Skip to main content

‘Good Anthropocene’: The Zeitgeist of the 21st Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science ((APESS,volume 26))

Abstract

As we enter into the Anthropocene, the debate around sustainable community systems assume great significance as a response to the current economic, political, cultural and ecological crises. The Anthropocene isn’t just a new geological epoch; it is a crisis of the EARTH SYSTEM with ‘human agency’ at the centre. Hence, it is a very provocative concept. It challenges us to build a ‘New Global Ethos’ for the ‘Good Anthropocene’ – to bend curves in directions that are good for people and the planet, navigating the threats through a new moral practice and changing the course for the future using our unlimited creativity. But this, as the present chapter argues, involves a much deeper philosophical exercise to question, destabilise, and de-centre the ‘human’ in an anthroposised planet, and to work on theoretical innovations based on alternative ontological foundations (against the hegemonic order of ‘the universal rationalist paradigm’) for an era of post-human evolution. As a system of thought, Anthropocene erodes the very philosophical foundation of ‘Modern’ and ‘modernity’, and inspires the social sciences to build upon new ‘forms of cognition’ for a paradigm shift. This chapter argues that such a paradigm shift is already taking place in the Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE) landscape, with a compulsive pressure on us to rethink the ‘anthropos’, rejecting the notion of the homo economicus as the core ontological assumption and creating opportunities for sustainable futures through a new communitarian revolution sprouting up from epistemic ruptures in anthropocentrism, atomism, positivism and the Cartesian dualisms.

Anup Dash, formerly Professor of Sociology, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; Email: dashanup@hotmail.com

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aspers, P., 2011: Markets (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. et al., 1994: Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., 2014: “The Anthropocene: A governance perspective”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 1: 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., 1997: “Le champ economique”, in: Actes de la recherche´ en sciences socials, 119: 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R., 1999: “Interview with Ronald Coase”, in: Newsletter of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, 2: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colander, D. et al., 2009: “Financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic economics” Working Paper 1489, Kiel, Kiel Institute of the World Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, D., 2007: The Soulful Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C., 2012: “Sustainability, neoliberalism, and the moral quality of capitalism”, in: Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 31: 63–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P.J., 2002: “Geology of mankind: the Anthropocene”, in: Nature, 415: 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, P.J.; Schwägerl, C., 2011: “Living in the Anthropocene: Toward a New Global Ethos”, in: Yale Environment 360, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 24 January; at: https://e360.yale.edu/features/living_in_the_anthropocene_toward_a_new_global_ethos (3 January 2019).

  • Crutzen, P.J.; Stroermer, E.F., 2000: “The Anthropocene”, in: IGBP Newsletter, 41(12): 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, A., 2013: “Building smart cooperatives for the 21st century”, in: Roelants, Bruno (Ed.), Cooperative Growth for the 21st Century (Brussels: CICOPA/International Cooperative Alliance).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dash, A., 2016: “An epistemological reflection on social and solidarity economy”, in: Forum for Social Economics, 45(1): 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lima Costa, C. et al., 2017: “On the Posthuman”, in: Ilha do Desterro, 70(2): 9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A., 1990: Green Political Thought: An Introduction (London: Unwin Hyman).

    Google Scholar 

  • England, P., 1993: “The separative self: Androcentric bias in neoclassical assumptions”, in: Ferber, Marianne A.; Nelson, Julie A. (Eds.), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A., 2009: “The economists of tomorrow”, MPRA Paper No. 15691 (Munich Personal RePEc Archive); at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1569/ (16 November 2016).

  • Friedman, M., 1999: “Conversation with Milton Friedman”, in: Snowden, B.; Vane, H. (Eds.), Conversations with Leading Economists: Interpreting Modern Macroeconomics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullbrook, E., (Ed.), 2003: The Crisis in Economics: The Post-autistic Economics Movement–The First 600 Days (London/New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi, M.K., 1909: Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule (Ahmedabad: Navajivan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H., 2000: “Beyond homo economicus: Evidence from experimental economics”, in: Ecological Economics, 5: 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M., 1985: “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”, in: American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D., 2014: “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene: Staying with the Trouble”, Keynote given at the conference on Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet, University of California, Santa Cruz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. et al., 2016: “Anthropologists Are Talking – About The Anthropocene”, in: Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 81, 3: 535–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A.O., 1986: Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G., 1990: “The Rational Choice Theory and Behavioural Psychology”, in: Calhoun, C.; Meyer, M.W.; Scott, W.R. (Eds.), Structures of Power and Constraint. Papers in Honour of Peter M. Blau (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, T.J., 2011: “The coming extinction of homo economicus and the eclipse of the Chicago school of antitrust: Applying evolutionary biology to structural and behavioural antitrust analysis”, in: Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 42: 469–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 1963: On History (New York: Bobbs-Merrill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I., 1990: Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., 2014: “Anthropology at the Time of the Anthropocene. A Personal View of What Is to Be Studied”. Distinguished lecture at the American Anthropologists Association meeting in Washington, December 2014; at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr (18 October 2016).

  • Leff, E., 2009: “Degrowth, or deconstruction of the economy: Towards a sustainable world”, Occasional Paper Series No. 6, in: Contours of Climate Justice, Critical Currents (Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, U., 2005: “Economic epistemology: Hopes and horrors”, in: Episteme, 1: 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malm, A.; Hornborg, A., 2014: “The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 1: 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthaei, J., “Solidarity Economy” page of the Transformation Center web page ; at: http://avery.wellesley.edu/Economics/jmatthaei/transformationcentral/index.shtml (9 November 2016).

  • Mill, J.S., 2004: “Essay V: On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It”, in: Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy (Pennsylvania State University, Electronic Classic Series): 93–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E., 2009: “Solidarity economy: Key concepts and issues”, in: Kawano, E. et al. (Eds.), Solidarity Economy 1: Building alternatives for people and planet (Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.W., 2014a: “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of Our Ecological Crisis” (unpublished), Binghamton University, Fernand Braudel Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.W., 2014b: “The Capitalocene, Part II: Abstract Social Nature and the Limits to Capital” (unpublished), Binghamton University, Fernand Braudel Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.W., 2015: Capitalism in the Web of Life: ECOLOGY AND THE ACCUMULATION OF CAPITAL (New York: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Razeto, L., 1998: “El ‘Factor C’: La Fuerza de la Solidaridad en la Economia. [‘Factor C’: The force of solidarity in the economy’]; at: http://www.luisrazeto.net/content/el-factor-c-la-fuerza-de-la-solidaridad-en-la-economia-envista (December 2016).

  • Rees, M., 2016: “The Anthropocene epoch could inaugurate even more marvellous eras of evolution”, in: The Guardian, 29 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J. et al., 2009: “Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity”, in: Ecology and Society [online], 42(2): 32; at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/ (14 January 2016).

  • Schumpeter, J.A., 1991: The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, Swedberg, Richard (Ed.), (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., 1987: On Ethics and Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seielstad, G.A., 2012: Dawn of the Anthropocene: Humanity’s defining moment (Alexandria, VA: The American Geosciences Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., 1759/1790: Theory of Moral Sentiments (London: A. Miller).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W. et al., 2004: Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure (The IGBP Book Series, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W. et al., 2011: “The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives”, in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369: 842–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W. et al., 2015: “The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 2: 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W.; Crutzen, P.J.; McNeill Jr., 2007: “The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of Nature?” in: Ambio, 36: 614–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M., 1988: “Rationality and revolutionary collective action”, in: Taylor, Michael (Ed.), Rationality and Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R.H., 2000: “From homo economicus to homo sapiens”, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, K., 2012: “Solidarity economy between a focus on the local and a global view”, in: International Journal of Community Currency Research, 16: D-97-105. Theory and Practice (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anup Dash .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dash, A. (2019). ‘Good Anthropocene’: The Zeitgeist of the 21st Century. In: Nayak, A. (eds) Transition Strategies for Sustainable Community Systems. The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00356-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics