Abstract
Prevention science is inherently pragmatic. While many mechanisms may contribute to risk for substance use and abuse, we are most concerned with those that are malleable through practical means. Basic research is most often focused on whether some mechanism increases risk or protection, with little attention to whether and how that mechanism can be changed. Applied research emphasizes pragmatic malleability, testing theories of how to change such mechanisms, as a basis for designing effective prevention programs. In this chapter we introduce two applied research designs that hold promise for developing and testing pragmatic malleability relevant for the prevention of substance use and abuse: microtrials and idiographic designs. Microtrials are brief experiments testing whether focused environmental manipulations can alter specific risk or protective mechanisms. We discuss how microtrials can be expanded to test whether interventions alter these mechanisms more strongly for some people than others and evaluate their strengths and limitations for substance abuse research. Idiographic designs use intensive repeated assessments to track continuity and change in key risk or protective mechanisms. They can be integrated with experimental designs to test intervention impact on risk and protective mechanisms as well as substance-use outcomes. We discuss several useful variants and review recent advances in statistical methods for handling the complex datasets they produce. We conclude with a discussion of how microtrials and idiographic methods can be used to enhance current substance-abuse prevention programs and support the development of more effective next-generation prevention trials.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asparouhov, T., Hamaker, E. L., & Muthén, B. (2017). Dynamic latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 24(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2016.1253479
Babcock, J. C., Gottman, J. M., Ryan, K. D., & Gottman, J. S. (2013). A component analysis of a brief psycho-educational couples’ workshop: One-year follow-up results. Journal of Family Therapy, 35(3), 252–280.
Ballenger, J. F., Best, S. R., Metzler, T. J., Wasserman, D. A., Mohr, D. C., Liberman, A., … Marmar, C. R. (2011). Patterns and predictors of alcohol use in male and female urban police officers. The American Journal on Addictions, 20(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2010.00092.x
Beltz, A. M., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2016). Dealing with multiple solutions in structural vector autoregressive models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(2–3), 357–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1151333
Boscarino, J. A., Rukstalis, M. R., Hoffman, S. N., Han, J. J., Erlich, P. M., Ross, S., … Stewart, W. F. (2011). Prevalence of prescription opioid-use disorder among chronic pain patients: Comparison of the DSM-5 vs. DSM-4 diagnostic criteria. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 30(3), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2011.581961
Bowman-Perrott, L., Burke, M. D., Zaini, S., Zhang, N., & Vannest, K. (2016). Promoting positive behavior using the good behavior game: A meta-analysis of single-case research. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(3), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715592355
Brody, G. H., Yu, T., & Beach, S. R. H. (2015). A differential susceptibility analysis reveals the “who and how” about adolescents’ responses to preventive interventions: Tests of first- and second-generation Gene × Intervention hypotheses. Development and Psychopathology, 27(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457941400128X
Cattell, R. B. (1952). Three basic factor-analytic research designs—their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054245
Chow, S.-M., Ho, M.-h. R., Hamaker, E. L., & Dolan, C. V. (2010). Equivalence and differences between structural equation modeling and state-space modeling techniques. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17(2), 303–332.
Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., … Long, B. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychologist, 48(10), 1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.10.1013
Dempsey, J., McQuillin, S., Butler, A., & Axelrad, M. (2016). Maternal depression and parent management training outcomes. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 23(3), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-016-9461-z
Dempsey, W., Liao, P., Klasnja, P., Nahum-Shani, I., & Murphy, S. A. (2015). Randomised trials for the Fitbit generation. Significance, 12(6), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00863.x
Dicianno, B. E., Mahajan, H., Guirand, A. S., & Cooper, R. A. (2012). Virtual electric power wheelchair driving performance of individuals with spastic cerebral palsy. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 91(10), 823–830.
Ding, D., Leister, E., Cooper, R. A., Cooper, R., Kelleher, A., Fitzgerald, S. G., & Boninger, M. L. (2008). Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevation seating functions in natural environment of wheelchair users. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45(7), 973–983.
Ding, D., Liu, H.-Y., Cooper, R., Cooper, R. A., Smailagic, A., & Siewiorek, D. (2010). Virtual coach technology for supporting self-care. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 21(1), 179–194.
Ferguson, S. G., Shiffman, S., Dunbar, M., & Schüz, N. (2016). Higher stimulus control is associated with less cigarette intake in daily smokers. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors: Journal Of The Society Of Psychologists In Addictive Behaviors, 30(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000149
Ferron, J. M., Bell, B. A., Hess, M. R., Rendina-Gobioff, G., & Hibbard, S. T. (2009). Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: The utility of multilevel modeling approaches. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.372
Fishbein, D. H., Hyde, C., Eldreth, D., Paschall, M. J., Hubal, R., Das, A., … Yung, B. (2006). Neurocognitive skills moderate urban male adolescents’ responses to preventive intervention materials. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 82(1), 47–60.
Fisher, P. A., Beauchamp, K. G., Roos, L. E., Noll, L. K., Flannery, J., & Delker, B. C. (2016). The neurobiology of intervention and prevention in early adversity. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112855
Fox, E., Zougkou, K., Ridgewell, A., & Garner, K. (2011). The serotonin transporter gene alters sensitivity to attention bias modification: Evidence for a plasticity gene. Biological Psychiatry, 70(11), 1049–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.07.004
Furberg, R. D. (2016). Biometrics & policing: Exploring psychophysiology in law enforcement officers. Paper presented at the 2016 Annual SAPOR Conference, Raleigh, NC.
Gottman, J., Ryan, K., Swanson, C., & Swanson, K. (2005). Proximal change experiments with couples: A methodology for empirically building a science of effective interventions for changing couples’ interaction. Journal of Family Communication, 5(3), 163–189. 127p.
Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series analysis. A comprehensive introduction for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graham, J. E., Karmarkar, A. M., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (2012). Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: Issues and methods. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(12), 2384–2384.
Hamaker, E. L., & Wichers, M. (2017). No time like the present: Discovering the hidden dynamics in intensive longitudinal data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416666518
Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs. Strategies for studying behavior change. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Howe, G. W., Beach, S., & Brody, G. (2010). Microtrial methods for translating gene-environment dynamics into preventive interventions. Prevention Science, 11(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0177-2
Howe, G. W., Beach, S. R. H., Brody, G. H., & Wyman, P. A. (2016). Translating genetic research into preventive intervention: The baseline target moderated mediator design. Frontiers in Psychology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01911
Howe, G. W., Reiss, D., & Yuh, J. (2002). Can prevention trials test theories of etiology? Development and Psychopathology, 14(4), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579402004029
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kotov, R., Gamez, W., Schmidt, F., & Watson, D. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821.
Lee, S.-Y., Hahn, C.-Y., Lee, J.-F., Huang, S.-Y., Chen, S.-L., Kuo, P.-H., … Lu, R.-B. (2010). MAOA interacts with the ALDH2 gene in anxiety depression alcohol dependence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 34(7), 1212–1218.
Lei, H., Nahum-Shani, I., Lynch, K., Oslin, D., & Murphy, S. A. (2012). A “SMART” design for building individualized treatment sequences. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8, 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143152
Leijten, P., Dishion, T. J., Thomaes, S., Raaijmakers, M. A. J., Orobio de Castro, B., & Matthys, W. (2015). Bringing parenting interventions back to the future: How randomized microtrials may benefit parenting intervention efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 22(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12087
Littell, R. C., Milliken, G. A., Stroup, W. W., Wolfinger, R. D., & Schabenberger, O. (2006). SAS for mixed models (2nd ed.). Cary, NC: SAS Press.
MacKinnon, D. P., Taborga, M. P., & Morgan-Lopez, A. A. (2002). Mediation designs for tobacco prevention research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 68(Suppl1), S69–S83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00216-8
Madhyastha, T. M., Hamaker, E. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Investigating spousal influence using moment-to-moment affect data from marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(2), 292–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023028
McCarthy, D. E., Ebssa, L., Witkiewitz, K., & Shiffman, S. (2015). Paths to tobacco abstinence: A repeated-measures latent class analysis. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 83(4), 696–708. https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000017
McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114(2), 376–390. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide. Eighth edition (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Noskova, T., Pivac, N., Nedic, G., Kazantseva, A., Gaysina, D., Faskhutdinova, G., … Seler, D. M. (2008). Ethnic differences in the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) in several European populations. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 32(7), 1735–1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2008.07.012
Owens, C., & Ferron, J. (2012). Synthesizing single-case studies: A Monte Carlo examination of a three-level meta-analytic model. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0180-y
Patterson, H. D., & Thompson, R. (1971). Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika, 58, 545.
Perrino, T., Pantin, H., Prado, G., Huang, S., Brincks, A., Howe, G., … Brown, C. H. (2014). Preventing internalizing symptoms among Hispanic adolescents: A synthesis across Familias Unidas trials. Prevention Science, 15(6), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-013-0448-9
Petras, H., & Masyn, K. (2010). General growth mixture analysis with antecedents and consequences of change. In A. Piquero & G. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 69–100). New York: Springer.
Petras, H., Masyn, K., & Ialongo, N. (2011). The developmental impact of two first grade preventive interventions on aggressive/disruptive behavior in childhood and adolescence: An application of latent transition growth mixture modeling. Prevention Science, 12(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-011-0216-7
Prado, G., Lopez, B., Szapocznik, J., Pantin, H., Briones, E., Schwartz, S. J., … Sabillon, E. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of a parent-centered intervention in preventing substance use and HIV risk behaviors in Hispanic adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(6), 914–926. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.914
Ridenour, T. A., Chen, S. H. K., Liu, H. Y., Hill, K., Bobashev, G., & Cooper, R. (2017). The clinical trials mosaic: Toward a range of clinical trials designs to optimize evidence-based treatment. Journal of Person Oriented Research, 3, 28–48.
Ridenour, T. A., Pineo, T., Maldonado Molina, M., & Hassmiller Lich, K. (2013). Toward rigorous idiographic research in prevention science: Comparison between three analytic strategies for testing preventive intervention in very small samples. Prevention Science, 14(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0311-4
Ridenour, T. A., Reynolds, M., Ahlqvist, O., Zhai, Z. W., Kirisci, L., Vanyukov, M. M., & Tarter, R. E. (2013). High and low neurobehavior disinhibition clusters within locales: Implications for community efforts to prevent substance use disorder. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 39(3), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2013.764884
Ridenour, T. A., Tarter, R. E., Reynolds, M., Mezzich, A., Kirisci, L., & Vanyukov, M. (2009). Neurobehavior disinhibition, parental substance use disorder, neighborhood quality and development of cannabis use disorder in boys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 102(1–3), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.009
Ridenour, T. A., Wittenborn, A. K., Raiff, B. R., Benedict, N., & Kane-Gill, S. (2016). Illustrating idiographic methods for translation research: Moderation effects, natural clinical experiments, and complex treatment-by-subgroup interactions. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0357-5
Sandler, I. N., Ayers, T. S., Wolchik, S. A., Tein, J.-Y., Kwok, O.-M., Haine, R. A., … Griffin, W. A. (2003). The Family Bereavement Program: Efficacy evaluation of a theory-based prevention program for parentally bereaved children and adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(3), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.3.587
Sandler, I. N., Braver, S. L., Wolchik, S. A., Pillow, D. R., & Gersten, J. C. (1991). Small theory and the strategic choices of prevention research. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19(6), 873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937889
Shiffman, S. (2009). Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in studies of substance use. Psychological Assessment, 21(4), 486–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017074
Simons, R. L., Lei, M. K., Beach, S. R. H., Brody, G. H., Philibert, R. A., Gibbons, F. X., & Gerrard, M. (2013). Differential sensitivity to context: GABRG1 enhances the acquisition of prototypes that serve as intermediate phenotypes for substance use. In J. MacKillop, M. R. Munafò, J. MacKillop, & M. R. Munafò (Eds.), Genetic influences on addiction: An intermediate phenotype approach (pp. 303–325). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stephens, P. C., Sloboda, Z., Stephens, R. C., Teasdale, B., Grey, S. F., Hawthorne, R. D., & Williams, J. (2009). Universal school-based substance abuse prevention programs: Modeling targeted mediators and outcomes for adolescent cigarette, alcohol and marijuana use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 102(1–3), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.016
Tarter, R. E., Kirisci, L., Habeych, M., Reynolds, M., & Vanyukov, M. (2004). Neurobehavior disinhibition in childhood predisposes boys to substance use disorder by young adulthood: Direct and mediated etiologic pathways. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 73(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.07.004
Teisl, M., Wyman, P. A., Cross, W., West, J., & Sworts, L. (2012). Adaptive intervention to address the needs of children with language delays and behavior problems: Proximal impact on emotion-regulation skill knowledge. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.
Thibodeau, E. L., August, G. J., Cicchetti, D., & Symons, F. J. (2016). Application of environmental sensitivity theories in personalized prevention for youth substance abuse: A transdisciplinary translational perspective. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0374-4
Van Ryzin, M. J., Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2012). Engaging parents in the family check-up in middle school: Longitudinal effects on family conflict and problem behavior through the high school transition. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(6), 627–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.10.255
Wichers, M. C., Barge-Schaapveld, D. Q. C. M., Nicolson, N. A., Peeters, F., de Vries, M., Mengelers, R., & van Os, J. (2009). Reduced stress-sensitivity or increased reward experience: The psychological mechanism of response to antidepressant medication. Neuropsychopharmacology, 34(4), 923–931. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2008.66
Wolchik, S. A., Griffin, W. A., West, S. G., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J.-Y., Coatsworth, D., … Greene, S. M. (2000). An experimental evaluation of theory-based mother and mother-child programs for children of divorce. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 843–856.
Yanovitzky, I. (2005). Sensation seeking and adolescent drug use: The mediating role of association with deviant peers and pro-drug discussions. Health Communication, 17(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327027hc1701_5
Zheng, Y., Wiebe, R. P., Cleveland, H. H., Molenaar, P. C., & Harris, K. S. (2013). An idiographic examination of day-to-day patterns of substance use craving, negative affect, and tobacco use among young adults in recovery. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 241–266.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Howe, G.W., Ridenour, T.A. (2019). Bridging the Gap: Microtrials and Idiographic Designs for Translating Basic Science into Effective Prevention of Substance Use. In: Sloboda, Z., Petras, H., Robertson, E., Hingson, R. (eds) Prevention of Substance Use. Advances in Prevention Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00627-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00627-3_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00625-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00627-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)