Skip to main content

Assessment and Recommendations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Trauma, Autism, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Abstract

The roots are tangled. Can we prune the ramifications? As has been mentioned many times throughout this book, a diagnosis of autism can help a child to access valuable services, including habilitative therapies, family supports and respite, and funding. Given the power vested by our healthcare system in the ASD label, it is not surprising that wait lists for autism diagnostic assessments are intolerably long. As a result, children with ASD wait unacceptably long intervals to access the medical diagnosis, a key to crucial services. Meanwhile, many children without ASD, who have screened positively or who have various red flags, also wait in this long line, only not to be told they do not meet diagnostic criteria for ASD. Even those children who do not end up being diagnosed with ASD have significant difficulty with development and/or behavior, often with serious accompanying impacts on family functioning. In most cases, they will likely receive a diagnosis, and with this new diagnosis, they will usually be given some direction to go for assistance. Often, the diagnostic referral centers which provide ASD assessments are able to provide some interventions targeting this new diagnosis. Frequently, however, new referrals will be generated, and then there will be new lines to wait in, for different diagnostic assessments. This can be a very painful, trying experience for families, who may well have hoped, even expected, that they were nearing some diagnostic certainty at the end of their long wait. Finally, they thought, they would have a definitive diagnosis, and that diagnosis will finally open the vault to services their child has needed for a very long time. So, the question remains: can we improve this experience for our patients and families? Realistically, obtaining a diagnostic assessment for a child with developmental and behavioral problems is never going to be a “walk in the park.” But can we alleviate some of the confusion and discomfort, maybe prune back some of the hazardous low-hanging branches?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. International classification of diseases, (ICD-10-CM/PCS) transition—background. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm_pcs_background.htmICD-10. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.

  2. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disease, and health (ICF). http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.

  3. Feldman H. Redesigning health care for children with disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes; 2013. p. 70–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lollar D. Launching into adulthood. Baltimore: Brookes; 2010. p. 52, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cuthbert BN. The RDoC framework: facilitating transition from ICD/DSM to dimensional approaches that integrate neuroscience and psychopathology. World Psychiatry. 2014;13(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20087.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Young G. PTSD, endophenotypes, the RDoC, and the DSM-5. Psychol Inj Law. 2014;7(1):75–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9187-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2002. p. 9. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf; adapted by permission.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randall A. Phelps .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Phelps, R.A., Fogler, J.M. (2018). Assessment and Recommendations. In: Fogler, J., Phelps, R. (eds) Trauma, Autism, and Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00503-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics