Advertisement

The Impact of a SIG on Assessment Literacy

  • Peter Davidson
  • Christine CoombeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Second Language Learning and Teaching book series (SLLT)

Abstract

A major aim of professional associations is to provide opportunities for professionals to interact with others, share ideas and develop in their chosen profession. Professional associations exist to provide specialized networking and development opportunities to a specific profession, group of individuals or field of study. To promote and support specialized research and communication, smaller subgroups within an association are often chartered or developed. These subgroups are typically known as Special Interest Groups. According to Jacob et al. (2013), association members join SIGs because they want to go deeper into a specialized content area and they enjoy networking with others who ‘speak the same language.’ The TESOL Arabia Testing, Assessment and Evaluation SIG (TAE SIG) has focused their professional development activities on an important trend in the field, that of language assessment literacy (LAL). Language assessment literacy has been a critical topic in English language teaching since the late 1990s. Unfortunately, this is mainly due to the fact that so many English language teachers are not assessment literate. In other words, many English language teachers lack the knowledge and skills to write effective language tests, evaluate the effectiveness of their tests, and use their test results in meaningful ways. The purpose of this chapter is to critically examine the status of LAL in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and report on activities that the TAE SIG has implemented to increase LAL.

References

  1. Boraie, D. (2015). The construct of language assessment literacy as perceived by foreign language teachers in a specific context. Paper presented at the 37th Language Testing and Research Colloquium, Toronto, Canada, 16–20 March 2015.Google Scholar
  2. Cheng, L. (2001). An investigation of ESL/EFL teachers’ classroom assessment practices. Language Testing Update, 29, 53–83.Google Scholar
  3. Coombe, C., & Davidson, P. (2013). Language testing and assessment: International and local research perspectives and priorities. In R. Akbari & C. Coombe (Eds.), Middle East handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 227–244). Dubai, UAE: TESOL Arabia Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Coombe, C., Davidson, P., Gebril, A., Boraie, D., & Hidri, S. (2017). Language assessment in the Middle East and North Africa: Theory, practice and future trends. Dubai: TESOL Arabia.Google Scholar
  5. Coombe, C., Davidson, P., & Lloyd, D. (Eds.). (2009). The fundamentals of language assessment: A practical guide for teachers (2nd ed.). Dubai: TESOL Arabia.Google Scholar
  6. Coombe, C., Davidson, P., O’Sullivan, B., & Stoynoff, S. (Eds.). (2012a). The Cambridge guide to second language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coombe, C., Folse, K., & Hubley, N. (2007). A practical guide to assessing English language learners. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coombe, C., & Khan, R. (2015). Best practice in ELT: Voices from the Classroom. Dubai: TESOL Arabia. (This volume was a collaboration between the TESOL Arabia TAE SIG and the BELTA TEA SIG and featured articles from the Gulf/MENA and Bangladesh).Google Scholar
  9. Coombe, C., Troudi, S., & Al-Hamly, M. (2012). Foreign and second language teacher assessment literacy: Issues, challenges and recommendations. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment (pp. 20–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, P., Coombe, C., & Jones, W. (Eds.). (2005). Assessment in the Arab World. Dubai: TESOL Arabia.Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, P., & Mandalios, J. (2009). Assessment for learning. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, & D. Lloyd (Eds.), The fundamentals of language assessment: A practical guide for teachers (2nd ed., pp. 47–52). Dubai: TESOL Arabia.Google Scholar
  12. England, L. (2018). Communities of practice. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (1st ed.). Project Editor: Margo DelliCarpini; Hoboken, USA: Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0396.
  13. Fan, Y. C., Wang, T. H., & Wang, K. H. (2011). A Web-based model for developing assessment literacy of secondary in-service teachers. Computers & Education, 57, 1727–1740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, A. (2017). Learning-oriented language test preparation materials: A contradiction in terms? Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 112–132.Google Scholar
  16. Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  17. Hamp-Lyons, L. (2017). Language assessment literacy for language learning-oriented assessment. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 88–111.Google Scholar
  18. Harding, L., & Kremmel, B. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy and professional development. In D. Tsagari, & J. Banerjee (Eds.), Handbook of second language assessment (pp. 413–428). Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Hidri, S., & Coombe, C. (forthcoming). Measuring the assessment literacy of teachers in the MENA.Google Scholar
  20. Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25(3), 385–402.Google Scholar
  21. Jacob, W. J., Shiflett, H., Gaulee, U., de Klaver, L., Lee, C.-W., Kamolpun, S., … Rattananuntapat, M. (2013). Perceptions of the role and effectiveness of special interest groups within a professional organization. Professional Development in Education, 39(1), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lloyd, D., Davidson, P., & Coombe, C. (Eds.). (2005). The fundamentals of language assessment: A practical guide for teachers in the Gulf. Dubai: TESOL Arabia.Google Scholar
  24. Magno, C. (2013). Standards for teacher competence on student assessment in the Philippines. The Assessment Handbook, 10, 42–53.Google Scholar
  25. Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. S. (2005). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the Assessment Literacy Inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. National Institute of Education (2010). Teacher Education Model for the 21st Century (TE21). Singapore: NIE. Retrieved on 4/6/17, from https://www.nie.edu.sg/docs/default-source/te21_docs/te21_executive-summary_14052010---updated.pdf?sfvrsn=2.
  27. O’Loughlin, K. (2013). Developing the assessment literacy of university proficiency test users. Language Testing, 30(3), 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Paterno, J. (2001). Measuring success: A glossary of assessment terms. In Building Cathedrals: Compassion for the 21st century. Retrieved July 24, 2003 from http://www.angelfire.com/wa2/buildingcathedrals/measuringsuccess.html.
  29. Stiggins, R. J. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappa, 77(3), 238–245.Google Scholar
  30. Tsagari, D., & Vogt, K. (2017). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers around Europe: Research, challenges and future prospects. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 41–63.Google Scholar
  31. Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). University English teacher assessment literacy: A survey-test report from China. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 133–158.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zayed UniversityDubaiUAE
  2. 2.Dubai Men’s CollegeDubaiUAE

Personalised recommendations