Skip to main content

Put to the Test: Canguilhem’s Biological Philosophy and a New Concept of Error

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Georges Canguilhem and the Problem of Error
  • 229 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter draws together preceding conclusions to show the central significance of error for Canguilhem’s biological philosophy. Examining an unpublished 1955–1956 lecture course clarifies how it addressed error as a philosophical and social-political problem by studying the history of biological sciences. Because this philosophy depends on his understanding of technical and artistic creation, I exemplify this before examining imagination’s role in human life as a vital response to monstrous alteration that makes both artistic and scientific activity possible. Yet in banishing monsters as imaginary, positivist science becomes monstrous itself. There is no escaping such alterations. I conclude, therefore, by considering his biological philosophy’s spirit and ability to endure the alteration that threatened it when Canguilhem finally recognized error as a scientific concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Canguilhem (1951, 413).

  2. 2.

    For a different presentation of this course in relation to Foucaultian biopower, see Talcott (2014).

  3. 3.

    It could be worth investigating whether Canguilhem’s students address these formulations in their own writings.

  4. 4.

    His ideas about contrariety call for elucidation via Eugène Dupréel’s philosophy of values.

  5. 5.

    Foucault’s archeologies might be read as pushing Canguilhem further on this point.

  6. 6.

    De Le Motte’s 1676 painting appears to nearly copy of Cornelius Gijsbrechts’ Trompe-l’oeil with Studio Wall and Vanitas Still Life, 1668, oil on canvas, Copenhagen, Statens Museum for Kunst, inv. KMS st 537.

  7. 7.

    Canguilhem alludes to contemporary discussions of cybernetics. Further investigation of this must await a more developed investigation of his later writings.

  8. 8.

    Further discussion awaits an in-depth examination of his contemporaneous and later writings.

References

  • Canguilhem, Georges. 1951. “Interview with Michel Tournier.” Radiodiffusion française, série “Connaissance de l’homme,” émission diffusée le 5 septembre; Published in Canguilhem 2015 as “Le mythe de la jeunesse,” 405–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1952. “Réflexions sur la création artistique selon Alain.” Revue de métaphysique et de morale 57 (2) (avril–juin): 171–186; Reprinted in Canguilhem 2015, 415–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1955–1956. Course Notes, “La Science et l’Erreur.” Fonds Georges Canguilhem, Centre d’Archives de Philosophie, d’Histoire et d’Édition des Sciences—UMS 2267.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1956. “Expérience et aventure.” Rivages. Óragão dos Alunos do Curso Liceal do Lycée Français Charles Lepierre, octobre 1956, pp. 1, 17; Reprinted in Canguilhem 2015, 673–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. “La constitution de la physiologie comme science.” In Physiologie, Tome 1, edited by Charles Kayser. Paris: Flammarion; Reprinted in Canguilhem [1968] 2002, 226–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1965] 2008. Knowledge of Life. Translated by Stefanos Geroulanos and Daniela Ginsburg. New York: Fordham University Press; [1952] 1965. Connaissance de la vie. 2nd ed. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1966] 1989. The Normal and the Pathological. Translated by C. R. Fawcett. Brooklyn: Zone Books; [1943] 1966. Le normal et le pathologique. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. [1968] 2002. Études d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Oeuvres complètes. Tome 4. Edited by C. Limoges. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Katharine Park. 1998. Wonders and the Order of Nature: 1150–1750. Brooklyn: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talcott, Samuel. 2014. “Errant Life, Molecular Biology, and the Conceptualization of Biopower: Georges Canguilhem, François Jacob, and Michel Foucault.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (2): 254–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Talcott .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Talcott, S. (2019). Put to the Test: Canguilhem’s Biological Philosophy and a New Concept of Error. In: Georges Canguilhem and the Problem of Error. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00779-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics