Skip to main content

Contending Internationalisms: Times, Spaces, Frames

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 212 Accesses

Part of the book series: Cities and the Global Politics of the Environment ((CGPEP))

Abstract

This chapter engages with recent work on the histories and geographies of “internationalism,” tracing the story back to the early nineteenth century. While the internationalism of nations—of governing the world through a state-created framework—forms an important development of the older Westphalian order mentioned in Chapter 1, this chapter also draws attention to other outlooks and practices, including what Mark Mazower (Governing the world: The history of an idea, 1815 to the present. The Penguin Press, New York, 2012) calls diverse “brotherhoods” around free market ideals, evangelical moralism, anti-slavery campaigns, legal codification, and scientific knowledge as well as to what geographers have similarly charted as the heterogeneity of subaltern movements that challenge hegemonic forms of power and oppression (Featherstone, in Solidarity: Hidden histories and geographies of internationalism. Zed Books, London, New York, 2012; Political Geography, 49: 7–16, 2015; Ferretti, in Political Geography, 63: 10–19, 2018). Resisting the periodization of time, the chapter suggests that both Westphalian and post-Westphalian (or perhaps counter-Westphalian) forms of internationalism have long co-shaped global politics—and are therefore likely to do so in the future as cities gain even more clout. This ultimately requires us to reframe global political narratives that erase non-state spatialities and forms of agency, whether past, present, or future (Herod in Social Science History 27: 501–523, 2004).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, J. (1994). The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/4177090.

  • Agnew, J. (2000). Global political geography beyond geopolitics. International Studies Review, 2(1), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amen, M., Toly, N., McCarney, P., & Segbers, K. (Eds.). (2012). Cities and global governance: New sites for international relations. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined communities : Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antentas, J. (2015). Sliding scale of spaces and dilemmas of internationalism. Antipode, 47(5), 1101–1120. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antentas, J. (2016). Daniel Bensaïd, Melancholic strategist. Historical Materialism, 24(4), 51–106. https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206x-12341500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwell, W. (2014). The rise of cities as global actors: What consequences for policy? Global Policy, 5(3), 374–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barchiesi, F. (2001). Transnational capital, urban globalisation and cross-border solidarity: The case of the South African municipal workers. In P. Waterman & J. Wills (Eds.), Place, space and the new labour internationalisms. Oxford, UK; Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodoni, C. (2013, February 12). A crisis of the state? The end of the postWestphalian model. Retrieved from http://www.socialeurope.eu/author/carlo-bordoni/.

  • Bond, P. (2000). Elite transition: From apartheid to neoliberalism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004). Urban governance and the production of new state spaces in Western Europe, 1960–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 11(3), 447–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/4177507.

  • Brenner, N. (2014). Implosions/explosions: Towards a study of planetary urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennetot, A. (2015). The geographical and ethical origins of neoliberalism: The Walter Lippmann Colloquium and the foundations of a new geopolitical order. Political Geography, 49, 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, C. (2015). The apostle of internationalism: Stephen Duggan and the geopolitics of international education. Political Geography, 49, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, R. (2017). The internationalism of human rights. In G. Sluga & P. Clavin (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, K., & Freytas, M. (2009). Global political cities as actors in twenty-first century international affairs. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(2), 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterton, P., Featherstone, D., & Routledge, P. (2013). Articulating climate justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the commons, and solidarity. Antipode, 45(3), 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01025.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J., & Dauvergne, P. (2008). Paths to a green world: The political economy of the global environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavel, P. (1986). The progressive city. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavin, P. (2017). Men and markets: Global capital and the international economy. In G. Sluga & P. Clavel (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, S. (Ed.). (2014). The power of cities in international relations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, S. (2016). Cities and global governance: State failure or a new global order? Millennium, 44(3), 455–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816637233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (2002). A tale of three cities: Or the globalization of city management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Didier, S., Morange, M., & Peyroux, E. (2013). The adaptative nature of neoliberalism at the local scale: Fifteen years of city improvement districts in Cape Town and Johannesburg. Antipode, 45(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00987.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierwechter, Y. (2017). Urban sustainability through smart growth: Greater Seattle, intercurrence, and the new geography of regional development. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, R. (Ed.). (2009). The city in American political development. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelke, P. (2013). Foreign policy for an urban world: Global governance and the rise of cities. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, D. (2012). Solidarity: Hidden histories and geographies of internationalism. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, D. (2015). Maritime labour and subaltern geographies of internationalism: Black internationalist seafarers’ organising in the interwar period. Political Geography, 49, 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti, F. (2018). Geographies of internationalism: Radical development and critical geopolitics from the Northeast of Brazil. Political Geography, 63, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, M. (1998). Nationalism and the international labor movement: The idea of the nation in socialist and anarchist theory. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankowski, P. (2010). One world-many orders? In S. Krishna-Hensel (Ed.), Order and disorder in the international system. Farnham: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2013). Political order and political decay. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, S. (1999). A short history of neoliberalism: Twenty years of elite economics and emerging opportunities for structural change. Paper presented at the Conference on Economic Sovereignty in a Globalizing World, Bangkok.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, J. (2009). Critical geography I: The question of internationalism. Progress in Human Geography, 33(5), 685–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508101602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunder, M. (2010). Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space. Planning Theory, 9(4), 298–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackworth, J. (2007). The neoliberal city: Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, M. (1974). Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, H., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayman, P., & Williams, J. (2006). Westphalian sovereignty: Rights, intervention, meaning and context. Global Society, 20(4), 521–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820600929879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herod, A. (2004). Geographies of labor internationalism. Social Science History, 27(4), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0145553200012669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrschel, T. (2013). Cities, state and globalisation. City-regional governance in Europe and North America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrschel, T., & Newman, P. (2017). Cities as international actors: Urban and regional governance beyond the nation state. London and New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, J., Legg, S., & Heffernan, M. (2015). Introduction: Historical geographies of internationalism, 1900–1950. Political Geography, 49, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.09.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodos, J. (2009). Against expectionalism: Intercurrence and intergovernmental relations in Britain and the United States. In R. Dilworth (Ed.), The city in American political development (pp. 44–63). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imlay, T. (2017). Socialist internationalism after 1914. In G. Sluga & P. Clavin (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history (pp. 213–242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iriye, A. (2017). Forward. In G. Sluga & P. Clavin (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, A. (2012). City-regionalism as a contingent ‘geopolitics of capitalism’. Geopolitics, 18(2), 284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonas, A. (2015, October 8–9). Variegated city regionalisms: The geopolitics of city-region building. Paper presented at the Smart City-Regional Governance, Cosmopolis, Centre for Urban Policy Research, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1973). Power and interdependence. Survival, 15(4), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396337308441409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna-Hensel, S. (2010). Order and disorder in the international system. Farnham: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2013). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time, and everyday life. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsett, S., & Marks, G. (2000). It didn’t happen here: Why socialism failed in the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. (2015). Urban governance and the American political development approach. Urban Affairs Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415620054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, N. (2008). Nature’s new deal. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J. T. (1997). Power shift. (changing role of central government). Foreign Affairs, 76(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.2307/20047909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazower, M. (2012). Governing the world: The history of an idea, 1815 to the present. New York: The Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, A. (2013). The urban question under planetary urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01189.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. L. (1989). Lewis Mumford, a life. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisio, S. (2018). Urbanizing the nation-state? Notes on the geopolitical growth of cities and city-regions. Urban Geography, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2018.1454685.

  • Monbiot, G. (2000). Captive state: The corporate takeover of Britain. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K. (2007). The polycentric state: New spaces of empowerment and engagement? Regional Studies, 41(9), 1237–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E. (2009). Failed states and international order: Constructing a post-Westphalian world. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260903326479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noortmann, M., Reinisch, A., & Ryngaert, C. (2015). Non-state actors in international law. Oxford; Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (1996). Institutions and intercurrence: Theory building in the fullness of time. Nomos XXXVII, Political Order, 38, 111–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2004). The search for American political development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2008). Remaking laissez-faire. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507084816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1977). The choreography of existence: Comments on Hagerstrand’s time-geography and its usefulness. Economic Geography, 53, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffin, F. (2013). Municipal international relations: The South African case of metropolitan eThekwini. Loyola Journal of Social Sciences, XXVII(1), 119–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, J. (2015). Debating a post-Westphalian international order. Mainstream Weekly, LIII(15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, H., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Global cities and the governance of climate change: What is the role of law in cities. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36, 314–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (2001). Globalization and the rise of city regions. European Planning Studies, 9(7), 813–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabrooke, L. (2002). Bringing legitimacy back in to neo-Weberian state theory and international relations (Working Paper No. 6). Department of International Relations. Canberra: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, J. M. (2002). Governing from below: Urban regions and the global economy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skowronek, S. (1982). Building a new American state: The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire] and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (1997). The real new world order. Foreign Affairs, Sept/Oct, 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, G., & Clavin, P. (2017a). Rethinking the history of internationalism. In G. Sluga & P. Clavin (Eds.), Internationalisms: A twentieth century history (pp. 3–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluga, G., & Clavin, P. (Eds.). (2017b). Internationalisms: A twentieth-century history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, T. (1998). Conquests and cultures: An international history (1st ed.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffek, J. (2015). Fascist internationalism. Millennium, 44(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829815581870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steger, M. (2002). Globalism. Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C., & Whelan, R. (2009). Through the glass darkly: The once and future study of urban politics. In R. Dilworth (Ed.), The city in American political development. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, P. (2002). Capitalists against markets: The making of labor markets and welfare states in the United States and Sweden. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2005). New political geographies: Global civil society and global governance through world city networks. Political Geography, 24(6), 703–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N., & Amin, A. (2002). Cities: Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toly, N. (2017). The new urban agenda and the limits of cities. The Hedgehog Review, 19(2), 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (2015). Building a better theory of the urban: A response to ‘Towards a new epistemology of the urban?’ City, 19(2–3), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2015.1024073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, P., & Wills, J. (2001). Place, space and the new labour internationalisms. Oxford, UK; Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, P., & Wills, J. (2012). Place, space and the new labor internationalisms: Beyond the fragments? In P. Waterman & J. Wills (Eds.), Place, space and the new labour internationalisms. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dierwechter, Y. (2019). Contending Internationalisms: Times, Spaces, Frames. In: The Urbanization of Green Internationalism. Cities and the Global Politics of the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01015-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01015-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01014-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01015-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics