Skip to main content

Impact of the Trump Administration on the Economies of the Greater China Region

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

The new economic policies initiated by the 45th US president Donald Trump, and their impact on the economies of the “the Greater China Region” (Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China) are examined in this chapter. The impact is assessed at both the stock exchange and other non-financial markets levels. For the stock markets, the chosen research period runs from January 2014 to June 2017, and the Economic Policy Uncertainty Index in the United States is used as a proxy to measure political uncertainty in the main world economy. The results show that the stock markets in the “Greater China Region” did not react to the uncertainty generated by the US election in November 2016, but an examination of the move towards assertive trade US protectionist policies suggest a more detrimental impact on the GCR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is all connected with the very issue of “market economy status” that has been denied to China by both the USA and the EU in the Spring of 2017.

  2. 2.

    The Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) with the EU was suspended by the US Administration in the end of 2017 and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was finally signed in March 2018 without the USA .

  3. 3.

    Macau is not included as part of this study, because it does not have a stock market.

  4. 4.

    The import content of exports is defined by the OECD (2018) as the share of imported inputs in the overall exports of a country. This statistical indicator measures therefore the foreign VA share of gross exports.

  5. 5.

    Note that when China joined the WTO in 2001, it accepted to be treated as a non-market economy in anti-dumping procedures until 2016; this implied that its prices and costs were assumed to be artificially set and were therefore not used by the investigating authority in alleged cases of dumping. The reference prices used were instead those of an analogue country (Japan or the USA ) where prices are much higher. When its status came up for debate at WTO level in 2016, both the EU and USA denied China its much after-sought market economy status (MES). The EU’s refusal is based on, inter alia, the degree of government influence over the allocation of resources .

  6. 6.

    See for example the position of German industrialists on this issue in BDI (2017).

  7. 7.

    For more on this, the interested reader can refer to our recent empirical work (see Morales and Andreosso-O’Callaghan 2018).

  8. 8.

    See the evidence contained in the annual reports by the EU Chamber of Commerce in China (for example 2011/2012).

  9. 9.

    Defined at the 8-digit level of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), the list comprises products such as machines-tools (including those used in the textile industry); selected chemicals and pharmaceuticals products; iron, steel and alumina products; precision instruments and instrument engineering; telecommunications equipment; motor vehicles; and other products such as weapons (see USTR 2018).

  10. 10.

    North America Free Trade Agreement signed in August 1992 and in force since 1994.

References

  • Akyiiz, Y. (2011). Export Dependence and Sustainability of Growth in China. China & World Economy, 19(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B., & Uprasen, U. (2009, October 16–18). Measuring the Impact of Protectionism on China: A CGE Approach. ACCS 51st Conference (American Association for Chinese Studies). Winter Park, FL: Rollins College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonakakis, N., Chatziantoniou, I., & Filis, G. (2013). Dynamic Co-movement of Stock Market Returns, Implied Volatility and Policy Uncertainty. Economic Letters, 120(1), 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arouri, M., Estay, C., Rault, C., & Roubaud, D. (2016). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Markets: Long-Run Evidence from the US. Finance Research Letters, 18, 136–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas. (2017). OEC China. Accessed 28 Sept 2018 at https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/profile/country/chn/.

  • Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2012). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty (Working Paper Series). Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131, 1593–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benacek, V., Lenihan, H., Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B., Michalikova, E., & Kan, D. (2014). Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment: How Do They Relate in Various European Countries? The World Economy, 37(5), 625–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bin, L. (2015). Political Leadership Events and Stock Market Reactions: Evidence from the Greater China Region. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 15(8), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • BDI. (2017, December 12). Screening FDI? Position on the Proposed EU Regulation Establishing a Framework for the Screening of FDIs into the EU. Federation of German Industries Position Paper, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N. (2009). The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, T. L. (1981). Political Risk Assessment for Foreign Direct Investment Decisions: Better Methods for Better Results. Columbia Journal of World Business, 16(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogaard, J., & Detzel, A. (2015). The Asset-Pricing Implications of Government Economic Policy Uncertainty. Managment Science, 61, 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, G. M., Sova, A., & Sova, R. (2015). Trade Flows and Trade Specialisation: The Case of China. China Economic Review, 34(July), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Y., & Wei, J. (1996). Political Risk and Stock Price Volatility: The Case of Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 4(2), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, P. C. Y. (2018). Taiwan’s Industrialisation Policy in the Era of Globalization from Sector Specific to Macro-Management. In C. Storm (Ed.), Connecting Taiwan, Participation, Integration, Impacts (pp. 99–124). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1997). Valuing Political Risk. Journal of International Money and Finance, 16, 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5606(97)00008-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., & Tunaru, R. (2003). Quantification of Political Risk with Multiple Dependent Sources. Journal of Economics and Finance, 27(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02827214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E., & Tunaru, T. (2005). The Evolution of International Political Risk 1956–2001. Accessed 15 Apr 2011 at http://repec.org/mmfc05/paper37.pdf.

  • Cui, L., Shu, C., & Su, X. (2009). How Much Do Exports Matter for China’s Growth? China Economic Issues, Number 1/09. Hong Kong Monetary Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deraniyagala, S., & Fine, B. (2001). New Trade Theory Versus Old Trade Policy: A Continuing Enigma. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25(6), 809–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopke, J., & Pierdzioch, C. (2006). Politics and the Stock Market: Evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Economy, 22(4), 925–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU Chamber of Commerce in China. (2011/2012). European Business in China Position Paper, Shanghai.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2016, December). China’s WTO Accession: 15 Years on—Taking, Shaking or Shaping WTO Rules? Luxembourg: EP Briefing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabre, G. (2013, October). The Lion’s Share: What’s Behind China’s Economic Slowdown. Paris: Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong, W. M., & Koh, S. K. (2002). The Political Economy of Volatility Dynamics in the Hong Kong Market. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 9(3–4), 259–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrerias, M. J., & Orts, V. (2010). Is the Export-Led Growth Hypothesis Enough to Account for China’s Growth. China & World Economy, 18(4), 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, W., & Ratti, R. A. (2015). Oil Shocks, Policy Uncertainty, and Stock Returns in China. Economics of Transition, 23, 657–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, R., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2008). How Much of Chinese Exports Is Really Made in China? Assessing Foreign and Domestic Value-Added in Gross Exports (Office of Economics Working Paper No. 2008-03-B). U.S. International Trade Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, D., & Malhotra, N. (2014). Trade-Led Growth in India and China: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies, 7(2), 68–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L., Willett, T. D., & Zhang, N. (2012). The Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on China’s Financial Market and Macroeconomy. Economics Research International Volume 2012. Article ID 961694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X. M., & Peng, L. (2017). US Economic Policy Uncertainty and Co-movements Between Chinese and US Stock Markets. Economic Modelling, 61, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Zhongwen, C., & Changjian, S. (2010). Research on the Relationship Between Foreign Trade and the GDP Growth of East China—Empirical Analysis Based on Causality. Modern Economy, 1, 118–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., & Zhang, T. (2015). Economic Policy Uncertainty and Stock Market Volatility. Finance Research Letters, 15, 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovely, M. E., & Liang, Y. (2018, May). Trump Tariffs Primarily Hit Multinational Supply Chains, Harm US Technology Competitiveness. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales & Andreosso-O’Callaghan. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities Brought to the Chinese Economy by BREXIT and the New US Administration. Paper presented at the 2017 Paris Financial Management Conference, 18–20 December 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). OECD Data—Import Content of Exports. Accessed 28 Sept 2018 at https://data.oecd.org/trade/importcontent-of-exports.htm.

  • Prasad, E. S. (2010, February 25). The U.S.-China Economic Relationship: Shifts and Twists in the Balance of Power. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on “U.S. Debt to China: Implications and Repercussions.” The Brookings Institution, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, F. (1973). Analysing Political Risks in International Business. In A. Kapoor & P. D. Grub (Eds.), Multinational Enterprise in Transition. Princeton: The Darwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosier, K., O’Connor, S., & Cuevas, R. (2016). Taiwan’s Economy Amid Political Transition (Staff Research Report). U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Available at https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/Taiwan%27s%20Economy%20amid%20Political%20Transition.pdf.

  • Simon, J. D. (1982). Political Risk Assessment: Past Trends and Future Prospects. Columbia Journal of World Business, 17(3), 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suleman, M. T. (2012). Stock Market Reactions to Good and Bad Political News. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(1), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, O. G., & Gannon, G. L. (2002). Information Effect of Economic News: SPI Futures. International Review of Financial Analysis, 11, 467–489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1057-5219(02)00065-0. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-10/trump-and-china-us-election-analysis/8011828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, H. (2017). How to Manage Geopolitical Instability in East Asia. East Asia Insights—Toward Community Building. Japan Center for International Exchange. Available at http://www.jcie.or.jp/insights/11-4.pdf.

  • Tingvall, P. G., & Ljungwall, C. (2012). Is China Different? A Meta-analysis of Export-Led Growth. Economics Letters, 115, 177–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USTR. (2018). Notice of Determination and Request for Public Comment Concerning Proposed Determination of Action Pursuant to Section 301: China’s Acts, Policies, and Practices Related to Technology Transfer, Intellectual Property, and Innovation (Docket No. USTR-2018-0005). Washington: Office of the US Trade Representative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2007). The Evolution of China’s International Trade Policy: Development Through Protection and Liberalization. Economic Development Through World Trade, 191–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2016, April). World Development Indicators Database. Accessed July 2017 at https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=CN.

  • World Investment Report. (2017). Investment and the Digital Economy. Geneva: UNCTAD, United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO. (2017). Trade Statistics—World Trade Statistical Review 2016. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yueh, L. (2013). China’s Growth: The Making of an Economic Superpower. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B., Morales, L. (2018). Impact of the Trump Administration on the Economies of the Greater China Region. In: Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B., Jaussaud, J., Zolin, M. (eds) Asian Nations and Multinationals. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00913-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00913-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00912-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00913-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics