Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Approach for Measuring Sentence Checkability—Preliminary Results

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 385 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 796))

Abstract

Fact-checking has recently become a real world hot topic, especially in what concerns political claims. Several big players, such as, for example, Google or Facebook, have started addressing/making contributions to make “Fact-checking” possible/available to the general public. However, most, if not all Fact-checking platforms are largely manual, in the sense that most of the contributions and of the actual checking is performed by humans. Automatic computational Fact-checking is still very far from being reliable and available on a large scale. In this paper we contribute to the goal of automatic Fact-checking by presenting a fuzzy approach to computing sentence checkability, i.e., to answer the question: “is it possible to know if a sentence is worth to be checked?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hiskey, D. (2010). http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2010/02/the-difference-between-a-fact-and-a-factoid/. Accessed 9 June 2017

  2. FightHoax Homepage. http://fighthoax.com. Accessed 11 June 2017

  3. WikiTribune Homepage. https://www.wikitribune.com. Accessed 11 June 2017

  4. Kosslyn, J., Yu, C. (2017) https://blog.google/products/search/fact-check-now-available-google-search-and-news-around-world/. Accessed 11 June 2017

  5. Politifact Homepage. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/. Accessed 11 June 2017

  6. Hassan, N. et al.: The quest to automate fact-checking. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Computation + Journalism Symposium (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ClaimBuster Demo. http://idir-server2.uta.edu/claimbuster/demo. Accessed 11 June 2017

  8. Hutto, C.J., Gilbert, E.E.: VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. In: Eighth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-14). Ann Arbor, MI, June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pang, B., Lee, L.: A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In: Proceedings of the ACL (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wiktionary. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Shannon_entropy. Accessed 20 May 2017

  11. NLTK Corpus. http://www.nltk.org/howto/corpus.html. Accessed 16 May 2017

  12. Rose, S., Engel, et al.: Automatic keyword extraction from individual documents. In: Berry, M.W., Kogan, J. (eds.) Text Mining: Theory and Applications (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Warner, J.D. et al.: JDWarner/scikit-fuzzy: Scikit-Fuzzy 0.3. Zenodo (2017). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.802397

  14. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H.: Speech and Language Recognition, 3rd edn. draft, Chapter 22 - Semantic Role Labeling (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Collobert, R., et al.: Natural language processing (almost) from scratch. J. Mach. Learn. Res. (JMLR) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ternip—Temporal Expression Recognition and Normalization. https://github.com/cnorthwood/ternip. Accessed 25 May 2017

  17. GeoNames Database. http://www.geonames.org/export/. Accessed 25 May 2017

  18. GooglePlaces. https://developers.google.com/places/web-service. Accessed 25 May 2017

  19. Clark, K., Manning, C.D.: Entity-centric coreference resolution with model stacking. In: Association for Computational Linguistics (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H.: Speech and Language Recognition, 3rd edition draft, Chapter 12 – Syntactic Parsing (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Work supported by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) under reference UID/CEC/50021/2013 and SFRH/BSAB/136312/2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joao P. Carvalho .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Farinha, H., Carvalho, J.P. (2019). A Fuzzy Approach for Measuring Sentence Checkability—Preliminary Results. In: Cornejo, M., Kóczy, L., Medina, J., De Barros Ruano, A. (eds) Trends in Mathematics and Computational Intelligence. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 796. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00485-9_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics