https://www.global-taskforce.org/about-us.
- 3.
According to Dorogovtsev, Goltsev, and Mendes (2006) k-core techniques extract and index interconnected parts of complex networks—communities, cliques, cores, etc.—in order to locate relations between substructures, which in turn illuminates the topologies of real-world networks.
- 4.
This language and related discussion can be found at: http://www.c40.org/programmes/compact-of-mayors.
- 5.
This paragraph, particularly references to the Social Justice Coalition, draws directly on multiple conversations and ongoing research collaborations with Britta Ricker of the University of Twente in the Netherlands as well as the author’s own research and professional experiences in Cape Town over the past 20 years.
References
Acuto, M. (2018). Global science for city policy. Science (New York, N.Y.), 359(6372), 165. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2728.
Acuto, M., & Rayner, S. (2016). City networks: Breaking gridlocks or forging (new) lock‐ins? International Affairs, 92(5), 1147–1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12700.
Adams, R., & Adeleke, F. (2016). Assessing the potential role of open data in South African environmental management. The African Journal of Information and Communication, 19, 79–99.
Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092.
Anderton, K., & Setzer, J. (2017). Subnational climate entrepreneurship: Innovative climate action in California and São Paulo. Regional Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1160-2.
Andrew, J., Kaidonis, M., & Andrew, B. (2010). Carbon tax: Challenging neoliberal solutions to climate change. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21(7), 611–618.
Ansari, S. (2017). The neo-liberal incentive structure and the absence of the developmental state in post-apartheid South Africa. African Affairs, 116(463), 206–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adw074.
Anthopoulos, L. (2017). Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities, 63, 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.005.
Araya, D., & Arif, H. (2015). Introduction. In D. Araya (Ed.), Smart cities as democratic ecologies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bansard, J., Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2017). Cities to the rescue? Assessing the performance of transnational municipal networks in global climate governance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9318-9.
Barber, B. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Barber, B. (2017). Cool cities: Urban sovereignty and the fix for global warming. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Barrutia, J., Aguado, I., & Echebarria, C. (2007). Networking for Local Agenda 21 implementation: Learning from experiences with Udaltalde and Udalsarea in the Basque autonomous community. Geoforum, 38(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforuin.2006.05.004.
Barrutia, J., & Echebarria, C. (2011). Explaining and measuring the embrace of Local Agenda 21s by local governments. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43(2), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43338.
Barrutia, J., & Echebarria, C. (2013). Why do municipal authorities participate in- and are loyal to- LA21 networks? Journal of Cleaner Production, 41, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.006.
Barrutia, J., Echebarria, C., Paredes, M., Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza, V. (2015). From Rio to Rio+ 20: Twenty years of participatory, long term oriented and monitored local planning? Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.085.
Beauregard, R. (2018). Cities in the urban age: A dissent. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bertolini, P., & Giovannetti, E. (2006, July). Industrial districts and internationalization: The case of the agri-food industry in Modena, Italy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(4), 279–304.
Bond, P. (2010). Maintaining momentum after Copenhagen’s collapse: Seal the deal or “Seattle” the deal? Capitalism Nature Socialism, 21(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455751003675839.
Bookchin, M. (1991). The ecology of freedom: The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy (Rev ed.). Montreal: Black Rose Books.
Borsekova, K., & Nijkamp, P. (2018). Smart cities: A challenge to research and policy analysis. Cities, 78, 1–3.
Bosworth, B. (2016, June 16). South Africa has been key to putting informal settlements on the Habitat III agenda. Citiscope. Retrieved from http://citiscope.org/habitatIII/news/2016/06/south-africa-has-been-key-putting-informal-settlements-habitat-iii-agenda.
Bouteligier, S. (2013). Inequality in new global governance arrangements: The north-south divide in transnational municipal networks. Innovation—The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.771890.
Brenner, N. (1997). State territorial restructuring and the production of spatial scale: Urban and regional planning in the Federal Republic of Germany, 1960–1990. Political Geography, 16(4), 273–306.
Brenner, N. (2014). Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.
Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2011). Planetary urbanisation. In M. Gandy (Ed.), Urban constellations. Berlin: Jovis.
Brown, E. (2017, July 6). Message to the global citizen festival in Hamburg, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-jerry-brown-hamburg-climate-summit-htmlstory.html.
Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002.
Busch, H. (2015). Linked for action? An analysis of transnational municipal climate networks in Germany. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2015.1057144.
Busch, H. (2018). Entangled cities: Transnational municipal climate networks and urban governance. Ph.D. Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Cape Town City Council. (1998). The transportation plan for the Wetton-Landsdowne Corridor. Executive summary. Cape Town: Unpublished Technical Report, City Planner’s Department.
Castán Broto, V., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 92–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005.
Chan, D. K. H. (2016). City diplomacy and “glocal” governance: Revitalizing cosmopolitan democracy. Innovation—The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29(2), 134–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2016.1157684.
Church, J. (2017). Civil society and the open data movement. DTTP, Documents to the People, 45(3), 5–8.
City of Cape Town. (2012). Cape Town spatial development framework: Statutory report. Cape Town. Retrieved from http://www.capetown.gov.za/work%20and%20business/planning-portal/regulations-and-legislations/cape-town-spatial-development-framework.
City of Cape Town. (2016). The City of Cape Town’s Digital Journey. Cape Town. Retrieved from http://acceleratecapetown.co.za/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/The-City-of-Cape-Towns-Digital-Journey-Towards-a-Smarter-Future-Rudy-Abrahams-CoCT.pdf.
City of Los Angeles. (2016). Sustainable city plan: 2nd annual report 2016–2017. City of Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://plan.lamayor.org/.
City of Seattle. (2016). Open data program: 2016 annual report. Seattle: City of Seattle.
Clapp, J., & Dauvergne, P. (2008). Paths to a green world: The political economy of the global environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Datta, A. (2015). New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat. Dialogues in Human Geography, 5(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820614565748.
Davenport, C., & Nagourney, A. (2017, May 23). Fighting Trump on climate, California becomes a global force. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/23/us/california-engages-world-and-fights-washington-on-climate-change.html.
Davidson, K., & Gleeson, B. (2015). Interrogating urban climate leadership: Toward a political ecology of the C40 network. Global Environmental Politics, 15(4), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00321.
Davis, M. (1999). Ecology of fear: Los Angeles and the imagination of disaster. New York: Vintage Books.
Davis, M. (2006). City of quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. London and New York: Verso.
Davis, R. (2013). Is the future of Cape Town 25km from Cape Town? Retrieved from https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2013-05-17-is-the-future-of-cape-town-25km-from-cape-town/.
de Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C. J., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004.
de Macedo, L. V., Setzer, J., & Rei, F. (2016). Transnational action fostering climate protection in the city of Sao Paulo and beyond. Disp, 52(2), 35–44.
Del Biaggio, C. (2011). Bridging national boundaries: How networks of local actors are building the Alpine region. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.029.
Delaney, B. (2017, August 16). Melbourne is ‘most liveable city’ again. But it’s also harder, crueller, out of reach. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/17/melbourne-is-most-liveable-city-again-but-its-also-harder-crueller-out-of-reach.
Dewar, D. (1979). Low income housing policy in South Africa: With particular reference to the Western Cape/David Dewar, George Ellis. Cape Town: Urban Problems Research Unit, University of Cape Town.
Dewar, D. (1998, February 8). Personal Communication.
Dewar, D., & Todeschini, F. (1998). Urban integration and economic development. London: Frankolin.
Dewar, D., & Watson, V. (1990). The structure and form of metropolitan Cape Town: Its origins, influences and performance (Working Paper No. 42). Retrieved from Cape Town.
Dierwechter, Y. (2008). Urban growth management and its discontents: Promises, practices and geopolitics in US city-regions. New York: Palgrave.
Dierwechter, Y. (2010). Metropolitan geographies of US climate action: Cities, suburbs and the local divide in global responsibilities. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 12(1), 59–82.
Dierwechter, Y. (2017). Urban sustainability through smart growth: Intercurrence, planning, and the geographies of regional development across Greater Seattle. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Dierwechter, Y., & Wessells, A. (2013). The uneven localisation of climate action in metropolitan Seattle. Urban Studies, 50(7), 1368–1385.
Dorogovtsev, S. N., Goltsev, A. V., & Mendes, J. F. F. (2006). K-Core organization of complex networks. Physical Review Letters, 96(4), 040601.
Dougherty, C., & Plumber, B. (2018, March 18). A bold, divisive plan to wean Californians from theirs cars. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/16/business/energy-environment/climate-density.html.
Dreier, P., Mollenkopf, J. H., & Swanstrom, T. (2014). Place matters: Metropolitics for the twenty-first century (3rd ed.). Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Ferguson, B. C., Brown, R. R., Frantzeskaki, N., de Haan, F. J., & Deletic, A. (2013). The enabling institutional context for integrated water management: Lessons from Melbourne. Water Research, 47(20), 7300–7314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.045.
Freund, B. (2001). Brown and green in Durban: The evolution of environmental policy in a post-apartheid city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(4), 717–739.
Frieden, B. (1979). The new regulation comes to suburbia. The Public Interest, 55, 15–27.
Frug, G. E. (2008). City bound: How states stifle urban innovation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., & Prado-Lorenzo, J. M. (2008). Determinant factors in the degree of implementation of Local Agenda 21 in the European Union. Sustainable Development, 16(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.334.
Gebre‐Egziabher, A. (2004). Sustainable cities programme: A joint UN‐HABITAT‐UNEP facility on the urban environment with participation of the Dutch government. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1023(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1319.016.
Girardet, H. (1999). Creating sustainable cities. Foxhole, UK: Green Books Ltd.
Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
Healey, P. (2006). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Herrschel, T., & Dierwechter, Y. (2015). Smart city-regional governance: A dual transition. Regions, 300(4), 20–22.
Herrschel, T., & Dierwechter, Y. (2018). Smart transitions in city-regionalism: The quest for competitiveness and sustainability. London: Routledge.
Hill, R. C. (2004). Cities and nested hierarchies. International Social Science Journal, 56(181), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8701.2004.00500.x.
Holden, M., & Scerri, A. (2013). More than this: Liveable Melbourne meets liveable Vancouver. Cities, 31, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.07.013.
Hollands, R. G. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011.
Ivanova, M. (2007). Designing the United Nations Environment Programme: A story of compromise and confrontation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 7(4), 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-007-9052-4.
Ivanova, M. (2010). UNEP in global environmental governance: Design, leadership, location. Global Environmental Politics, 10(1), 30–59. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2010.10.1.30.
Jenkins, P., & Wilkinson, P. (2002). Assessing the growing impact of the global economy on urban development in southern African cities—Case studies in Maputo and Cape Town. Cities, 19(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-2751(01)00044-0.
Jin, J., Gubbi, J., Marusic, S., & Palaniswami, M. (2014). An information framework for creating a smart city through internet of things. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2013.2296516.
Johnson, R. W. (2015). How long will South Africa survive? London: Hurst.
Jonas, A. (2013). City-regionalism as a contingent ‘geopolitics of capitalism’. Geopolitics, 18(2), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.723290.
Jonas, A. & Moisio, S. (2016). City regionalism as geopolitical processes: A new framework for analysis. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516679897.
Jonas, A., While, A., & Gibbs, D. (2004). State modernisation and local strategic selectivity after Local Agenda 21: Evidence from three northern English localities. Policy & Politics, 32(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557304773558125.
Jones, K. (2018). Sierra Club opposes SB 827 [Press release]. Retrieved from http://citizenmarin.org/news/sierra-club-opposes-sb-827/.
Keiner, M., & Kim, A. (2007). Transnational city networks for sustainability. European Planning Studies, 15(10), 1369–1395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701550843.
Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.
Kern, K., Koll, C., & Schophaus, M. (2007). The diffusion of Local Agenda 21 in Germany: Comparing the German federal states. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 604–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419139.
Khilnani, S. (1997). The idea of India. London: Penguin.
Kneebone, E., & Garr, E. (2010). The suburbanization of poverty: Trends in metropolitan America, 2000 to 2008. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Krause, R. M. (2012). An assessment of the impact that participation in local climate networks has on cities’ implementation of climate, energy, and transportation policies. Review of Policy Research, 29(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00582.x.
Krueger, R. (2010). Smart growth and its discontents: An examination of American and European approaches to local and regional sustainable development. Documents d’Anàlisi Geogràfica, 56(3), 409–433.
Kuznetsov, A. S. (2015). Theory and practice of paradiplomacy subnational governments in international affairs. London and New York: Routledge.
Lancashire County Council. (2003a). Local Agenda 21—End of term report. Retrieved from http://www3.lancashire.gov.uk/council/meetings/displayFile.asp?FTYPE=A&FILEID=3329.
Lancashire County Council. (2003b). Local Agenda 21—Second annual progress report. Retrieved from www3.lancashire.gov.uk/council/meetings/displayFile.asp?FTYPE=A&FILEID=439.
Le Faye, D. (1995). Jane Austen’s letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, T. (2013). Global cities and transnational climate change networks. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 108–127. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00156.
Lee, T., & van de Meene, S. (2012). Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network. Policy Sciences, 45(3), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9159-5.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lindblom, C. E. (1977). Politics and markets: The world’s political economic systems. New York: Basic Books.
Llamas-Sanchez, R., Munoz-Fernandez, A., & Maraver-Tarifa, G. (2011). The local Agenda 21 in Andalusia, Spain: A model for sustainable innovation. African Journal of Business Management, 5(32), 12653–12663. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm11.2381.
Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation—The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660325.
Ma, X. L., Liu, C. C., Wen, H. M., Wang, Y. P., & Wu, Y. J. (2017). Understanding commuting patterns using transit smart card data. Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.001.
MacLeod, G. (2013). New urbanism/smart growth in the Scottish Highlands: Mobile policies and post-politics in local development planning. Urban Studies, 50(11), 2196–2221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013491164.
MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance. Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), 503–527.
Magee, L. (2016). Interwoven cities. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Massey, D. (1993). Power-geometries and a progressive sense of place. In J. Bird (Ed.), Mapping the futures: Local cultures, global change. London and New York: Routledge.
McDonald, C., Frost, L., Rainnie, A., & Kirk-Brown, A. (2008). The new regionalism and the role of intermediary organisations in regional development. Paper presented at the Regional Studies Association Annual Conference, Prague, Czech Republic.
Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 70–75.
Moore, S. (2007). Alternative routes to the sustainable city: Austin, Curitiba, and Frankfurt. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Morandi, C., Rolando, A., & Di Vita, S. (2016). From smart city to smart region: Digital services for an internet of places. Cham: Springer.
Mossner, S., & Miller, B. (2015). Sustainability in one place? Dilemmas of sustainability governance in the Frieburg Metropolitan region. Regions, 300(Winter), 19–21.
Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.12.010.
Nwaka, G. I. (1996). Planning sustainable cities in Africa. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 5(1), 119–136.
OECD. (2002). Learning to innovate: Learning regions. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2008). Territorial review: Cape Town metropolitan review. Paris: OECD.
Ogbazi, J. U. (2013). Alternative planning approaches and the sustainable cities programme in Nigeria. Habitat International, 40, 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.03.001.
Osofsky, H. (2005). The geography of climate change litigation: Implications for transnational regulatory governance. Washington University Law Quarterly, 83(6), 1789–1856.
Osofsky, H. (2015). Rethinking the geography of local climate action: Multilevel network participation in metropolitan regions. Utah Law Review, 15(1), 173–240.
Perlman, B. J., & Jimenez, J. (2010). Creative regionalism: Governance for stressful times. State and Local Government Review, 42(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323x10380616.
Portney, K. E. (2003). Taking sustainability seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American cities. Boston: MIT Press.
Pycroft, C. (1998). Integrated development planning or strategic paralysis? Municipal development during the local government transition and beyond. Development Southern Africa, 15(2), 151–163.
Rashidi, K., & Patt, A. (2018). Subsistence over symbolism: The role of transnational municipal networks on cities’ climate policy innovation and adoption. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 23(4), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-017-9747-y.
Reuters. (2016, June 18). California passes France as world’s 6th-largest economy. Rueters. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2016/06/17/california-france-6th-largest-economy/.
Roberts, D., & Diederichs, N. (2002). Durban’s Local Agenda 21 programme: Tackling sustainable development in a post-apartheid city. Environment and Urbanization, 14(1), 189–201.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Mountains in a flat world: Why proximity still matters for the location of economic activity. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn011.
Rogerson, C. (2004). From spatial development initiative to blue IQ: Sub-national economic planning in Gauteng. Urban Forum, 15(1), 74–101.
Rogerson, C. (2009). The turn to ‘new regionalism’: South African reflections. Urban Forum, 20(2), 111–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-009-9057-x.
Rogerson, C., & Rogerson, J. (2015). Johannesburg 2030: The economic contours of a “linking global city”. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550303.
Savitch, H. V., & Adhikari, S. (2017). Fragmented regionalism. Journal of Urban Affairs, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416630626.
Scott, A. (Ed.). (2001). Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scott, J. W. (2007). Smart growth as urban reform: A pragmatic ‘recoding’ of the new regionalism. Urban Studies, 44(1), 15–35.
Scruggs, G. (2017). How Anne Hidalgo plans to get cities to adopt climate action plans by 2020. Retrieved from http://citiscope.org/story/2017/how-anne-hidalgo-plans-get-cities-adopt-climate-action-plans-2020.
Setzer, J. (2015). Testing the boundaries of subnational diplomacy: The international climate action of local and regional governments. Transnational Environmental Law, 4(02), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2047102515000126.
Smart Cities Council. (2016, September 15). About us. Smart Cities Council. Retrieved from https://smartcitiescouncil.com/article/about-us-global.
Smith, M. (2001). Transnational urbanism: Locating globalization. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Soja, E. (2000). Postmetropolis. London and New York: Sage.
Soja, E. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sowman, M., & Brown, A. L. (2006). Mainstreaming environmental sustainability into South Africa’s integrated development planning process. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 49(5), 695–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560600849988.
State Capacity Research Project. (2017). Betrayal of the promise: How South Africa is being stolen. Retrieved from https://pari.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Betrayal-of-the-Promise-25052017.pdf.
Storper, M. (2018). Separate worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization. Journal of Economic Geography, 18(2), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby011.
Suryadevara, N. K., Mukhopadhyay, S. C., Kelly, S. D. T., & Gill, S. P. S. (2015). WSN-based smart sensors and actuator for power management in intelligent buildings. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 20(2), 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmech.2014.2301716.
Swanstrom, T. (2006). Regionalism, equality, and democracy. Urban Affairs Review, 42(2), 249–257.
Tavares, R. (2016). Paradiplomacy: Cities and states as global players. New York: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, P. J. (2012). Extraordinary cities: Early ‘City-ness’ and the origins of agriculture and states. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(3), 415–447.
Thibert, J. (2015). Governing urban regions through collaboration: A view from North America. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Toly, N. (2008). Transnational municipal networks in climate politics: From global governance to global politics. Globalizations, 5(3), 341–356.
Toly, N. (2017). The new urban agenda and the limits of cities. The Hedgehog Review, 19(2), 36–44.
Tomlinson, R. (2017). An argument for metropolitan government in Australia. Cities, 63, 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.013.
Törnqvist, G. (2004). Creativity in time and space. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86(4), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00165.x.
Townsend, A. M. (2013). Smart cities: Big data, civic hackers, and the quest for a new utopia (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
Trapenberg Frick, K. (2013). The actions of discontent: Tea party and property rights activists pushing back against regional planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 79(3), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2013.885312.
UN-Habitat. (2012). History, mandate & role in the UN system. Retrieved from https://unhabitat.org/history-mandate-role-in-the-un-system/.
United Nations. (2017). New urban agenda. Quito: UN Conference of Housing and Sustainable Urban Development. Retrieved from http://habitat3.org/wp-content/uploads/NUA-English.pdf.
Van Hamme, F., & Pion, G. (2012). The relevance of the world-system approach in the era of globalization of economic flows and networks. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 94(1), 65–82.
Van Loon, A. (2018, February 3). Let Cape Town revolutionise the way we think about water. The Guardian (UK). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/feb/04/let-cape-town-revolutionise-the-way-we-think-about-water.
Venter, A. (2007). Integrated development planning as an approach to sustainable development. In G. van Der Waldt (Ed.), Municipal management: Serving the people (p. 93). Cape Town: JUTA Press.
Wallerstein, I. M. (1979). The capitalist world-economy: Essays. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wang, V., & McKinley, J. (2018, March 31). In New York budget, a fusillade against de Blasio. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/31/nyregion/new-york-city-budget-cuomo.html.
Watson, V. (1991). Urbanization policy: Lessons from South America for South Africa? Social Dynamics, 17(2), 155–167.
Watson, V. (2002). Change and continuity in spatial planning: Metropolitan planning in Cape Town under political transition. London and New York: Routledge.
Watson, V. (2013). African urban fantasies: Dreams or nightmares? Environment and Urbanization, 26(1), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813513705.
Weiss, T. G. (2012). What’s wrong with the United Nations and how to fix it (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity.
While, A., Jonas, A., & Gibbs, D. (2004). The environment and the entrepreneurial city: Searching for the urban ‘sustainability; fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 549–569.
Wiig, A. (2015). The empty rhetoric of the smart city: From digital inclusion to economic promotion in Philadelphia. Urban Geography, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1065686.
Yeh, A. (2017). Smart cities in Pacific Asia: Roles of government and private sectors. Paper presented at the Social and Environmental Implications of Smart Cities: Toward a Global Comparative Research Agenda, University of Calgary.
Yigitcanlar, T., O’Connor, K., & Westerman, C. (2008). The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience. Cities, 25(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2008.01.001.
Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Vedlitz, A., Grover, H., & Miller, C. (2008). Vulnerability and capacity: Explaining local commitment to climate-change policy. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 26(3), 544–562. https://doi.org/10.1068/c2g.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dierwechter, Y. (2019). Romancing the City: Three Urbanization(s) of Green Internationalism. In: The Urbanization of Green Internationalism. Cities and the Global Politics of the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01015-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01015-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01014-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01015-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)