Skip to main content

Annotated Corpus of Czech Case Law for Reference Recognition Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Text, Speech, and Dialogue (TSD 2018)

Abstract

We describe an annotated corpus of 350 decisions of Czech top-tier courts which was gathered for a project assessing the relevance of court decisions in Czech law. We describe two layers of processing of the corpus; every decision was annotated by two trained annotators and then manually adjudicated by one trained curator to solve possible disagreements between annotators. This corpus was developed as training and testing material for reference recognition tasks which will be further used for research on assessment of legal importance. However, the overall shortage of available research corpora of annotated legal texts, particularly in Czech language, leads us to believe that other research teams may find it useful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., Tablan, V.: GATE: an architecture for development of Robust HLT applications. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual ACL meeting, pp. 168–175 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davies, M.: Corpus of US Supreme Court Opinions. https://corpus.byu.edu/scotus/

  3. Dozier, C., Kondadadi, R., Light, M., Vachher, A., Veeramachaneni, S., Wudali, R.: Named entity recognition and resolution in legal text. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6036, pp. 27–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12837-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Grover, C., Hachey, B., Hughson, I.: The HOLJ corpus: supporting summarisation of legal texts. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Linguistically Interpreted Corpora, pp. 47–53 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harašta, J., Šavelka, J.: Toward linking heterogenous references in Czech court decisions to content. In: Proceedings of JURIX, pp. 177–182 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hamann, H., Vogel, F., Gauer, I.: Computer assisted legal linguistics (CAL\(^{2}\)). In: Proceedings of JURIX, pp. 195–198 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Höfler, S., Piotrowski, M.: Building corpora for the philological study of Swiss legal texts. J. Lang. Technol. Comput. Linguist. 26(2), 77–89 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kríž, V., Hladká, B., Dědek, J., Nečaský, M.: Statistical recognition of references in Czech court decisions. In: Gelbukh, A., Espinoza, F.C., Galicia-Haro, S.N. (eds.) MICAI 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8856, pp. 51–61. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13647-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Landthaler, J., Waltl, B., Matthes, F.: Unveiling references in legal texts: implicit versus explicit network structures. In: Proceedings of IRIS, pp. 71–78 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, J.S., Chen, H.-H., Ho, M.H.-C., Li, Y.-C.: Citations with different levels of relevancy: tracing the main paths of legal opinions. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 65(12), 2479–2488 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. de Maat, E., Winkels, R., Van Engers, T.: Automated detection of reference structures in law. In: Proceedings of JURIX, pp. 41–50 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. van Opijnen, M.: Canonicalizing complex case law citations. In: Proceedings of JURIX, pp. 97–106 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Palmirani, M., Brighi, R., Massini, M.: Automated extraction of normative references in legal texts. In: Proceedings of ICAIL, pp. 105–106 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peréz, J.M., Rizzo, C.R.: Structure and design of the british law report corpus (BLRC): a legal corpus of judicial decisions from the UK. J. Engl. Stud. 10, 131–145 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Panagis, Y., Šadl, U.: The force of EU case law: a multidimensional study of case citations. In: Proceedings of JURIX, pp. 71–80 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Automated System and Method for Generating Reasons that a Court Case is Cited. Patent US6856988

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pontrandolfo, G.: Investigating judicial phraseology with COSPE: a contrastive corpus-based study. In: Fantinuoli, C., Zanettin, F. (eds.) New Directions in Corpus-Based Translation Studies, pp. 137–159 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rodríguez-Puente, P.: Introducing the corpus of historical english law reports: structure and compilation techniques. Revistas de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17, 99–120 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Steinberger, R. et al.: The JRC-Acquis: a multilingual aligned parallel corpus with 20+ languages. In: Proceedings of LREC, pp. 2142–2147 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vogel, F., Hamann, H., Gauer, I.: Computer-assisted legal linguistics: corpus analysis as a new tool for legal studies. In: Law & Social Inquiry, Early View (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walker, V.R.: The need for annotated corpora from legal documents, and for (Human) protocols for creating them: the attribution problem. In: Cabrio, E., Graeme, H., Villata, S., Wyner, A. (eds.) Natural Language Argumentation: Mining, Processing, and Reasoning over Textual Arguments (Dagstuhl Seminar 16161) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wyner, A.Z., Peters, W., Katz, D.: A case study on legal case annotations. In: Proceedings of JURIX, pp. 165–174 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wyner, A.: Towards annotating and extracting textual legal case elements. Informatica e diritto XIX(1–2), 173–183 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, P., Koppaka, L.: Semantics-based legal citation network. In: Proceedings of ICAIL, pp. 123–130 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Contribution Statement and Acknowledgment

J.H. developed the annotation scheme, prepared the annotation manual, and selected the court decisions included in the dataset. J.H., T.Š., N.Š., and J.Z. participated in dummy runs and evaluation of annotation manual. J.H., F.K., A.K., P.L., J.M., D.P., H.P., P.S., T.Š., N.Š., M.V., L.Z., and J.Z. annotated the decisions. J.H., P.L., and J.M. curated/edited the decisions. J.Š. programmed the annotation environment, prepared dataset for publication, and prepared dataset statistics. J.H., J.Š., F.K. wrote the paper with input from all authors.

J.H., F.K., A.K., P.L., J.M., D.P., H.P., P.S., T.Š., M.V., L.Z., and J.Z. gratefully acknowledge the support from the Czech Science Foundation under grant no. GA17-20645S.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jakub Harašta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Harašta, J. et al. (2018). Annotated Corpus of Czech Case Law for Reference Recognition Tasks. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds) Text, Speech, and Dialogue. TSD 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00794-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00794-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00793-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00794-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics