Abstract
This chapter concludes that the Open Method of Coordination, which constitutes the policy ontology of the Bologna Process, institutes the new mode of soft governance in which all agents become standardizers themselves. The bench is not marked from the outside. All the actors involved in the Bologna Process mark the bench. The benchmarking is part of a material-affective economy in which affects such as fear and desire are capitalized, borrowed and exchanged – an economy that marks the bench in the sense of setting the standards by circulating them. Meanwhile, the chapter also suggests that governing through calculative practices such as standardization and auditing may not necessarily lead to an increased manageability of the agents involved. Standardization is a term that suggests a standardizing process has taken place, but the chapter concludes that this does not necessarily mean that the process has contributed uniformity. Many of the effects of the new standards prove to be unintended and disguised, yet the effects are omnipresent such as for example the transformations of everyday working life. The challenge is that no one person or organization is in control of the infrastructure that circulates the standards. And, to the extent that we live our working life in higher education through this infrastructure – in, on, and around it – we help sustain its power and effects. In this way the new standards have become regulators themselves – the faceless masters of higher education – even though they often enter higher education undetected as governance.
Concluding Remarks: “Who Marks the Bench?” (Pasias & Roussakis, 2012)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268.
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (2000). Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brøgger, K. (2016). Du skal ville det, du skal. Om de videregående uddannelsers nye tilskyndelsesøkonomi. Dansk Pædagogisk Tidsskrift (Danish Journal of Education), 2, 87–99.
Brøgger, K., & Karseth, B. (2020, forthcoming). Federalization of quality assurance in higher education? Taking stock on account of the 20th anniversary of the Bologna Process: An examination of federalization through accreditation procedures. Studies in Higher Education.
Brunsson, N. (2000). Standardization and uniformity. In N. Brunsson & B. Jacobsson (Eds.), A world of standards. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Brunsson, N., & Jacobsson, B. (2000). A world of standards. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Derrida, J. (1972). Marges de la Philosophie. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
Derrida, J. (2002). Differance. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Det Lille Forlag.
Drori, G. S., Meyer, J. W., & Hwang, H. (2006). Globalization and organization. World society and organizational change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
EHEA-ministers. (2007). Strategy for the EHEA in a global setting. Adopted by ministers in 2007.
Haraway, D. (1992). The promises of monsters: A regenerative politics for Inappropiate/d others. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural studies. New York/London: Routledge.
Higgins, V., & Larner, W. (2010). In V. Higgins & W. Larner (Eds.), Calculating the social. Standards and the reconfiguration of governing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Higgins, W., & Tamm Hallström, K. (2007). Standardization, globalization and rationalities of government. Organization, 14(5), 685–704.
Karseth, B., & Solbrekke, T. D. (2010). Qualifications frameworks: The avenue towards the convergence of European higher education? European Journal of Edcuation, 45(4), 563–576.
Keeling, R. (2004). Locating ourselves in the ‘European higher education area’: Investigating the Bologna Process in practice. Retrieved from ECPR, European Political Science Network. www.epsnet.org
Lampland, M., & Star, S. L. (2009). In M. Lampland & S. L. Star (Eds.), Standards and their stories. How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Law, J. (2003). Making a mess with method. Published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Online-paper.
Law, J. (2004). After method. Mess in social science research. London/New York: Routledge.
Mennicken, A. (2008). Connecting worlds: The translation of international auditing standards into post-Soviet audit practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 384–414.
Nielsen, P. (1993). Romanen som monster. Om det monstrøses æstetik hos Robert Musil. Passages, 8(13), 75–93.
Pasias, G., & Roussakis, Y. (2012). “Who marks the bench?” A critical review of the neo-European “paradigm shift” through higher education policies and discourses. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 10(1), 127–141.
Robertson, S., Dale, R., Moutsios, S., Nielsen, G. B., Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2012). Globalisation and regionalisation in higher education: Toward a new conceptual framework. (Summative working paper for work package 1, URGE, Working Paper 20, pp 1–69).
Rose, N. (1988). Calculable minds and manageable individuals. History of the Human Sciences, 1(2), 179–200.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2012). Understanding policy borrowing and lending. Building comparative policy studies. In G. Steiner-Khamsi & F. Waldow (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2012. Policy borrowing and lending in education. New York: Routledge.
Strathern, M. (2000). Audit cultures. Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics and the academy. London/New York: Routledge.
Tamm Hallström, K. (2004). Organizing international standardization. Iso and the IASC in quest of authority. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010). A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization. The Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 69–89.
White, S. K. (2000). Sustaining affirmation. The strengths of weak ontology in political theory. Princeton, NJ/Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brøgger, K. (2019). Concluding Remarks: “Who Marks the Bench?”. In: Governing through Standards: the Faceless Masters of Higher Education. Educational Governance Research, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00886-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00886-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00885-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00886-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)