Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Truth and Political Discourse
  • 1666 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the main topics and foci of this book. It begins with the meaning of post-truth, named the 2016 ‘word of the year’ by the Oxford English Dictionary and an explanation of why this book appears at this point in time, written by this author. The chapter also introduces terms that may be seen as alternatives to post-truth, such as ‘bullshit’, ‘misleadingness’ and ‘agnotology’, although it leaves detailed treatments for Chapter 2. The final half of the chapter is devoted to the type of critical analysis of discourse that appears in Chapters 2 and 3. This approach draws on Fairclough’s notion of semiosis and his interest in the political economic backdrop of discursive activity; Wodak and Reisigl’s Discourse Historical Approach, which focuses heavily on the socio-historical context and the use of topoi as a rhetorical resource; and finally, the key notions of heteroglossia (Bakhtin) and intertextuality (Kristeva).

The original version of this chapter was revised: Post-publication corrections have been incorporated. The correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00497-2_5

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Change history

  • 26 May 2019

    ∎∎∎

References

  • Alim, S. (2006). Roc the mic right: The language of hip hop culture. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, P. (2017). Is the ‘telling case’ a methodological myth? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(5), 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. ([1934–1935] 1981). Discourse in the Novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 269–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, J. (2017). Post-truth: How bullshit conquered the world. London: Biteback.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkhuizen, G. (Ed.). (2017). Reflections on language teacher identity research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. (2016). ‘Post-truth’ declared word of the year by Oxford Dictionaries. BBC News. Accessed December 5, 2016. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-37995600.

  • Block, D. (2006). Multilingual identities in a global city: London stories. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Block, D. (2014). Social class in applied linguistics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, D. (2015). Structure, agency, individualization and the critical realist challenge. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 17–36). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. A. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ancona, M. (2017). The new war on truth and how to fight back. London: Ebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, E. (2017). Post-truth: Why we have reached peak bullshit and what we can do about it. London: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, J., & Wodak, R. (2013). ‘Calculated ambivalence’ and Holocaust denial in Austria. In R. Wodak & J. Richardson (Eds.), Analysing fascist discourse: European fascism in talk and text (pp. 73–96). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1993). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2006). Semiosis, mediation and ideology: A dialectical view. In I. Lassen & J. Strunck (Eds.), Mediating ideology in text and image: Ten critical studies (pp. 129–135). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. (Eds.). (2018a). The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, J., & Richardson, J. (2018b). Introduction. In J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 1–10). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1999). Introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and methods. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C., & Cap, P. (Eds.). (2014a). Contemporary critical discourse studies. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, C., & Cap, P. (2014b). Introduction. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 1–15). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1989). Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries, S. (2017, 22 May 2017/2014). Bullshit is a greater enemy than lies’—Lessons from three new books on the post-truth era. The Guardian. Accessed May 15, 2018 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/may/22/post-truth-era-trump-brexit-lies-books.

  • Keyes, R. (2004). The post-truth era: Dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Hodge, R. (1979). Language as ideology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeva, J. ([1966] 1986). Word, dialogue and novel. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 34–61). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahire, B. (2013). Dans les plis singuliers du social. Paris: Le Decoverte.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (2006). Understanding social theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. ([1859] 1904). A contribution to the critique of political economy. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, J. C. (1984). Typicality and the case study. In R. Ellen (Ed.), Ethnographic research: A guide to general conduct (pp. 237–241). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D., & Choi, J. (Eds.). (2010). Language and culture: Reflective narratives and the emergence of identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OED. (2016). Word of the Year 2016 is... Post Truth. Accessed December 5, 2016. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2016.

  • OED. (2017). Word of the Year 2016 is... Youthquake. Accessed June 12, 2017. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-2017.

  • Orwell, G. ([1949] 2004). Nineteen eighty-four. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. ([1946] 2013). Politics and the English language. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2012). Language and mobility: Unexpected places. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reisigl, M. (2014). Argumentation analysis and the discourse historical approach: A methodological framework. In C. Hart & P. Cap (Eds.), Contemporary critical discourse studies (pp. 67–96). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. (1988). News as discourse. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Elrbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, C. (1997). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2002). Truth and truthfulness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2016a). Methods of critical discourse analysis (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016b). Methods of critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (3rd ed., pp. 1–33). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Block .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Block, D. (2019). Introduction. In: Post-Truth and Political Discourse. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00497-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00497-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00496-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00497-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics