Abstract
Ethical and political debates on conception and abortion are often hot and one-sided. In an attempt to present a balanced view, we will discuss the whole spectrum of issues, from normal conception on one side to surrogate motherhood on the other. The main ethical issues are female/male imbalance regarding the side effects of contraception, uncritical use of the “morning-after pill,” abortion on demand without accompanying counselling, preimplantation or prenatal screening for selection of fetus regarding gender, abortion for minor fetal abnormalities, artificial insemination for a healthy woman, anonymity in case of donation of sperm or egg cells, and financial compensation for surrogate motherhood.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Pills with mifepristone (progestorone blockers) and misoprostol (induction of uterine contraction) as active substances. In many countries, these drugs are sold as over-the-counter drugs.
- 2.
See also seminar paper nr. 42.
References
Ziglar S, Hunter TS. The effect of hormonal oral contraception on acquisition of peak bone mineral density of adolescents and young women. J Pharm Pract. 2012;25:331–40.
O’Brien SH. Contraception-related venous thromboembolism in adolescents. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014;40:66–71.
Primic-Žakelj M, Evstifeeva T, Ravnihar B, Boyle P. Breast-cancer risk and oral contraceptive use in Slovenian women aged 25 to 54. Int J Cancer. 1995;62:414–20.
MacPherson Y. Images and icons: harnessing the power of media to reduce sex-selective abortion in India. Gend Dev. 2007;15:413–23.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sperm_donation_laws_by_country
Suggested Reading
Bawany MH, Padela AI. Hymenoplasty and Muslim patients: Islamic ethico-legal perspectives. J Sex Med. 2017;14:1003–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.06.005.
Benward J. Mandatory counseling for gamete donation recipients: ethical dilemmas. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:507–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1154.
Birkhäuser M. Ethical issues in human reproduction: protestant perspectives in the light of European protestant and reformed churches. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:955–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2013.825716.
Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Frith L, Jones C. Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: a critical analysis of the research evidence. J Law Med. 2012;19:769–89.
Burrell C, Edozien LC. Surrogacy in modern obstetric practice. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:272–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.004.
Brezina PR, Kutteh WH. Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing. BMJ. 2015;350:g7611. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7611.
Catlin AJ, Volat D. When the fetus is alive but the mother is not: critical care somatic support as an accepted model of care in the twenty-first century? Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2009;21:267–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2009.01.004.
Gong D, Liu YL, Zheng Z, Tian YF, Li Z. An overview on ethical issues about sperm donation. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:645–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2009.61.
Holten L, de Miranda E. Women’s motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk homebirth: an exploration of the literature on ‘birthing outside the system’. Midwifery. 2016;38:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.03.010.
Howe D. Ethics of prenatal ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;28:443–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.10.005.
Johnson BR Jr, Kismödi E, Dragoman MV, Temmerman M. Conscientious objection to provision of legal abortion care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(Suppl 3):S60–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60004-1.
Kamm FM. Bioethical prescriptions: to create, end, choose, and improve lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013. ISBN-13: 978-0190649616.
Lackie E, Fairchild A. The birth control pill, thromboembolic disease, science and the media: a historical review of the relationship. Contraception. 2016;94:295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.009.
Lanzone A. Ethical issues in human reproduction: catholic perspectives. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:953–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2013.825717.
Londra L, Wallach E, Zhao Y. Assisted reproduction: ethical and legal issues. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19:264–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2014.07.003.
Mercurio MR. Pediatric obstetrical ethics: medical decision-making by, with, and for pregnant early adolescents. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40:237–46. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2015.12.013.
Minear MA, Alessi S, Allyse M, Michie M, Chandrasekharan S. Noninvasive prenatal genetic testing: current and emerging ethical, legal, and social issues. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:369–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-090314-050000.
Morrell KM, Chavkin W. Conscientious objection to abortion and reproductive healthcare: a review of recent literature and implications for adolescents. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27:333–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000196.
Neri M, Turillazzi E, Pascale N, Riezzo I, Pomara C. Egg production and donation: a new frontier in the global landscape of cross-border reproductive care: ethical concerns. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2016;17:316–20.
Pace TN. Bioethics: issues and dilemmas. Waltham, MA: Nova Biomedical; 2013. ISBN-13: 978-1617282904.
Ravelingien A, Provoost V, Pennings G. Open-identity sperm donation: how does offering donor-identifying information relate to donor-conceived offspring’s wishes and needs? J Bioeth Inq. 2015;12:503–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-014-9550-3.
Samorinha C, Pereira M, Machado H, Figueiredo B, Silva S. Factors associated with the donation and non-donation of embryos for research: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2014;20:641–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu026.
Schenker JG. Human reproduction: Jewish perspectives. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:945–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2013.825715.
Serour GI, Serour AG. Ethical issues in infertility. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;43:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.02.008.
Zampas C. Legal and ethical standards for protecting women’s human rights and the practice of conscientious objection in reproductive healthcare settings. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;123(Suppl 3):S63–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60005-3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zwitter, M. (2019). Ethics at the Beginning of Life. In: Medical Ethics in Clinical Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00719-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00719-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00718-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00719-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)