Skip to main content

Spotlighting Use Case Specific Architectures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Architecture (ECSA 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11048))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Most of the time a large software system implies a complex architecture. However, at some point of the system’s execution, its components are not necessarily all running. Indeed, some components may not be concerned by a given use case, and therefore they do not consume/use or register the declared services. Thus, these architectural elements (components and their services) represent a “noise” in the architecture model of the system. Their elimination from the architecture model may greatly reduce its complexity, and consequently helps developers in their maintenance tasks. In our work, we argue that a large service-oriented system has, not only one, but several architectures, which are specific to its runtime use cases. Indeed, each architecture reflects the services, and thereby the components, which are really useful for a given use case. In this paper, we present an approach for recovering such use case specific architectures of service-oriented systems. Architectures are recovered both through a source code analysis and by querying the runtime environment and the service registry. The first built architecture (the core architecture) is composed of the components that are present in all the use cases. Then, depending on a particular use case, this core architecture will be enriched with only the needed components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Downloaded from repository: https://lc.cx/P2Qw.

  2. 2.

    SCA is a set of specifications which describe SOA systems: https://lc.cx/AEP3.

  3. 3.

    They have been downloaded from the following repository: https://lc.cx/m77k.

References

  1. Abi-Antoun, M., Aldrich, J.: Static extraction and conformance analysis of hierarchical runtime architectural structure using annotations. In: Proceedings of the ACM OOPSLA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alahmari, S., Zaluska, E., De Roure, D.: A service identification framework for legacy system migration into SOA. In: Proceedings of the IEEE SCC 2010. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allier, S., Sadou, S., Sahraoui, H.A., Fleurquin, R.: From object-oriented applications to component-oriented applications via component- oriented architecture. In: Proceedings of WICSA, Colorado, USA. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allier, S., Sahraoui, H.A., Sadou, S., Vaucher, S.: Restructuring object-oriented applications into component-oriented applications by using consistency with execution traces. In: Grunske, L., Reussner, R., Plasil, F. (eds.) CBSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6092, pp. 216–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13238-4_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chardigny, S., Seriai, A., Oussalah, M., Tamzalit, D.: Extraction of component-based architecture from object-oriented systems. In: Proceedings of WICSA. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colangelo, D., Compare, D., Inverardi, P., Pelliccione, P.: Reducing software architecture models complexity: a slicing and abstraction approach. In: Najm, E., Pradat-Peyre, J.-F., Donzeau-Gouge, V.V. (eds.) FORTE 2006. LNCS, vol. 4229, pp. 243–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11888116_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Demange, A., Moha, N., Tremblay, G.: Detection of SOA patterns. In: Basu, S., Pautasso, C., Zhang, L., Fu, X. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8274, pp. 114–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45005-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ducasse, S., Pollet, D.: Software architecture reconstruction: a process-oriented taxonomy. IEEE TSE 35(4), 573–591 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia, J., Ivkovic, I., Medvidovic, N.: A comparative analysis of software architecture recovery techniques. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM ASE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiao, F., Hu, C., Zhao, C.: A software complexity metric for SCA specification. In: Proceedings of the CSSE. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kerdoudi, M.L., Tibermacine, C., Sadou, S.: Opening web applications for third-party development: a service-oriented solution. J. SOCA 10(4), 437–463 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang, Q.A., Chung, J.Y., Miller, S., Ouyang, Y.: Service pattern discovery of web service mining in web service registry-repository. In: Proceedings of ICEBE 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lutellier, T., Chollak, D., Garcia, J., Tan, L., Rayside, D., Medvidovic, N., Kroeger, R.: Measuring the impact of code dependencies on software architecture recovery techniques. IEEE TSE 44(2), 159–181 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. MacCormack, A., Rusnak, J., Baldwin, C.Y.: Exploring the structure of complex software designs: an empirical study of open source and proprietary code. Manag. Sci. 52(7), 1015–1030 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maqbool, O., Babri, H.: Hierarchical clustering for software architecture recovery. IEEE TSE 33(11), 759–780 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McAffer, J., VanderLei, P., Archer, S.: OSGi and Equinox: Creating Highly Modular Java Systems. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. O’Brien, L., Smith, D., Lewis, G.: Supporting migration to services using software architecture reconstruction. In: Proceedings of STEP. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Razavian, M., Lago, P.: A systematic literature review on SOA migration. J. Softw.: Evol. Process. 27(5), 337–372 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sangal, N., Jordan, E., Sinha, V., Jackson, D.: Using dependency models to manage complex software architecture. In: Proceedings of the ACM OOPSLA. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seriai, A., Sadou, S., Sahraoui, H., Hamza, S.: Deriving component interfaces after a restructuring of a legacy system. In: Proceedings of WICSA. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seriai, A., Sadou, S., Sahraoui, H.A.: Enactment of components extracted from an object-oriented application. In: Avgeriou, P., Zdun, U. (eds.) ECSA 2014. LNCS, vol. 8627, pp. 234–249. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Upadhyaya, B., Tang, R., Zou, Y.: An approach for mining service composition patterns from execution logs. J. Softw.: Evol. Process. 25(8), 841–870 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Lamine Kerdoudi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kerdoudi, M.L., Tibermacine, C., Sadou, S. (2018). Spotlighting Use Case Specific Architectures. In: Cuesta, C., Garlan, D., Pérez, J. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11048. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00761-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00761-4_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00760-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00761-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics