Skip to main content

The Social Psychology and Neurobiology of Intergroup Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Islamophobia and Psychiatry
  • 1687 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the psychological and neurobiological correlates of ingroup and outgroup formation and intergroup conflict. We look at the social psychological and sociological theories as well as more recent empirical evidence around strong group formation and prejudice. The chapter also uncovers several important mitigating factors and some experimental approaches to reducing bias and conflict. We conclude with a look at how these findings and their application to the problem of Islamophobia might carry clinical implications for psychiatrists treating patients from marginalized Islamic populations.

The true hero is one who conquers his own anger and hatred. – the 14th Dalai Lama

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. For a good summary of the academic discussion, see Sayyid S. Racism and Islamophobia. International Centre for Muslim and non-Muslim Understanding Commentary 2011;4:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yudell M, Roberts D, DeSalle R, Tishkoff S. Taking race out of human genetics. Science. 2016;351(6273):564–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. University of Minnesota Libraries. Sociology: understanding and changing the social world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing Edition; 2016. p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DeMarree K, Clark C, Weeler SC, Brinol P, Petty R. On the pursuit of desired attitudes: wanting a different attitude affects information processing and behavior. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017;70:129–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Krueger JI, DiDonato TE. Social categorization and the perception of groups and group differences. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2(2):733–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. University of Minnesota Libraries. Principles of social psychology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing Edition; 2015. p. 550.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duval TS, Silvia PJ. Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(1):49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brewer MB, Pierce RP. Social identity complexity and outgroup tolerance. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2005;31:428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolf ST, Cohen TR, Kirchner JL, Rea A, Montoya RM. Reducing intergroup conflict through consideration of future conflict. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon Tepper School of Business; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robbins JM, Krueger JI. Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: a review and meta-analysis. Personal Soc Psychol Rev. 2005;9(1):32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crisp RJ, Beck SR. Reducing intergroup bias: the moderating role of ingroup identification. Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2005;8(2):173–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cox D, Lienesch R, Jones RP. Beyond economics: fears of cultural displacement pushed the white working class to trump. PRRI/The Atlantic Report 2017. Published online May 9, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Halperin E, Russell AG, Trzesniewski KH, Gross JJ, Dweck CS. Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science. 2011;333:1767–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Insel TR, Shapiro LE. Oxytocin receptor distribution reflects social organization in monogamous and polygamous voles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:5981–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirsch P, Essinger C, Chen Q, et al. Oxytocin modulates neural circuitry for social cognition and fear in humans. J Neurosci. 2005;25:11489–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rilling JK, Young LJ. The biology of mammalian parenting and its effect on offspring social development. Science. 2014;345:771–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Insel TR. The challenge of translation in social neuroscience: a review of oxytocin, vasopressin, and affiliative behavior. Neuron. 2010;65:768–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller G. The promise and perils of oxytocin. Science. 2013;339:267–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. American Physiological Society. Oxytocin raises aggression, cuts anxiety during lactation; similar effects on virgin rats. ScienceDaily. 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samuni L, Preis A, Mundry R, Deschner T, Crockford C, Wittig RM. Oxytocin reactivity during intergroup conflict in wild chimpanzees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;114:268–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shalvi S, De Dreu CKW. Oxytocin promotes group-serving dishonesty. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:5503–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. De Dreu CK, Gree LL, Van Kleef GA, Shalvi S, Handgraaf MJ. Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:1262–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. De Dreu CK, Greer LL, Handgraaf JM, et al. The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science. 2010;328:1408–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ten Velden FS, Daughters K, De Dreu CKW. Oxytocin promotes intuitive rather than deliberated cooperation with the in-group. Horm Behav. 2017;92:164–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Daughers K, Manstead AS, Ten Velden FS, De Dreu CK. Oxytocin modulates third-party sanctioning of selfish and generous behavior within and between groups. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;77:18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu L, Jenkins AC, Set E, et al. Damage to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects tradeoffs between honesty and self-interest. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:1319–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Phelps EA, O’Connor KJ, Cunningham WA, et al. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12:729–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hart AJ, Whalen PJ, Shin LM, McInerney SC, Fischer H, Rauch SL. Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport. 2000;11:23510–2355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cunningham WA, Johnson MK, Raye CL, Gatenby C, Gore JC, Banali MR. Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychol Sci. 2004;15:806–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lieberman MD, Hariri A, Jarcho JM, Eisenberger NI, Bookheimer SY. An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:720–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Campbell-Meiklejohn D, Simonsen A, Frith CD, Daw ND. Independent neural computation of value from other people’s confidence. J Neurosci. 2017;37:673–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmalzle R, Hacker FEK, Honey CJ, Hasson U. Engaged listeners: shared neural processing of powerful political speeches. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015;10:11370–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Garrett N, Lazzaro SC, Ariely D, Sharot T. The brain adapts to dishonesty. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1727–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu R, Mobbs D, Seymour B, Calder AJ. Insula and striatum mediate the default bias. J Neurosci. 2010;30:14702–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu X, Antony JW, Creery JD, Vargas IM, Bondenhausen GV, Paller KA. Unlearning implicit social biases during sleep. Science. 2015;348:1013–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Feld GB, Born J. Exploiting sleep to modify bad attitudes. Science. 2015;348:971–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gorman SE, Gorman JM. Denying to the grave: why we ignore the facts that will save us. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Edelson MG, Dudai Y, Dolan RJ, Sharot T. Brain substrates of recovery from misleading influence. J Neurosci. 2014;34:7744–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. McLoughlin N, Over H. Young children are more likely to spontaneously attribute mental states to members of their own group. Psychol Sci. 2017;28(10):1503–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gorman, S.E., Gorman, J.M. (2019). The Social Psychology and Neurobiology of Intergroup Conflict. In: Moffic, H., Peteet, J., Hankir, A., Awaad, R. (eds) Islamophobia and Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00512-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00512-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00511-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00512-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics