Advertisement

Biodiesel pp 161-192 | Cite as

Biodiesel Production and Consumption: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Approach

  • Mohammad Ali RajaeifarEmail author
  • Meisam TabatabaeiEmail author
  • Mortaza Aghbashlo
  • Saeed Sadeghzadeh Hemayati
  • Reinout Heijungs
Chapter
Part of the Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies book series (BBT, volume 8)

Abstract

Like all energy carriers including renewable energies, the production to combustion cycle of biodiesel should also be assessed from the sustainability point of view. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a promising approach capable of assisting decision makers to find the environmental consequences of the existing or future biodiesel production plans. For instance, for different feedstocks, production technologies, downstream processes implemented, etc., an LCA of biodiesel production cycles could result in different recommendations ranging from agricultural practices to production and combustion stages. Despite the fact that an ISO standard is available for conducting LCA studies, there are still many challenging issues faced when performing LCA studies concerning biodiesel production and consumption. These challenges include the functional unit, the choice of system boundaries, the impact categories to be assessed, the treatment of land use change, and biogenic carbon. The present chapter provides a systematic overview of the above-mentioned topics with the aim of shedding light on various aspects of LCA of biodiesel production and consumption cycle.

Keywords

Biodiesel Life cycle assessment Land use change Water footprint Production Combustion 

References

  1. Aghbashlo M, Tabatabaei M, Mohammadi P, Khoshnevisan B, Rajaeifar MA, Pakzad M (2017) Neat diesel beats waste-oriented biodiesel from the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental point of views. Energy Convers Manag 148:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altamirano CAA, Yokoyama L, de Medeiros JL, Araújo OdQF (2016) Ethylic or methylic route to soybean biodiesel? Tracking environmental answers through life cycle assessment. Appl Energy 184:1246–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashokkumar V, Salim MR, Salam Z, Sivakumar P, Chong CT, Elumalai S, Suresh V, Ani FN (2017) Production of liquid biofuels (biodiesel and bioethanol) from brown marine macroalgae Padina tetrastromatica. Energy Convers Manag 135:351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baitz M (2017) Attributional life cycle assessment. In: Curran M (ed) Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. The complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  5. Baskar G, Aiswarya R (2016) Trends in catalytic production of biodiesel from various feedstocks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57:496–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bauen A, Chudziak C, Vad K, Watson P (2010) A causal descriptive approach to modelling the GHG emissions associated with the indirect land use impacts of biofuels. E4Tech, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumann H, Tillman A-M (2004) The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA. An orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application. External OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  8. Ben Aoun W, Gabrielle B (2016) Life cycle assessment and land-use changes: effectiveness and limitations. In: Gnansounou E, Pandey A (eds) Life-cycle assessment of biorefineries. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  9. Ben Aoun W, Gabrielle B, Gagnepain B (2013) The importance of land use change in the environmental balance of biofuels. In: Oilseeds and fats, crops and lipids, vol 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birkved M, Hauschild MZ (2006) PestLCI—a model for estimating field emissions of pesticides in agricultural LCA. Ecol Model 198:433–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boulay A-M, Bulle C, Bayart J-B, Deschênes L, Margni M (2011) Regional characterization of freshwater use in LCA: modeling direct impacts on human health. Environ Sci Technol 45:8948–8957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brander M, Tipper R, Hutchison C, Davis G (2008) Technical paper: consequential and attributional approaches to LCA: a guide to policy makers with specific reference to greenhouse gas LCA of biofuels. Econometrica PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Brentrup F, Küsters J, Lammel J, Kuhlmann H (2000) Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherubini F, Strømman AH (2011) Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Biores Technol 102:437–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choo YM, Muhamad H, Hashim Z, Subramaniam V, Puah CW, Tan Y (2011) Determination of GHG contributions by subsystems in the oil palm supply chain using the LCA approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:669–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Curran MA (2007) Co-product and input allocation approaches for creating life cycle inventory data: a literature review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12:65–78Google Scholar
  17. Curran MA (2017) Overview of goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. In: LCA compendium—The complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer, pp 1–62Google Scholar
  18. Dalgaard R, Schmidt J, Halberg N, Christensen P, Thrane M, Pengue WA (2008) LCA of soybean meal. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Demirbas A (2009) Biodiesel from waste cooking oil via base-catalytic and supercritical methanol transesterification. Energy Convers Manag 50:923–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Demirbas MF (2011) Biofuels from algae for sustainable development. Appl Energy 88:3473–3480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dufour J, Iribarren D (2012) Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from free fatty acid-rich wastes. Renew Energy 38:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ekvall T, Finnveden G (2001) Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review. J Clean Prod 9:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks. In: The triple bottom line of 21st century, vol 73Google Scholar
  25. Elshout PM, van Zelm R, Karuppiah R, Laurenzi IJ, Huijbregts MA (2014) A spatially explicit data-driven approach to assess the effect of agricultural land occupation on species groups. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:758–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Escobar N, Ribal J, Clemente G, Sanjuán N (2014) Consequential LCA of two alternative systems for biodiesel consumption in Spain, considering uncertainty. J Clean Prod 79:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manage 91:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fritz S, See L, Valin H (2013) Current issues and uncertainties in estimating global land availability for biofuel production. Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  29. Georgogianni K, Kontominas M, Pomonis P, Avlonitis D, Gergis V (2008) Conventional and in situ transesterification of sunflower seed oil for the production of biodiesel. Fuel Process Technol 89:503–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ghobadian B, Rahimi H, Nikbakht A, Najafi G, Yusaf T (2009) Diesel engine performance and exhaust emission analysis using waste cooking biodiesel fuel with an artificial neural network. Renew Energy 34:976–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gnansounou E, Panichelli L, Dauriat A, Villegas JD (2008) Accounting for indirect land-use changes in GHG balances of biofuels: review of current approachesGoogle Scholar
  32. Guinée J, Heijungs R (2017) Introduction to life cycle assessment. In: Sustainable supply chains. Springer, pp 15–41Google Scholar
  33. Guinée JB (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7:311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris Z, Spake R, Taylor G (2015) Land use change to bioenergy: a meta-analysis of soil carbon and GHG emissions. Biomass Bioenergy 82:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hauschild MZ, Huijbregts MAJ (2015) Introducing life cycle impact assessment. In: Life cycle impact assessment. Springer, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  36. Hawkins TR, Singh B, Majeau-Bettez G, Strømman AH (2013) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 17:53–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heijungs R, Guinée JB (2007) Allocation and ‘what-if’scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. Waste Manag 27:997–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heijungs R, Wiloso EI (2014) Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems. In: Wang L (ed) Sustainable bioenergy production, pp 99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hodaifa G, Ochando-Pulido J, Rodriguez-Vives S, Martinez-Ferez A (2013) Optimization of continuous reactor at pilot scale for olive-oil mill wastewater treatment by Fenton-like process. Chem Eng J 220:117–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hosenuzzaman M, Rahim N, Selvaraj J, Hasanuzzaman M, Malek A, Nahar A (2015) Global prospects, progress, policies, and environmental impact of solar photovoltaic power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:284–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ibenholt K (2002) Materials flow analysis and economic modelling. In: Handbook of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 177–184Google Scholar
  42. IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Agriculture, forestry and other land use, vol. 4. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  43. ISO14044 (2006) Environmental management. Life cycle assessment requirements and guidelines. ISO 14044 International Standard International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  44. ISO14045 (2012) Environmental management—eco-efficiency assessment of product systems—principles, requirements and guidelines. ISO 14045 International Standard International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  45. ISO14046 (2014). Environmental management—water footprint—principles, requirements and guidelines. ISO 14046 International Standard International Organization for StandardizationGoogle Scholar
  46. Jiaqiang E, Liu T, Yang W, Li J, Gong J, Deng Y (2016) Effects of fatty acid methyl esters proportion on combustion and emission characteristics of a biodiesel fueled diesel engine. Energy Convers Manag 117:410–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jørgensen A, Bikker P, Herrmann IT (2012) Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions from poultry fat biodiesel. J Clean Prod 24:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khoshnevisan B, Rafiee S, Tabatabaei M, Ghanavati H, Mohtasebi SS, Rahimi V, Shafiei M, Angelidaki I, Karimi K (2017) Life cycle assessment of castor-based biorefinery: a well to wheel LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1–18Google Scholar
  49. Kim S, Dale BE (2011) Indirect land use change for biofuels: testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies. Biomass Bioenergy 35:3235–3240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kumara AS, Maheswarb D, Reddyc KVK (2009) Comparison of diesel engine performance and emissions from neat and transesterified cotton seed oil. Jordan J Mech Ind Eng 3Google Scholar
  51. Lee RA, Lavoie J-M (2013) From first-to third-generation biofuels: challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity. Anim Front 3:6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee W-J, Liu Y-C, Mwangi FK, Chen W-H, Lin S-L, Fukushima Y, Liao C-N, Wang L-C (2011) Assessment of energy performance and air pollutant emissions in a diesel engine generator fueled with water-containing ethanol–biodiesel–diesel blend of fuels. Energy 36:5591–5599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liew WL, Kassim MA, Muda K, Loh SK, Affam AC (2015) Conventional methods and emerging wastewater polishing technologies for palm oil mill effluent treatment: a review. J Environ Manag 149:222–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lim S, Lee KT (2011) Parallel production of biodiesel and bioethanol in palm-oil-based biorefineries: life cycle assessment on the energy and greenhouse gases emissions. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 5:132–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lim SL, Wu TY, Clarke C (2014) Treatment and biotransformation of highly polluted agro-industrial wastewater from a palm oil mill into vermicompost using earthworms. J Agric Food Chem 62:691–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lin J, Babbitt CW, Trabold TA (2013) Life cycle assessment integrated with thermodynamic analysis of bio-fuel options for solid oxide fuel cells. Biores Technol 128:495–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ma F, Hanna MA (1999) Biodiesel production: a review. Biores Technol 70:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Malça J, Freire F (2011) Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: a review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:338–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Martin B (2017) Attributional life cycle assessment. In: Curran MA (ed) Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. LCA compendium—The complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer, pp 123–143Google Scholar
  60. Mohammadi P, Nikbakht AM, Tabatabaei M, Farhadi K, Mohebbi A (2012) Experimental investigation of performance and emission characteristics of DI diesel engine fueled with polymer waste dissolved in biodiesel-blended diesel fuel. Energy 46:596–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morais TG, Teixeira RF, Domingos T (2016) Regionalization of agri-food life cycle assessment: a review of studies in Portugal and recommendations for the future. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:875–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moreno AO, Dorantes L, Galíndez J, Guzmán RI (2003) Effect of different extraction methods on fatty acids, volatile compounds, and physical and chemical properties of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) oil. J Agric Food Chem 51:2216–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Motasemi F, Ani FN (2012) A review on microwave-assisted production of biodiesel. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:4719–4733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mutel CL, Hellweg S (2009) Regionalized life cycle assessment: computational methodology and application to inventory databases. Environ Sci Technol 43:5797–5803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nemecek T, Schnetzer J, Reinhard J (2016) Updated and harmonised greenhouse gas emissions for crop inventories. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:1361–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nicoletti G, Arcuri N, Nicoletti G, Bruno R (2015) A technical and environmental comparison between hydrogen and some fossil fuels. Energy Convers Manag 89:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Overmars KP, Stehfest E, Ros JP, Prins AG (2011) Indirect land use change emissions related to EU biofuel consumption: an analysis based on historical data. Environ Sci Policy 14:248–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Panichelli L, Dauriat A, Gnansounou E (2009) Life cycle assessment of soybean-based biodiesel in Argentina for export. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:144–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Plevin RJ, Beckman J, Golub AA, Witcover J, O’Hare M (2015) Carbon accounting and economic model uncertainty of emissions from biofuels-induced land use change. Environ Sci Technol 49:2656–2664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Prox M, Curran MA (2017) Consequential life cycle assessment. In: Curran MA (ed) Goal and scope definition in life cycle assessment. LCA compendium—The complete world of life cycle assessment. Springer, pp 145–160Google Scholar
  71. Rajaeifar MA, Abdi R, Tabatabaei M (2017a) Expanded polystyrene waste application for improving biodiesel environmental performance parameters from life cycle assessment point of view. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:278–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rajaeifar MA, Akram A, Ghobadian B, Rafiee S, Heidari MD (2014) Energy-economic life cycle assessment (LCA) and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of olive oil production in Iran. Energy 66:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rajaeifar MA, Akram A, Ghobadian B, Rafiee S, Heijungs R, Tabatabaei M (2016) Environmental impact assessment of olive pomace oil biodiesel production and consumption: a comparative lifecycle assessment. Energy 106:87–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rajaeifar MA, Ghobadian B, Davoud Heidari M, Fayyazi E (2013) Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of biodiesel production from rapeseed in Iran. J Renew Sustain Energy 5:063134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rajaeifar MA, Tabatabaei M, Abdi R, Latifi AM, Saberi F, Askari M, Zenouzi A, Ghorbani M (2017b) Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of using waste cooking oil-and poultry fat-based biodiesel blends in urban buses: a real-world operation condition study. Biofuel Res J 4:638–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Reijnders L, Huijbregts M (2008) Biogenic greenhouse gas emissions linked to the life cycles of biodiesel derived from European rapeseed and Brazilian soybeans. J Clean Prod 16:1943–1948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Reinhard J, Zah R (2011) Consequential life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of an increased rapemethylester (RME) production in Switzerland. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2361–2373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sáez-Bastante J, Ortega-Román C, Pinzi S, Lara-Raya F, Leiva-Candia D, Dorado M (2015) Ultrasound-assisted biodiesel production from Camelina sativa oil. Biores Technol 185:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Salaa O, Saxa D, Lesliea H (2009) Biodiversity consequences of increased biofuel production. In: Howarth RW, Bringezu S (eds) Environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use. Proceedings of the scientific committee on problems of the environment (scope) international biofuels project rapid assessment, Gummersbach Germany, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  80. Sander K, Murthy GS (2010) Life cycle analysis of algae biodiesel. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:704–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schmidt J (2007) Life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Thesis, Part 3: Life cycle inventory of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, AalborgGoogle Scholar
  82. Schmidt JH (2010) Comparative life cycle assessment of rapeseed oil and palm oil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:183–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A, Fabiosa J, Tokgoz S, Hayes D, Yu T-H (2008) Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:1238–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Seppälä J, Posch M, Johansson M, Hettelingh J-P (2006) Country-dependent characterisation factors for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication based on accumulated exceedance as an impact category indicator (14 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:403–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Shah S, Sharma A, Gupta M (2005) Extraction of oil from Jatropha curcas L. seed kernels by combination of ultrasonication and aqueous enzymatic oil extraction. Biores Technol 96:121–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sheehan J, Camobreco V, Duffield J, Graboski M, Shapouri H (1998) Life cycle inventory of biodiesel and petroleum diesel for use in an urban bus. Final report. National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO (US)Google Scholar
  87. Singh A, Olsen SI, Nigam PS (2011) A viable technology to generate third-generation biofuel. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:1349–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Singh A, Olsen SI, Pant D (2013) Importance of life cycle assessment of renewable energy sources. In: Life cycle assessment of renewable energy sources. Springer, pp1–11Google Scholar
  89. Sousa VM, Luz SM, Caldeira-Pires A, Machado FS, Silveira CM (2017) Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from beef tallow in Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 22:1837–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stojković IJ, Stamenković OS, Povrenović DS, Veljković VB (2014) Purification technologies for crude biodiesel obtained by alkali-catalyzed transesterification. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 32:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Styles D, Jones MB (2007) Energy crops in Ireland: quantifying the potential life-cycle greenhouse gas reductions of energy-crop electricity. Biomass Bioenergy 31:759–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thomassen MA, Dalgaard R, Heijungs R, De Boer I (2008) Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tran D-T, Chang J-S, Lee D-J (2017) Recent insights into continuous-flow biodiesel production via catalytic and non-catalytic transesterification processes. Appl Energy 185:376–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. UNCED (1992) Report of the united nation conference on environment and developmentGoogle Scholar
  95. van Dam J, Junginger M, Faaij AP (2010) From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2445–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Van Zutphen J, Wijbrans R (2012) LCA GHG emissions in production and combustion of Malaysian palm oil biodiesel. J Oil Palm Environ Health (JOPEH) 2Google Scholar
  97. Verones F, Saner D, Pfister S, Baisero D, Rondinini C, Hellweg S (2013) Effects of consumptive water use on biodiversity in wetlands of international importance. Environ Sci Technol 47:12248–12257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Watson R, Noble I, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo D, Andrasko K, Apps M, Brown S, Farquhar G, Goldberg D (2000) Summary for policymakers: land use, land-use change, and forestryGoogle Scholar
  99. Weidema B, Wenzel H, Petersen C, Hansen K (2004) The product, functional unit and reference flows in LCA. Environ News 70:1–46Google Scholar
  100. Wiloso EI, Heijungs R (2013) Key issues in conducting life cycle assessment of bio-based renewable energy sources. In: Life cycle assessment of renewable energy sources. Springer, pp 13–36Google Scholar
  101. Wolf M-A, Chomkhamsri K, Brandao M, Pant R, Ardente F, Pennington DW, Manfredi S, de Camillis C, Goralczyk M (2010). ILCD handbook-general guide for life cycle assessment-detailed guidanceGoogle Scholar
  102. Wu M, Wu Y, Wang M (2008) Mobility chains analysis of technologies for passenger cars and light duty vehicles fueled with biofuels: application of the Greet model to project the role of biomass in America’s energy future (RBAEF) project. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL)Google Scholar
  103. Xue X, Collinge WO, Shrake SO, Bilec MM, Landis AE (2012) Regional life cycle assessment of soybean derived biodiesel for transportation fleets. Energy Policy 48:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Yu N, Xing D, Li W, Yang Y, Li Z, Li Y, Ren N (2017) Electricity and methane production from soybean edible oil refinery wastewater using microbial electrochemical systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 42:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zamagni A, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Masoni P, Raggi A (2012) Lights and shadows in consequential LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:904–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Ali Rajaeifar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Meisam Tabatabaei
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Mortaza Aghbashlo
    • 3
  • Saeed Sadeghzadeh Hemayati
    • 4
  • Reinout Heijungs
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.Biofuel Research Team (BRTeam)KarajIran
  2. 2.Microbial Biotechnology DepartmentAgricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)KarajIran
  3. 3.Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Department of Agricultural Machinery EngineeringUniversity College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of TehranTehranIran
  4. 4.Sugar Beet Seed Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO)KarajIran
  5. 5.Department of Econometrics and Operations ResearchVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations