Abstract
This chapter presents a critical analysis of the traditional understanding of the ‘asylum seeker’ in international law and compares this with the definition in European Union (EU) asylum legislation, applicable before 2013, when the same definition of ‘asylum seeker’ was removed from the applicable legal instruments and only the term, ‘applicant’, was maintained. Essentially, it argues that the right of asylum seekers to receive asylum and the corresponding duty of EU states to grant asylum, created as a result of the development of a Common European Asylum System, have led to a different understanding of the ‘asylum seeker’ to that found in international law, namely as a distinct legal category, conditioned by the rights and duties imposed by EU law and the policies of the EU state of asylum. The chapter also briefly discusses some of the problems which the introduction of this ad hoc informal status has led to, under the previous EU reception regime.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Nonetheless, the ongoing case of Russian whistleblower, Maria Efimova, currently wanted by the Maltese courts to face fraud allegations, has challenged both the long held perception of EU countries as “safe” COO and the narrow definition of asylum seeker under EU asylum law—see Caruana (2018).
- 2.
See, for example, European Court of Human Rights, Suso Musa v Malta, App. No. 42337/12, 9 December 2013.
References
Asylum Information Database (aida). (2018). Country Report: Malta. Retrieved June 27, 2018, from http://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/malta
Asylum Seekers (UNHCR: The UN Refugee Agency, 2018). Retrieved June 27, 2018, from http://www.unhcr.org/asylum-seekers.html
Caruana, C. (2018). Pilatus whistleblower Efimova will not be extradited: Greek courts refuse prosecutor appeal. Times of Malta. Retrieved June 27, 2018, from https://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20180614/local/pilatus-whistleblower-efimova-will-not-be-extradited.681745
Collier, J. F., Maurer, B., & Suarez-Navaz, L. (1995). Sanctioned identities: Legal constructions of modern personhood. Identities, 2(1–2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962524
Gil-Bazo, M. (2006, November). Refugee Status, subsidiary protection, and the right to be granted asylum under EC law (Research paper No. 136). UNHCR.
Gil-Bazo, M. (2015). Asylum as a general principle of international law. International Journal of Refugee Law, 27(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeu062
Hathaway, J. C., & Foster, M. (2017). The law of refugee status., 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Refugees, Asylum-Seekers and Migrants (Amnesty International, 2018). Retrieved June 27, 2018, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/refugees-asylum-seekers-and-migrants/
UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). (2011). Handbook and guidelines on procedures and criteria for determining refugee status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 protocol relating to the status of refugees, HCR/1P/4/ENG/REV. 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dalli, J. (2019). Asylum Seeker. In: Bartolini, A., Cippitani, R., Colcelli, V. (eds) Dictionary of Statuses within EU Law. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00554-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00554-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00553-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00554-2
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)