Advertisement

Polymers as Water Disinfectants

  • Chin Wei LaiEmail author
  • Kian Mun Lee
  • Bey Fen Leo
  • Christelle Pau Ping Wong
  • Soon Weng Chong
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series on Polymer and Composite Materials book series (SSPCM)

Abstract

Today, microbial infection appeared as one of the most critical environmental pollutions from our water stream. Indeed, the rising of public awareness for water pollution and water security has urged both researchers and industries to develop cost-effective antimicrobial polymer system. Although a range of polymers have antimicrobial properties, the most frequently studied polymer for water disinfection is chitosan. It offers several advantages, including biodegradable, non-toxic in nature, biocompatible and inexpensive, as compared to other low molecular weight antimicrobial polymers. In general, low molecular weight antimicrobial agents suffer several disadvantages, such as toxicity to the environment and short-term antimicrobial ability. Moreover, using chitosan biopolymer could enhance the efficacy of some existing antimicrobial agents and antifungal agents and minimize the environmental problems. In this chapter, the brief introduction of chitosan as well as modified chitosan on the development of water disinfection is extensively discussed. In particular, this chapter discusses the physicochemical properties of chitosan and different synthesis approaches for chitosan.

References and Future Readings

  1. 1.
    Wang B, Zhu Y, Bai Z, Luque R, Xuan J (2017) Functionalized chitosan biosorbents with ultra-high performance, mechanical strength and tunable selectivity for heavy metals in wastewater treatment. Chem Eng J 325:350–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ikeda T, Yamaguchi H, Tazuke S (1984) New polymeric biocides: synthesis and antibacterial activities of polycations with pendant biguanide groups. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 26:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen Y, Worley S, Kim J, Wei C-I, Chen T-Y, Santiago J, Williams J, Sun G (2003) Biocidal poly (styrenehydantoin) beads for disinfection of water. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:280–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Damm C, Münstedt H, Rösch A (2008) The antimicrobial efficacy of polyamide 6/silver-nano-and microcomposites. Mater Chem Phys 108:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muñoz-Bonilla A, Fernández-García M (2012) Polymeric materials with antimicrobial activity. Prog Polym Sci 37:281–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tiller JC, Liao C-J, Lewis K, Klibanov AM (2001) Designing surfaces that kill bacteria on contact. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5981–5985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Isquith AJ, Gettings RL (1986) Insoluble polymeric contact preservatives. Google Patents 1986Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bonnett R, Krysteva MA, Lalov IG, Artarsky SV (2006) Water disinfection using photosensitizers immobilized on chitosan. Water Res 40:1269–1275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Badawy ME, Rabea EI (2011) A biopolymer chitosan and its derivatives as promising antimicrobial agents against plant pathogens and their applications in crop protection. Int J Carbohydr ChemGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahmed S, Ikram S (2017) Chitosan: derivatives, composites and applications. WileyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahmed AE-SI, Cavalli G, Bushell ME, Wardell JN, Pedley S, Charles K, Hay JN (2011) New approach to produce water free of bacteria, viruses, and halogens in a recyclable system. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:847–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kenawy E-R, Abdel-Hay FI, El-Shanshoury AE-RR, El-Newehy MH (1998) Biologically active polymers: synthesis and antimicrobial activity of modified glycidyl methacrylate polymers having a quaternary ammonium and phosphonium groups. J Controlled Release 50:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peng H, Wu J, Wang Y, Wang H, Liu Z, Shi Y, Guo X (2016) A facile approach for preparation of underwater superoleophobicity cellulose/chitosan composite aerogel for oil/water separation. Appl Phys A: Mater Sci Process 122Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang X, Uchiyama S (2013) Polymers for biosensors construction, in: state of the art in biosensors-general aspects. InTechGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahmed S, Ikram S (2015) Chitosan & its derivatives: a review in recent innovations. Int J Pharm Sci Res 6:14Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baxter A, Dillon M, Taylor KA, Roberts GA (1992) Improved method for ir determination of the degree of N-acetylation of chitosan. Int J Biol Macromol 14:166–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Younes I, Ghorbel-Bellaaj O, Chaabouni M, Rinaudo M, Souard F, Vanhaverbeke C, Jellouli K, Nasri M (2014) Use of a fractional factorial design to study the effects of experimental factors on the chitin deacetylation. Int J Biol Macromol 70:385–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vakili M, Rafatullah M, Salamatinia B, Abdullah AZ, Ibrahim MH, Tan KB, Gholami Z, Amouzgar P (2014) Application of chitosan and its derivatives as adsorbents for dye removal from water and wastewater: a review. Carbohyd Polym 113:115–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bina B, Mehdinejad M, Nikaeen M, Attar HM (2009) Effectiveness of chitosan as natural coagulant aid in treating turbid waters. J Environ Health Sci Eng 6:247–252Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yep T (2016) Application of chitosan in the treatment of wastewater from agricultural sources. University of Windsor (Canada)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kenawy E-R, Worley S, Broughton R (2007) The chemistry and applications of antimicrobial polymers: a state-of-the-art review. Biomacromol 8:1359–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsaih ML, Chen RH (1999) Molecular weight determination of 83% degree of decetylation chitosan with non-Gaussian and wide range distribution by high-performance size exclusion chromatography and capillary viscometry. J Appl Polym Sci 71:1905–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang W, Bo S, Li S, Qin W (1991) Determination of the Mark-Houwink equation for chitosans with different degrees of deacetylation. Int J Biol Macromol 13:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang H, Neau SH (2001) In vitro degradation of chitosan by a commercial enzyme preparation: effect of molecular weight and degree of deacetylation. Biomaterials 22:1653–1658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ogawa K (1991) Effect of heating an aqueous suspension of chitosan on the crystallinity and polymorphs. Agric Biol Chem 55:2375–2379Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ogawa K, Yui T (1993) Crystallinity of partially N-acetylated chitosans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 57:1466–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wiśniewska-Wrona M, Niekraszewicz A, Ciechańska D, Pospieszny H, Orlikowski LB (2007) Biological properties of chitosan degradation products. Pol Chitin Soc Monogr 12:149–156Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rinaudo M (2006) Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 31:603–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Percot A, Viton C, Domard A (2003) Characterization of shrimp shell deproteinization. Biomacromol 4:1380–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Al Sagheer F, Al-Sughayer M, Muslim S, Elsabee MZ (2009) Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from marine sources in Arabian Gulf. Carbohyd Polym 77:410–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zargar V, Asghari M, Dashti A (2015) A review on chitin and chitosan polymers: structure, chemistry, solubility, derivatives, and applications. ChemBioEng Rev 2:204–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chang KLB, Tsai G, Lee J, Fu W-R (1997) Heterogeneous N-deacetylation of chitin in alkaline solution. Carbohyd Res 303:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Younes I, Rinaudo M (2015) Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Struct Prop Appl Mar Drugs 13:1133–1174Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tokuyasu K, Ohnishi-Kameyama M, Hayashi K (1996) Purification and characterization of extracellular chitin deacetylase from Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 60:1598–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tsigos I, Bouriotis V (1995) Purification and characterization of chitin deacetylase from Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. J Biol Chem 270:26286–26291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gao X-D, Katsumoto T, Onodera K (1995) Purification and characterization of chitin deacetylase from Absidia coerulea. J Biochem 117:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Muzzarelli RA, Rocchetti R (1985) Determination of the degree of acetylation of chitosans by first derivative ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Carbohyd Polym 5:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    W.U.J.W. Supply, S.M. Programme (2014) Progress on drinking water and sanitation: 2014 update. World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sobsey MD, Stauber CE, Casanova LM, Brown JM, Elliott MA (2008) Point of use household drinking water filtration: a practical, effective solution for providing sustained access to safe drinking water in the developing world. Environ Sci Technol 42:4261–4267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Periolatto M, Ferrero F, Vineis C, Varesano A (2014) Antibacterial water filtration by cationized or chitosan coated cotton gauze. Chem Eng Trans 38:235–240Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kumar MNR (2000) A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React Funct Polym 46:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Crittenden JC, Trussell RR, Hand DW, Howe KJ, Tchobanoglous G (2012) MWH’s water treatment: principles and design. WileyGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Budd GC, Hess AF, Shorney-Darby H, Neemann JJ, Spencer CM, Bellamy JD, Hargette PH (2004) Coagulation applications for new treatment goals. J (Am Water Works Assoc) 96:102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cheng Y-L, Wong R-J, Lin JC-T, Huang C, Lee D-J, Lai J-Y (2010) Pre-treatment of natural organic matters containing raw water using coagulation. Sep Sci Technol 45:911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Matilainen A, Vepsäläinen M, Sillanpää M (2010) Natural organic matter removal by coagulation during drinking water treatment: a review. Adv Coll Interface Sci 159:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Faust SD, Aly OM (1998) Chemistry of water treatment. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Teh SJ, Yeoh SL, Lee KM, Lai CW, Abdul Hamid SB, Thong KL (2016) Effect of reduced graphene oxide-hybridized ZnO thin films on the photoinactivation of Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. J Photochem Photobiol, B 161:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Salvadori M, Coleman B, Louie M, McEwen S, McGeer A (2004) Consumption of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli-contaminated well water: human health impact. PSI Clin Res:6–25Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Quick J, Cumley N, Wearn CM, Niebel M, Constantinidou C, Thomas CM, Pallen MJ, Moiemen NS, Bamford A, Oppenheim B (2014) Seeking the source of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in a recently opened hospital: an observational study using whole-genome sequencing. BMJ Open 4:e006278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC (2011) Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 27:4020–4028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Warheit DB (2008) How meaningful are the results of nanotoxicity studies in the absence of adequate material characterization? Toxicol Sci 101:183–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Guibal E, Cambe S, Bayle S, Taulemesse J-M, Vincent T (2013) Silver/chitosan/cellulose fibers foam composites: from synthesis to antibacterial properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 393:411–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Motshekga SC, Ray SS (2017) Highly efficient inactivation of bacteria found in drinking water using chitosan-bentonite composites: modelling and breakthrough curve analysis. Water Res 111:213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Li Q, Mahendra S, Lyon DY, Brunet L, Liga MV, Li D, Alvarez PJ (2008) Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications. Water Res 42:4591–4602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chien R-C, Yen M-T, Mau J-L (2016) Antimicrobial and antitumor activities of chitosan from shiitake stipes, compared to commercial chitosan from crab shells. Carbohyd Polym 138:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jana S, Laha B, Maiti S (2015) Boswellia gum resin/chitosan polymer composites: controlled delivery vehicles for aceclofenac. Int J Biol Macromol 77:303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Van Hoa N, Khong TT, Quyen TTH, Trung TS (2016) One-step facile synthesis of mesoporous graphene/Fe3O4/chitosan nanocomposite and its adsorption capacity for a textile dye. J Water Process Eng 9:170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ishihara M, Nguyen VQ, Mori Y, Nakamura S, Hattori H (2015) Adsorption of silver nanoparticles onto different surface structures of chitin/chitosan and correlations with antimicrobial activities. Int J Mol Sci 16:13973–13988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ito K, Saito A, Fujie T, Miyazaki H, Kinoshita M, Saitoh D, Ohtsubo S, Takeoka S (2016) Development of a ubiquitously transferrable silver-nanoparticle-loaded polymer nanosheet as an antimicrobial coating. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 104:585–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Grumezescu AM, Andronescu E, Holban AM, Ficai A, Ficai D, Voicu G, Grumezescu V, Balaure PC, Chifiriuc CM (2013) Water dispersible cross-linked magnetic chitosan beads for increasing the antimicrobial efficiency of aminoglycoside antibiotics. Int J Pharm 454:233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zain NM, Stapley A, Shama G (2014) Green synthesis of silver and copper nanoparticles using Ascorbic acid and Chitosan for antimicrobial applications. Carbohyd Polym 112:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lee SJ, Heo DN, Moon J-H, Ko W-K, Lee JB, Bae MS, Park SW, Kim JE, Lee DH, Kim E-C (2014) Electrospun chitosan nanofibers with controlled levels of silver nanoparticles. Preparation, characterization and antibacterial activity. Carbohyd Polym 111:530–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    An J, Ji Z, Wang D, Luo Q, Li X (2014) Preparation and characterization of uniform-sized chitosan/silver microspheres with antibacterial activities. Mater Sci Eng, C 36:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Punitha N, Ramesh P, Geetha D (2015) Spectral, morphological and antibacterial studies of β-cyclodextrin stabilized silver–Chitosan nanocomposites. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 136:1710–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ahamed M, AlSalhi MS, Siddiqui M (2010) Silver nanoparticle applications and human health. Clin Chim Acta 411:1841–1848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kumar-Krishnan S, Prokhorov E, Hernández-Iturriaga M, Mota-Morales JD, Vázquez-Lepe M, Kovalenko Y, Sanchez IC, Luna-Bárcenas G (2015) Chitosan/silver nanocomposites: synergistic antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles and silver ions. Eur Polymer J 67:242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Yang C-H, Wang L-S, Chen S-Y, Huang M-C, Li Y-H, Lin Y-C, Chen P-F, Shaw J-F, Huang K-S (2016) Microfluidic assisted synthesis of silver nanoparticle–chitosan composite microparticles for antibacterial applications. Int J Pharm 510:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Akhavan O, Ghaderi E (2010) Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano 4:5731–5736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mazaheri M, Akhavan O, Simchi A (2014) Flexible bactericidal graphene oxide–chitosan layers for stem cell proliferation. Appl Surf Sci 301:456–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Liu S, Zeng TH, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R, Kong J, Chen Y (2011) Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 5:6971–6980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Marta B, Potara M, Iliut M, Jakab E, Radu T, Imre-Lucaci F, Katona G, Popescu O, Astilean S (2015) Designing chitosan–silver nanoparticles–graphene oxide nanohybrids with enhanced antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Colloids Surf, A 487:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Jiang Y, Gong J-L, Zeng G-M, Ou X-M, Chang Y-N, Deng C-H, Zhang J, Liu H-Y, Huang S-Y (2016) Magnetic chitosan–graphene oxide composite for anti-microbial and dye removal applications. Int J Biol Macromol 82:702–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Liu N, Chen X-G, Park H-J, Liu C-G, Liu C-S, Meng X-H, Yu L-J (2006) Effect of MW and concentration of chitosan on antibacterial activity of Escherichia coli. Carbohyd Polym 64:60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Liu H, Bao J, Du Y, Zhou X, Kennedy JF (2006) Effect of ultrasonic treatment on the biochemphysical properties of chitosan. Carbohyd Polym 64:553–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Mekahlia S, Bouzid B (2009) Chitosan-copper (II) complex as antibacterial agent: synthesis, characterization and coordinating bond-activity correlation study. Phys Proc 2:1045–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ancona A, Sportelli M, Trapani A, Picca R, Palazzo C, Bonerba E, Mezzapesa F, Tantillo G, Trapani G, Cioffi N (2014) Synthesis and characterization of hybrid copper–chitosan nano-antimicrobials by femtosecond laser-ablation in liquids. Mater Lett 136:397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Arjunan N, Singaravelu CM, Kulanthaivel J, Kandasamy J (2017) A potential photocatalytic, antimicrobial and anticancer activity of chitosan-copper nanocomposite. Int J Biol MacromolGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Pham T-D, Lee B-K (2014) Cu doped TiO 2/GF for photocatalytic disinfection of Escherichia coli in bioaerosols under visible light irradiation: application and mechanism. Appl Surf Sci 296:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chin Wei Lai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kian Mun Lee
    • 1
  • Bey Fen Leo
    • 1
  • Christelle Pau Ping Wong
    • 1
  • Soon Weng Chong
    • 1
  1. 1.Nanotechnology & Catalysis Research Centre (NANOCAT)University of Malaya (UM)Kuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations