Abstract
Civil War photographers visited the battlefield south of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, in the days immediately after fighting had ceased and captured some of the most important images of combat fatalities ever produced. These iconic photographs were shocking to citizens on the home front, and at the same time, they proved immensely popular. To historians, the photographs document the nature of the landscape as well as the dress and physical condition of the soldiers. Unfortunately, the photographers often provided erroneous, vague, or even fraudulent captions and descriptions for their images, much to the confusion of postbellum historians. A century after these photographs were published, local historian William Frassanito used the geomorphology of the battleground, and specifically the unusual mechanical and chemical weathering patterns, systematic joints, and exfoliation forms of the outcropping diabase, to identify the location of many of these photographs. This combination of forensic analysis and geological study also allowed Frassanito to prove that the image many scholars consider the most famous photograph to emerge from the Civil War—Alexander Gardner’s “Rocks could not save him at the Battle of Gettysburg”—was, in reality, staged and the dramatically-positioned cadaver had been transported by the photographer and his assistants across Devil’s Den to a more photogenic location.
“Rocks could not save him at the Battle of Gettysburg”
—Alexander Gardner’s title for his photograph of a dead Confederate “sharpshooter” in Devil’s Den
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
More than one of Gardner’s photographs was titled “A Harvest of Death”. This is the most famous.
References
Adelman, G. E., & Smith, T. H. (1997). Devil’s den: A history and guide (160p). Gettysburg, PA: Thomas Publications.
Brown, A. (1962). Geology and the Gettysburg Campaign, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Educational Series n. 5, 15p.
Doyle, P. (2006). Military geology and the Battle of Gettysburg, July 1863. Geology Today, 22 (4), 142–149.
Dunning, G. R., & Hodych, J. P. (1990). U/Pb zircon and baddeleyite ages for the palisades and Gettysburg sills of the northeastern United States: Implications for the age of the Triassic/Jurassic boundary. Geology, 18, 795–798.
Frassanito, W. A. (1975). Gettysburg: A journey in time. (248p). New York: Scribner.
Frassanito, W. A. (1978). Antietam: The photographic legacy of America’s Bloodiest Day (304p). New York: Scribner.
Frassanito, W. A. (1983). Grant and Lee: The Virginia Campaigns, 1864–1865 (442p). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Frassanito, W. A. (1995). Early photography at Gettysburg (448p). Gettysburg, PA: Thomas Publications.
Hippensteel, S. P. (2016). Carbonate rocks and American Civil War infantry tactics. Geosphere, Themed Issue: Human Dimensions in Geoscience, 12, 354–365.
Inners, J. D., & Fleeger, G. M. (2008). Stop 9- little round top: Day 2 action and the York haven diabase. In G. M. Fleeger (Ed.), Geology of the Gettysburg Mesozoic Basin and Military Geology of the Gettysburg Campaign, 73rd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Gettysburg, PA (pp. 133–141).
Inners, J. D., & Smith, R. C. (2008). Stop 10- Devil’s Den: Day 2 action and the York haven diabase. In G. M. Fleeger (Ed.), Geology of the Gettysburg Mesozoic Basin and Military Geology of the Gettysburg Campaign, 73rd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Gettysburg, PA (pp. 142–148).
Inners, J. D., Cuffey, R. J., Smith, R. C., II, Neubaum, J. C., Keen, R. C., Fleeger, G. M., Butts, L., Delano, H. L., Neubaum, V. A., & Howe, R. H. (2004). Rifts, diabase, and the topographic ‘Fishhook’: Terrain and military geology of the Battle of Gettysburg – July 1–3, 1863. Pre-Meeting Field Trip 4, Guidebook (105p). Geological Society of America Northeast/Southeast Sections.
Inners, J. D., Cuffey, R. J., Smith, R. C., II, Neubaum, J. C., Keen, R. C., Fleeger, G. M., Butts, L., Delano, H. L., Neubaum, V. A., & Howe, R. H. (2006). Rifts, diabase, and the topographic “fishhook”—Terrain and military geology of the Battle of Gettysburg – July 1–3, 1863 (111p). Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 4th series, Open-File Report 06-02.
Smith, R. C., II, & Keen, R. C. (2004). Regional rifts and the Battle of Gettysburg. Pennsylvania Geology, 34(3), 2–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hippensteel, S. (2019). Geomorphology and Civil War Combat Photography. In: Rocks and Rifles. Advances in Military Geosciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00877-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00877-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00876-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00877-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)