Skip to main content

Evaluating Co-production in Mental Health Services as a Support for Co-design Activities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Service Design and Service Thinking in Healthcare and Hospital Management

Abstract

Most healthcare managers and professionals ignore how to include and take advantage of design thinking methods to improve services and processes. Yet, initial evidence is emerging about the potential of service design, not only to solve service challenges but also to support organisational change. In the field of mental healthcare, the inclusion of service design approaches was lately fostered by the increasing attention on co-production and patient engagement, as well as by the growing interest towards recovery principles and approaches. This chapter presents an action research project conducted by the Departments of Design and Management Engineering of Politecnico di Milano in collaboration with the Department of Mental Health of Spedali Civili di Brescia (Italy). It focuses on how the introduction of an evaluative component into the service design process supported the set-up of co-design activities aimed at triggering an organisational change in the mental health department. The project is described in its main phases, illustrating how an initial evaluative research, consisting of a qualitative field research conducted both from the user and the organisation perspectives, informed the assessment of co-production promising practices and values. Then, it is discussed how this evaluation approach, when integrated within service design as a practice, can help sensitising and amplifying co-production values, therefore favouring the diffusion of co-production within organisations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions: Essay on the division of expert labour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Batalden, M., Batalden, P., Margolis, P., Seid, M., Armstrong, G., Opipari-Arrigan, L., et al. (2016). Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Quality and Safety, 25(7), 509–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bate, P., & Robert, G. (2006). Experience-based design: From redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15(5), 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J. (2011). The enabling role of social position in diverging from the institutional status quo: Evidence from the UK National Health Service. Organization Science, 22(4), 817–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, U. E., Briss, P. A., Goodman, A. R., & Browman, B. A. (2014). Prevention of chronic disease in 21st century: Elimination of the leading preventable causes of premature death and disability in the USA. Lancet, 384(9937), 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomkvist, J. (2011). Conceptualising prototypes in service design. Linköping: Linköping University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen S., Dearden A., Wright P., Wolstenholme D., & Cobb M. (2010). Participatory healthcare service design and innovation. In: Bodker K., Bratteteig T., Loi D., & Robertson T. (Eds.). PDC ‘10 Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (p. 155). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, ACM Press, New York, November 29–December 3, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. London: Nesta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, J., Flatley, M., & Meyer, J. (2010). Older people’s and relatives’ experiences in acute care settings: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(1), 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012). Institutional work to maintain professional power: Recreating the model of medical professionalism. Organization Studies, 33(7), 937–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, M. (1993). Professionalism, educated labour and the state: Hospital medicine and the new managerialism. The Sociological Review, 41(2), 244–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Design Commission. (2013). Restarting Britain 2: Design and public services. Design Commission. Retrieved October 13, 2017, from http://www.policyconnect.org.uk/apdig/sites/site_apdig/files/report/164/fieldreportdownload/designcommissionreport-restartingbritain2-designpublicservices.pdf

  • Design Council. (2012). Design delivers for business: A summary of evidence from the Design Council’s design leadership programme. Design Council. Retrieved August 30, 2017, from http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/DesignDelivers%20for%20Business%20briefing.pdf

  • Design Council. (2013). Design for public good. Design Council. Retrieved September 21, 2017, from http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/Design%20for%20Public%20Good.pdf

  • Donetto, S., Pierri, P., Tsianakas, V., & Robert, G. (2015). Experience-based co-design and healthcare improvement: Realizing participatory design in the public sector. The Design Journal, 18(2), 227–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donetto, S., Tsianakas, V., & Robert, G. (2014). Using experience-based co-design to improve the quality of healthcare: Mapping where we are now and establishing future directions. London: King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, C., Lennox, L., & Bell, D. (2013). A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open, 3(1), e001570. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-0.001570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drupsteen, J., van der Vaart, T., & Pieter van Donk, D. (2013). Integrative practices in hospitals and their impact on patient flow. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 33(7), 912–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durose C., Mangan C., Needham C., & Rees J. (2014). Evaluating co-production: Pragmatic approaches to building the evidence base. Political Studies Association. Retrieved January 3, 2018, from https://www.psa.ac.uk/sites/default/files/conference/papers/2014/Evidencing%20Coproduction%20PSA%20paper,%20final.pdf

  • Epstein, R. M., & Street, R. L. (2011). The values and value of patient-centered care. Annals of Family Medicine, 9(2), 100–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020 flagship initiative innovation union. European Commission. Retrieved December 18, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/innovation-union-communication_en.pdf

  • Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., Wood, M., & Hawkins, C. (2005). The nonspread of innovations: The mediating role of professionals. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foglieni, F., Villari, B., & Maffei, S. (2017). Designing better services: A strategic approach from design to evaluation. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (1986). Professional powers: A study of the institutionalization of formal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, B. G., Tirupati, S., Johnston, S., Turrell, M., Lewin, T. J., Sly, K. A., et al. (2017). An integrated recovery-oriented model (IRM) for mental health services: Evolution and challenges. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaimo, S. (2002). Markets and medicine: The politics of health care reform in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Ann Arbour: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2013). Design for care. Brooklyn: Rosenfeld Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, S., Kenny, A., & McKinstry, C. (2015). The meaning of recovery in a regional mental health service: An action research study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(1), 181–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Boutillier, C., Chevalier, A., Lawrence, V., Leamy, M., Bird, V. J., Macpherson, R., et al. (2015). Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. Implementation Science, 10(1), 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locock, L. (2001). Maps and journeys: Redesign in the NHS. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvlie, L., Downs, C., & Reason, B. (2008). Bottom-line experiences: Measuring the value of design in service. Design Management Review, 19(1), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mannonen, P., Kaipio, J., & Nieminen, M. P. (2017). Patient-centred design of healthcare services: Meaningful events as basis for patient experiences of families. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 234, 206–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manschot, M., & Sleeswijk Visser, F. (2011). Experience-value: A framework for determining values in service design approaches. In: Proceedings of IASDR 2011, TU Delft, Delft, October 31–November 4, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A. (2008). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, B., Furness, T., Dhital, D., & Ireland, S. (2014). Recovery-oriented care in older-adult acute inpatient mental health settings in Australia: An exploratory study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(10), 1938–1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meroni, A., & Sangiorgi, D. (2011). Design for services. Surrey: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham, C., & Carr, S. (2009). Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Research briefing 31. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Co-production, synergy and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, M. M., Zafran, H., Stewart, J., Salsberg, J., Ells, C., Rouleau, S., et al. (2014). Transforming mental health services: A participatory mixed methods study to promote and evaluate the implementation of recovery-oriented services. Implementation Science, 9(1), 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polaine, A., Løvlie, L., & Reason, B. (2013). Service design: From insight to implementation. New York: Rosenfeld Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, N., & Coulter, A. (2007). Is the NHS becoming more patient-centred? Trends from the national surveys of NHS patients in England 2002–07. Oxhattond: Picker Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29(2), 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, G., Boardman, J., & Burns, M. (2010). Implementing recovery. A methodology for organisation change. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, G., Boardman, J., & Slade, M. (2008). Making recovery a reality. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slade, M., Amering, M., Farkas, M., Hamilton, B., O’Hagan, M., Panther, G., et al. (2014). Uses and abuses of recovery: Implementing recovery-oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomes, N. (2006). The patient as a policy factor: A historical case study of the consumer/survivor movement in mental health. Health Affairs, 25(3), 720–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2001). The world health report 2001 – mental health: New understanding, new hope. World Health Organisation (WHO). Retrieved August 3, 2017, from http://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/whr01_en.pdf?ua=1

  • Woodruff, R. B., & Gardial, S. F. (1996). Know your customers: New approaches to understanding customer value and satisfaction. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Foglieni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Foglieni, F., Segato, F., Sangiorgi, D., Carrera, M. (2019). Evaluating Co-production in Mental Health Services as a Support for Co-design Activities. In: Pfannstiel, M.A., Rasche, C. (eds) Service Design and Service Thinking in Healthcare and Hospital Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00749-2_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics