Abstract
This paper describes an exploration process aligned with the core domain of Service Science inside a critical sector of Society, aiming at developing City in a sustainable, responsible, inclusive way. The paper focuses on defining the Public Safety as a Service concept in an inclusive and responsible value co-creation urban design vision for liveable cities. It explains how service intelligence can act on immaterial artefacts to transform data into information to generate value co-creation processes whose outcomes are applied to the evolution of knowledge in public safety services. Public safety is approached within a service ecosystem perspective, following the global targets of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction as an application perspective. Managerial implication are approached from two perspectives: establishment of governance principles with the help of Elinor Ostrom’s works, and a Viable Systems Approach on the response to disasters operating rules.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
UN: World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, ST/ESA/SER.A/366 (2015)
IBM: Making Sense of a Sensored World. IBM Smarter Planet. https://www.ibm.com/
Cisco: Smart+connected Communities. Changing a City, a Country, the World. Cisco White paper. https://www.cisco.com/
Siemens: Siemens City Cockpit White paper. City Cockpit in Singapore: Collective Intelligence - Real Time Government. Siemens. https://www.siemens.com/
Microsoft: Microsoft Citynext White paper. Accelerating the Digital Transformation of Smart Cities and Smart Communities. Microsoft. https://enterprise.microsoft.com/
Greenfield, A.: Against the Smart City (the City is Here for You to Use, Part i). Amazon Digital Services LLC, Kindle edn, Do Projects, 1.3 edn (2013)
UrbanScale: Design for Networked Cities and Citizens. UrbanScale. http://urbanscale.org/
LiveableCities: Transforming the Engineering of Cities for Global and Societal Wellbeing. Liveable Cities. http://liveablecities.org.uk/
UN: Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Goal 11: Make Cities Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable. United Nations (2017). http://www.un.org/
Ng, I.C., Wakenshaw, S.Y.: The internet-of-things: review and research directions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 34(1), 3–21 (2017)
Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M.: Internet of things (IoT): a vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7), 1645–1660 (2013)
Sundmaeker, H., Guillemin, P., Friess, P., Woelfflé, S.: Vision and challenges for realising the Internet of Things. Clust. Eur. Res. Proj. Internet Things Eur. Comm. 3(3), 34–36 (2010)
Soriano, J., et al.: Internet of services. In: Bertin, E., Crespi, N., Magedanz, T. (eds.) Evolution of Telecommunication Services. LNCS, vol. 7768, pp. 283–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41569-2_14
Moßgraber, J., et al.: The sensor to decision chain in crisis management. In: Boersma, K., Tomaszewski, B. (eds.) CoRe Paper - Universal Design of ICT in Emergency Management, Proceedings of the 15th ISCRAM Conference - Rochester, NY, USA, May 2018 (2018)
Mims, C.: The Internet of Things isn’t things, it’s services. Wall Str. J. (2016). https://www.wsj.com/
Estevez, P.A.: CIS in the next decade. IEEE Comput. Intell. Soc. (2016). http://cis.ieee.org/
Leather, A.: Internet of Things in public safety. Frost & Sullivan Webcasts (2015). https://ww2.frost.com/
Sims, K.: Top public safety and security tech trends for 2017. Hexagon Safety & Infrastructure (2017). www.hexagonsafetyinfrastructure.com/
Tiburon: PSaaS: The Next Evolution of Public Safety and Security is Here. Tiburon. http://www.gradicom.com/
Concepts To Operations: Public Safety as a Service (PSaaS). Concepts to Operations. http://www.concepts2ops.com/psaas/
The Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda - Transition Towards Sustainable and Liveable Urban Futures. JPI Urban Europe (2015). http://jpi-urbaneurope.eu/
Lim, C., Kim, M.J., Kim, K.H., Kim, K.J., Maglio, P.P.: Using data to advance service: managerial issues and theoretical implications from action research. J. Serv. Theory Pract. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-08-2016-0141
Spohrer, J.C., Kwan, S.K., Demirkan, H.: Service science: on reflection. In: Cinquini, L., Minin, A.D., Varaldo, R. (eds.) New Business Models and Value Creation: A Service Science Perspective, pp. 7–24. Springer, Milano (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2838-8_2
Macbeth, S., Pitt, J.V.: Self-organising management of user-generated data and knowledge. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 30(3), 237–264 (2015)
Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., Strokosch, K.: Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment? Publ. Manag. Rev. 18(5), 639–653 (2016)
Tokoro, N.: The Smart City and the Co-creation of Value: A Source of New Competitiveness in a Low-Carbon Society. Springer, Tokyo (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55846-0
Magno, F., Cassia, F.: Public administrators’ engagement in services co-creation: factors that foster and hinder organisational learning about citizens. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 26(11–12), 1161–1172 (2015)
Rytilahti, P., Miettinen, S., Vuontisjärvi, H.-R.: The theoretical landscape of service design. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU 2015. LNCS, vol. 9186, pp. 86–97. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20886-2_9
UN: Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. In: United Nations, Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction, Sendai, Japan, 18–20 March 2015
UNISDR: UNISDR annual report 2016. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) (2017). https://www.unisdr.org/
UN: Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) 2005–2015. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (2005). https://www.unisdr.org/we/coordinate/hfa
UN: Chart of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations (2015). https://www.unisdr.org/
Norris, A., Gonzalez, J., Martinez, S., Parry, D.: Disaster e-Health framework for community resilience. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2018, Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 35–44 (2018)
Grasso, N., Lingua, A.M., Musci, M.A., Noardo, F., Piras, M.: An INSPIRE-compliant open-source GIS for fire-fighting management. Nat. Hazards 90(2), 623–637 (2018)
Navas, S.R., Miyazaki, K.: Exploring “Big Data” applications for disaster management: a scientific keyword word co-occurrence network analysis. JAIST Repository, Japan Society for Research Policy and Innovation Management (2016). https://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/
Heikkurinen, M., Schiffers, M., Kranzlmüller, D.: Environmental computing 1.0: the dawn of a concept. In: International Symposium on Grids and Clouds (ISGC) 2015, PoS(ISGC2015)030. Academia Sinica, Taipei (2015)
Grasso, V., Singh, A., Pathak, J.: Early warning systems: state-of-art analysis and future directions. In: United Nations Environment Programme, Division of Early Warning and Assessment (2012). http://www.unep.org
Roles of local government - Public Safety. Michigan Townships Association. https://www.michigantownships.org/publicsafety.asp
Berrahal, S., Boudriga, N., Bagula, A.: Cooperative sensor-clouds for public safety services in infrastructure-less areas. In: 2016 22nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), pp. 222–229. IEEE (2016)
Raza, A.: LTE network strategy for smart city public safety. In: IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices for the Transformation of Societies (EmergiTech), pp. 34–37. IEEE (2016)
Manzalini, A., Crespi, N.: An edge operating system enabling anything-as-a-service. IEEE Commun. Mag. 54(3), 62–67 (2016)
Safety as a Service. http://www.safetyasaservice.com
UN: Americas to Agree on Sendai Framework Action Plan. United Nations (2017). https://www.unisdr.org/archive/52207
Public Safety Canada. https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/
UN: National framework in order to reduce earthquakes by multi-stakeholder participation in Turkey: National earthquake strategy and action plan of Turkey (UDSEP-2023). United Nations (2013). https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/50178
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44(1), 5–23 (2016)
Rafati, L.: Capability-actor-resource-service: a conceptual modelling approach for value-driven strategic sourcing. Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University, Belgium (2018)
Pels, J., Barile, S., Saviano, M., Polese, F., Carrubbo, L.: The contribution of VSA and SDL perspectives to strategic thinking in emerging economies. Manag. Serv. Qual. 24(6), 565–591 (2014)
Vargo, S.L., Akaka, M.A.: Value cocreation and service systems (re)formation: a service ecosystems view. Serv. Sci. 4(3), 207–217 (2012)
Lim, C., Kim, K.H., Kim, M.J., Heo, J.Y., Kim, K.J., Maglio, P.P.: From data to value: a nine-factor framework for data-based value creation in information-intensive services. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 39, 121–135 (2018)
Lim, C.H., Kim, K.J.: Information service blueprint: a service blueprinting framework for information-intensive services. Serv. Sci. 6(4), 296–312 (2014)
Akaka, M.A., Vargo, S.L.: Technology as an operant resource in service (eco)systems. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 12(3), 367–384 (2014)
Vargo, S.L., Akaka, M.A., Vaughan, C.M.: Conceptualizing value: a service-ecosystem view. J. Creat. Value 3(2), 117–124 (2017)
Toots, M., et al.: A framework for data-driven public service co-production. In: Janssen, M., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2017. LNCS, vol. 10428, pp. 264–275. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64677-0_22
Johnson, S.P., Menor, L.J., Roth, A.V., Chase, R.B.: A critical evaluation of the new service development process: integrating innovation and service design. In: Fitzsimmons, J.A., Fitzsimmons, M.J. (eds.) New Service Development: Creating Memorable Experiences, pp. 1–32. Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks (2000)
Clayton, R.J., Backhouse, C.J., Dani, S.: Evaluating existing approaches to product-service system design: a comparison with industrial practice. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 23(3), 272–298 (2012)
Drǎgoicea, M., Salehpour, S., Nóvoa, H., Oltean, V.E.: Towards a proposal for the sustainability through institutions in public transport services in times of emergency. In: Za, S., Drăgoicea, M., Cavallari, M. (eds.) IESS 2017. LNBIP, vol. 279, pp. 355–369. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56925-3_28
Liew, A.: DIKIW: data, information, knowledge, intelligence, wisdom and their interrelationships. Bus. Manag. Dyn. 2(10), 49–62 (2013)
Baškarada, S., Koronios, A.: Data, information, knowledge, wisdom (DIKW): a semiotic theoretical and empirical exploration of the hierarchy and its quality dimension. Aust. J. Inf. Syst., [S.l.] 18(1) (2013). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v18i1.748. ISSN 1449-8618
Mattsson, L.G., Jenelius, E.: Vulnerability and resilience of transport systems-a discussion of recent research. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 81, 16–34 (2015)
Bitner, M.J., Zeithaml, V.A., Gremler, D.D.: Technology’s impact on the gaps model of service quality. In: Maglio, P., Kieliszewski, C., Spohrer, J. (eds.) Handbook of service science, pp. 197–218. Springer, Boston (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1628-0_10
Arthur, W.B.: The Nature of Technology: What it is and How it Evolves. Simon and Schuster, New York City (2009)
Ostrom, E.: Design principles and threats to sustainable organizations that manage commons. In: Paper for Electronic Conference on Small Farmer’s Economic Organizations, Organized by Julio A. Berdegue. Santiago, Chile, March 1999
Barile, S., Polese, F.: Linking the viable system and many-to-many network approaches to service-dominant logic and service science. Int. J. Qual. Serv. Sci. 2(1), 23–42 (2010)
Spohrer, J., Golinelli, G.M., Piciocchi, P., Bassano, C.: An integrated SS-VSA analysis of changing job roles. Serv. Sci. 2(1–2), 1–20 (2010)
Barile, S., Polese, F.: Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Serv. Sci. 2(1–2), 21–40 (2010)
Polese, F., Tommasetti, A., Vesci, M., Carrubbo, L., Troisi, O.: Decision-making in smart service systems: a viable systems approach contribution to service science advances. In: Borangiu, T., Drăgoicea, M., Nóvoa, H. (eds.) IESS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 247, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32689-4_1
Badinelli, R., Barile, S., Ng, I., Polese, F., Saviano, M., Di Nauta, P.: Viable service systems and decision making in service management. J. Serv. Manag. 23(4), 498–526 (2012)
Spohrer, J., Bassano, C., Piciocchi, P., Siddike, M.A.K.: What makes a System Smart? Wise? In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W. (eds.) Advances in The Human Side of Service Engineering. AISC, pp. 23–34. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41947-3_3
Siddike, M.A.K., Iwano, K., Hidaka, K., Kohda, Y., Spohrer, J.: Wisdom service systems: harmonious interactions between people and machine. In: Freund, L.E., Cellary, W. (eds.) AHFE 2017. AISC, vol. 601, pp. 115–127. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60486-2_11
Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.P., Bailey, J., Gruhl, D.: Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer 40(1), 71–77 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Drăgoicea, M., Badr, N.G., Falcão e Cunha, J., Oltean, V.E. (2018). From Data to Service Intelligence: Exploring Public Safety as a Service. In: Satzger, G., Patrício, L., Zaki, M., Kühl, N., Hottum, P. (eds) Exploring Service Science. IESS 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00713-3_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00712-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00713-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)