Advertisement

Framework for Faction of Data in Social Network Using Link Based Mining Process

  • B. Bazeer AhamedEmail author
  • D. Yuvaraj
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 866)

Abstract

Recent online social networks such as Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn have hurriedly grown in reputation. The resulting accessibility of a social network data supplies an unparalleled occasion for data analysis and mining researchers to resolve useful and semantic information in a broad range of fields such as social sciences, marketing, management, and security. Still, unprocessed social network data are enormous, noisy, scattered, and susceptible in nature, in which some challenges is faced when applying data mining tools and analyzing tasks in storage, efficiency, accuracy, etc. In addition to that there are many problems related to the data collection and data conversion steps in social network data preparation. We focused on the endeavor for privacy preserving social network conversion which provides method for better protection and identification of privacy for social network users and to maintain the convenience of social network data.

Keywords

Social network Social network analysis Link mining Learning model 

References

  1. 1.
    Gupta, P., Bhatnagar, V.: Data preprocessing for dynamic social network analysis. In: Data Mining in Dynamic Social Networks and Fuzzy Systems. IGI Global (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charu, C.: Aggarwal. Social Network Data Analytics. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, C.: By the numbers: 220 amazing twitter statistics. WWW page (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sengstock, C., Gertz, M.: Latent geographic feature extraction from social media. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, SIGSPATIAL 2012, pp. 149–158 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Emarketer. Worldwide social network users: 2013 forecast and comparative estimates. WWW page, June 2013Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tatham, M.: Experian marketing services reveals 27 percent of time spent online is on social networking. WWW page, April 2013Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sofean, M., Smith, M.: A real-time architecture for detection of diseases using social networks: design, implementation and evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, HT 2012, pp. 309–310 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sun, X., Wang, H., Li, J., Pei, J.: Publishing anonymous survey rating data. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 23(3), 379–406 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tan, E., Guo, L., Chen, S., Zhang, X., Zhao, Y.: Spammer behavior analysis and detection in user generated content on social networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 32nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, ICDCS 2012, pp. 305–314 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, Y., Wu, X., Wu, L.: Differential privacy preserving spectral graph analysis. In: Pei, Jian, Tseng, Vincent S., Cao, Longbing, Motoda, Hiroshi, Xu, Guandong (eds.) PAKDD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7819, pp. 329–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37456-2_28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wondracek, G., Holz, T., Kirda, E., Kruegel, C.: A practical attack to de-anonymize social network users. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, SP 2010, pp. 223–238 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xiao, Q., Chen, R., Tan, K.L.: Differentially private network data release via structural inference. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2014, pp. 911–920 (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yue, Wang, Xintao, Wu: Preserving differential privacy in degree correlation based graph generation. ACM Trans. Data Privacy 6, 127–145 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhao, W.X., Jiang, J., Weng, J., He, J., Lim, E.P., Yan, H., Li, X.: Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. In: Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Advances in Information Retrieval, ECIR 2011, pp. 338–349 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen, S., Zhou, S.: Recursive mechanism: towards node differential privacy and unrestricted joins. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD 2013, pp. 653–664 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringBalaji Institute of Technology and ScienceWarangalIndia
  2. 2.Department of Communication and Computer EngineeringCihan UniversityErbil, Kurdistan RegionIraq

Personalised recommendations