Skip to main content

Geomorphology and Civil War Combat Photography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rocks and Rifles

Part of the book series: Advances in Military Geosciences ((AMG))

  • 446 Accesses

Abstract

Civil War photographers visited the battlefield south of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, in the days immediately after fighting had ceased and captured some of the most important images of combat fatalities ever produced. These iconic photographs were shocking to citizens on the home front, and at the same time, they proved immensely popular. To historians, the photographs document the nature of the landscape as well as the dress and physical condition of the soldiers. Unfortunately, the photographers often provided erroneous, vague, or even fraudulent captions and descriptions for their images, much to the confusion of postbellum historians. A century after these photographs were published, local historian William Frassanito used the geomorphology of the battleground, and specifically the unusual mechanical and chemical weathering patterns, systematic joints, and exfoliation forms of the outcropping diabase, to identify the location of many of these photographs. This combination of forensic analysis and geological study also allowed Frassanito to prove that the image many scholars consider the most famous photograph to emerge from the Civil War—Alexander Gardner’s “Rocks could not save him at the Battle of Gettysburg”—was, in reality, staged and the dramatically-positioned cadaver had been transported by the photographer and his assistants across Devil’s Den to a more photogenic location.

“Rocks could not save him at the Battle of Gettysburg”

—Alexander Gardner’s title for his photograph of a dead Confederate “sharpshooter” in Devil’s Den

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    More than one of Gardner’s photographs was titled “A Harvest of Death”. This is the most famous.

References

  • Adelman, G. E., & Smith, T. H. (1997). Devil’s den: A history and guide (160p). Gettysburg, PA: Thomas Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (1962). Geology and the Gettysburg Campaign, Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Educational Series n. 5, 15p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, P. (2006). Military geology and the Battle of Gettysburg, July 1863. Geology Today, 22 (4), 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, G. R., & Hodych, J. P. (1990). U/Pb zircon and baddeleyite ages for the palisades and Gettysburg sills of the northeastern United States: Implications for the age of the Triassic/Jurassic boundary. Geology, 18, 795–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frassanito, W. A. (1975). Gettysburg: A journey in time. (248p). New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frassanito, W. A. (1978). Antietam: The photographic legacy of America’s Bloodiest Day (304p). New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frassanito, W. A. (1983). Grant and Lee: The Virginia Campaigns, 1864–1865 (442p). New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frassanito, W. A. (1995). Early photography at Gettysburg (448p). Gettysburg, PA: Thomas Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hippensteel, S. P. (2016). Carbonate rocks and American Civil War infantry tactics. Geosphere, Themed Issue: Human Dimensions in Geoscience, 12, 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inners, J. D., & Fleeger, G. M. (2008). Stop 9- little round top: Day 2 action and the York haven diabase. In G. M. Fleeger (Ed.), Geology of the Gettysburg Mesozoic Basin and Military Geology of the Gettysburg Campaign, 73rd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Gettysburg, PA (pp. 133–141).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inners, J. D., & Smith, R. C. (2008). Stop 10- Devil’s Den: Day 2 action and the York haven diabase. In G. M. Fleeger (Ed.), Geology of the Gettysburg Mesozoic Basin and Military Geology of the Gettysburg Campaign, 73rd Annual Field Conference of Pennsylvania Geologists, Gettysburg, PA (pp. 142–148).

    Google Scholar 

  • Inners, J. D., Cuffey, R. J., Smith, R. C., II, Neubaum, J. C., Keen, R. C., Fleeger, G. M., Butts, L., Delano, H. L., Neubaum, V. A., & Howe, R. H. (2004). Rifts, diabase, and the topographic ‘Fishhook’: Terrain and military geology of the Battle of Gettysburg – July 1–3, 1863. Pre-Meeting Field Trip 4, Guidebook (105p). Geological Society of America Northeast/Southeast Sections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inners, J. D., Cuffey, R. J., Smith, R. C., II, Neubaum, J. C., Keen, R. C., Fleeger, G. M., Butts, L., Delano, H. L., Neubaum, V. A., & Howe, R. H. (2006). Rifts, diabase, and the topographic “fishhook”—Terrain and military geology of the Battle of Gettysburg – July 1–3, 1863 (111p). Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 4th series, Open-File Report 06-02.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. C., II, & Keen, R. C. (2004). Regional rifts and the Battle of Gettysburg. Pennsylvania Geology, 34(3), 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hippensteel, S. (2019). Geomorphology and Civil War Combat Photography. In: Rocks and Rifles. Advances in Military Geosciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00877-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics