Advertisement

Representativeness and Development of Leaders in Korea TESOL

  • Robert J. DickeyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

Language teacher associations (LTAs) often face challenges in terms of leadership continuity and representativeness. While leadership development and turnover are issues facing all voluntary groups, these are particularly challenging in EFL contexts where a significant proportion of the membership may not be permanent residents. Korea TESOL (KOTESOL) is typical of one of the varieties of TESOL teacher associations where expatriates comprise the majority of members and leaders. This retrospective, descriptive, and document-based case study analyzed representativeness of leaders through the gender, nationality, workplace, and education of leaders and members across two decades, as well as the continuity (retention) and development of leaders across the organization’s leadership ranks. Important considerations for diversity and representativeness include identification and role of stakeholders and members through demographic analysis, as well as organizational history and culture. No less important is enabling diversity and representation, which might be addressed through term limits, representatives from natural constituencies and interest groups, and awareness of the need for a broad-based leadership. This examination of Korea TESOL during the period 1997–2017 finds that while levels varied across time, substantive representation is in place, although numerous improvements can be made.

References

  1. Aubrey, J., & Coombe, C. (2010). The TESOL Arabia conference and its role in the professional development of teachers at institutions of higher education in the United Arab Emirates. Academic Leadership Journal, 8(3), 53.Google Scholar
  2. BoardSource. (2010). Nonprofit governance index 2010. Washington, DC: Boardsource. Retrieved from http://www.performingartsconvention.org/file/BoardSource%20Nonprofit%20Governance%20Index%202010.pdf.
  3. BoardSource. (2015). Leading with intent: A national index of nonprofit board practices. Washington, DC: Boardsource. Retrieved from https://my.boardsource.org/eweb/pdf/LWI-Report.pdf.
  4. Day, D. V. (2001). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dickey, R. (2016). Glass ceilings? Sticky floors? Women in TESOL leadership. Fourth Estate, 32(4), 31–33.Google Scholar
  6. Gazley, B., Chang, W. K., & Bingham, L. B. (2010). Board diversity, stakeholder representation, and collaborative performance in community mediation centers. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 610–620.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02182.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo, C., & Marietta, M. (2015). Value of voices, voice of values: Participatory and value representation in networked governance. In J. M. Bryson, B. C. Crosby, & L. Bloomberg (Eds.), Creating public value in practice: Advancing the common good in a multi-sector, shared-power, wholly-in-charge world (pp. 67–88). Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo, C., & Musso, J. A. (2007). Representation in nonprofit and voluntary organizations: A conceptual framework [Research Note]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 308–326.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006289764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Houle, G. (1997). Governing boards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. G. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2016). The non-native English speaker teachers in TESOL movement. ELT Journal, 70(2), 180–189.  https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, M., & Mason, D. P. (2017). Representation and diversity, advocacy, and nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly (Advance Access, 1–23).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764017728364.
  13. Korea Immigration Service. (1997). 1997 nyeon chulibguk gwanriguk tonggye yeonbo [Immigration bureau statistical yearbook of 1997]. Retrieved from http://www.hikorea.go.kr/ptimg/moj_sts/1997/index.html.
  14. Korea Immigration Service. (2004). 2004 nyeondo chulibguk gwanriguk tonggye yeonbo [Immigration bureau statistical yearbook of 2004]. Retrieved from http://www.hikorea.go.kr/ptimg/moj_sts/2004/index.html.
  15. Korea Immigration Service. (2010). 2010 nyeondo chulibguk gwanriguk tonggye yeonbo [Immigration bureau statistical yearbook of 2010]. Retrieved from http://immigration.go.kr/HP/COM/bbs_003/BoardList.do?strNbodCd=noti0096&strOrgGbnCd=104000&strFilePath=imm/&strRtnURL=IMM_6050.
  16. Korea Immigration Service. (2017). 2017 nyeon 11 wolho chulipguk wegukin jeongchaek tonggye wolbo [November 2017 monthly report on immigration foreign policy]. Retrieved from http://immigration.go.kr/HP/COM/bbs_003/BoardList.do?strNbodCd=noti0096&strOrgGbnCd=104000&strFilePath=imm/&strRtnURL=IMM_6050.
  17. Korean Educational Development Institute. (2016). Brief statistics on Korean Education (English). Seoul: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://kess.kedi.re.kr/eng/publ/view?survSeq=2016&publSeq=4&menuSeq=0&itemCode=02&language=en#.
  18. Mayne, R. (2015, December 15). Let’s get the best! [web blog post]. In Gender Equality ELT~Examining the gender balance in ELT. Retrieved from https://genderequalityelt.wordpress.com/2015/12/15/lets-get-the-best/.
  19. Michels, R. (1915). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy (E. Paul & C. Paul, Trans.). NY: Hearsts International Library Company. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/politicalparties00mich.
  20. Mosher, F. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Motteram, G. (2016). Membership, belonging, and identity in the twenty-first century. ELT Journal, 70(2), 150–159.  https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Murray, P. (2012). “Much leeway needs to be made up in our equipment”: Muintir na Tire and US scholarships for Irish sociology students, 1958–59. Irish Journal of Sociology, 20(1), 65–83.  https://doi.org/10.7227/lJS.20.1.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nobre, V. (2011). Recruitment and retention of volunteers. In S. Gómez (Ed.), Running an association for language teachers: Directions and opportunities (pp. 31–35). Canterbury, England: IATEFL and the British Council.Google Scholar
  24. Overto, G. W., & Frey, J. C. (2002). Guidebook for directors of nonprofit corporations (2nd ed.). Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
  25. PMA Consulting. (n.d.). Evaluating your board and its members [web blog post]. Retrieved from http://pattonmcdowell.com/evaluating-your-board-its-members/.
  26. Stewart, A., & Miyahara, M. (2016). Language teacher associations in Japan: Knowledge producers and/or knowledge disseminators. ELT Journal, 70(2), 137–149.  https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thorkelson, T. S. (2016). Language teaching organizations and professional job satisfaction. Korea TESOL Journal, 12(1), 67–105. Retrieved from https://koreatesol.org/content/korea-tesol-journal-12-1.
  28. Tschirhart, M. (2006). Nonprofit membership associations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 523–541). New Haven: Yale University Press. E-book ISBN: 9780300153439.Google Scholar
  29. Underhill, A. (2006). Closing article: Leadership for TAs reps. In A. Falcão & M. Szesztay (Eds.), Developing an association for language teachers (3rd ed., pp. 63–68). Canterbury, England: IATEFL and the British Council.Google Scholar
  30. Vinopal, K. (2018). Understanding individual and organizational level representation: The case of parental involvement in schools. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (Advance Access, 1–15).  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux036.
  31. Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the female professions. Social Problems, 39(3), 253–267. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3096961.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Keimyung UniversityDaeguSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations