Advertisement

Prediction of Crop Yields Based on Fuzzy Rule-Based System (FRBS) Using the Takagi Sugeno-Kang Approach

  • Kalpesh Borse
  • Prasit G. AgnihotriEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 866)

Abstract

Predicting the effects of climate change on crop yields requires a model and its parameters, how crops respond to weather. Predictions from different models often disagree with the climatic variables and its impact. A common approach is to use statistical models trained on historical yields and some simplified measurements of weather, such as growing season average temperature and precipitation. Climate change is really concern to the entire world. Its direct impact on the crop growth and yield is very important to understand. In the present study Fuzzy logic crop yield model was developed by considering different climate change variables. Temperature, Rainfall, evaporation, humidity parameters are considered for the crop yield model. Model is being developed by considering the 15-year crop yield data and same period for the climatic variables. Triangular membership function is being adopted in the fuzzy model. In this study a fuzzy rule-based system (FRBS) using the Takagi Sugeno-Kang approach has been used for the developing the crop yield model. Model is validated by coefficient of correlation, and found that, there is more than 0.9 coefficient of correlation between observed and evaluated yield.

Keywords

Takagi Sugeno-Kang approach Crop yield Climate change Fuzzy logic 

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal, R., Jain, R.C., Mehta, S.C.: Yield forecast based on weather variables and agricultural inputs on agro-climatic zone basis. Ind. J. Agri. Sci. 71(7), 487–490 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huda, A.K.S., Ghildyal, B.P., Tomar, V.S., Jain, R.C.: Contribution of climate variables in predicting rice yield. Agric. Met. 15, 71–86 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chowdhury, A., Sarkar, M.B.: Estimation of rice yield through weather factors in a dry sub-humid region. Mausam 32(4), 393–396 (1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jang, J.S.R., Sun, C.T., Mizutani, E.: Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing, a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. Prentice Hall, NJ, USA (1997). ISBN 0-13-261066-3Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Loukas, Y.L.: Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system: an instant and architecture-free predictor for improved QSAR studies. J. Med. Chem. 44(17), 2772–2783 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jang, J.-S.R.: ANFIS: adaptive network-based fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 23, 665–685 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, B., Park, J.H., Kim, B.S.: Fuzzy logic model of Langmuir probe discharge data. Comput. Chem. 26(6), 573–581 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nayak, P.C., Sudheer, K.P., Rangan, D.M., Ramasastri, K.S.: A neuro-fuzzy computing technique for modelling hydrological time series. J. Hydrology 291, 52–66 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takagi, T., Sugeno, M.: Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 15, 116–132 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kokate, K.D., Sananse, S.L., Kadam, J.R.: Pre-harvest forecasting of rice yield in Konkan region of Maharashtra. J. Maha. Agric. Univ. 25(3), 289–293 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jones, A.J.: New tools in non-linear modeling and prediction. CMS 1(2), 109–149 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentSardar Vallbhbhai National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations