Abstract
As we enter into the Anthropocene, the debate around sustainable community systems assume great significance as a response to the current economic, political, cultural and ecological crises. The Anthropocene isn’t just a new geological epoch; it is a crisis of the EARTH SYSTEM with ‘human agency’ at the centre. Hence, it is a very provocative concept. It challenges us to build a ‘New Global Ethos’ for the ‘Good Anthropocene’ – to bend curves in directions that are good for people and the planet, navigating the threats through a new moral practice and changing the course for the future using our unlimited creativity. But this, as the present chapter argues, involves a much deeper philosophical exercise to question, destabilise, and de-centre the ‘human’ in an anthroposised planet, and to work on theoretical innovations based on alternative ontological foundations (against the hegemonic order of ‘the universal rationalist paradigm’) for an era of post-human evolution. As a system of thought, Anthropocene erodes the very philosophical foundation of ‘Modern’ and ‘modernity’, and inspires the social sciences to build upon new ‘forms of cognition’ for a paradigm shift. This chapter argues that such a paradigm shift is already taking place in the Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE) landscape, with a compulsive pressure on us to rethink the ‘anthropos’, rejecting the notion of the homo economicus as the core ontological assumption and creating opportunities for sustainable futures through a new communitarian revolution sprouting up from epistemic ruptures in anthropocentrism, atomism, positivism and the Cartesian dualisms.
Anup Dash, formerly Professor of Sociology, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India; Email: dashanup@hotmail.com
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aspers, P., 2011: Markets (Cambridge: Polity).
Beck, U. et al., 1994: Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Cambridge: Polity).
Biermann, F., 2014: “The Anthropocene: A governance perspective”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 1: 57–61.
Bourdieu, P., 1997: “Le champ economique”, in: Actes de la recherche´ en sciences socials, 119: 48–66.
Coase, R., 1999: “Interview with Ronald Coase”, in: Newsletter of the International Society for New Institutional Economics, 2: 3–10.
Colander, D. et al., 2009: “Financial crisis and the systemic failure of academic economics” Working Paper 1489, Kiel, Kiel Institute of the World Economy.
Coyle, D., 2007: The Soulful Science (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Crouch, C., 2012: “Sustainability, neoliberalism, and the moral quality of capitalism”, in: Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 31: 63–374.
Crutzen, P.J., 2002: “Geology of mankind: the Anthropocene”, in: Nature, 415: 23.
Crutzen, P.J.; Schwägerl, C., 2011: “Living in the Anthropocene: Toward a New Global Ethos”, in: Yale Environment 360, Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, 24 January; at: https://e360.yale.edu/features/living_in_the_anthropocene_toward_a_new_global_ethos (3 January 2019).
Crutzen, P.J.; Stroermer, E.F., 2000: “The Anthropocene”, in: IGBP Newsletter, 41(12): 17–18.
Dash, A., 2013: “Building smart cooperatives for the 21st century”, in: Roelants, Bruno (Ed.), Cooperative Growth for the 21st Century (Brussels: CICOPA/International Cooperative Alliance).
Dash, A., 2016: “An epistemological reflection on social and solidarity economy”, in: Forum for Social Economics, 45(1): 61–87.
de Lima Costa, C. et al., 2017: “On the Posthuman”, in: Ilha do Desterro, 70(2): 9–14.
Dobson, A., 1990: Green Political Thought: An Introduction (London: Unwin Hyman).
England, P., 1993: “The separative self: Androcentric bias in neoclassical assumptions”, in: Ferber, Marianne A.; Nelson, Julie A. (Eds.), Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
Freeman, A., 2009: “The economists of tomorrow”, MPRA Paper No. 15691 (Munich Personal RePEc Archive); at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1569/ (16 November 2016).
Friedman, M., 1999: “Conversation with Milton Friedman”, in: Snowden, B.; Vane, H. (Eds.), Conversations with Leading Economists: Interpreting Modern Macroeconomics (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).
Fullbrook, E., (Ed.), 2003: The Crisis in Economics: The Post-autistic Economics Movement–The First 600 Days (London/New York: Routledge).
Gandhi, M.K., 1909: Hind Swaraj or Indian Home Rule (Ahmedabad: Navajivan).
Gintis, H., 2000: “Beyond homo economicus: Evidence from experimental economics”, in: Ecological Economics, 5: 311–322.
Granovetter, M., 1985: “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness”, in: American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.
Haraway, D., 2014: “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene: Staying with the Trouble”, Keynote given at the conference on Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Haraway, D. et al., 2016: “Anthropologists Are Talking – About The Anthropocene”, in: Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 81, 3: 535–564.
Hirschman, A.O., 1986: Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Homans, G., 1990: “The Rational Choice Theory and Behavioural Psychology”, in: Calhoun, C.; Meyer, M.W.; Scott, W.R. (Eds.), Structures of Power and Constraint. Papers in Honour of Peter M. Blau (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Horton, T.J., 2011: “The coming extinction of homo economicus and the eclipse of the Chicago school of antitrust: Applying evolutionary biology to structural and behavioural antitrust analysis”, in: Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 42: 469–522.
Kant, I., 1963: On History (New York: Bobbs-Merrill).
Kant, I., 1990: Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (London: Macmillan).
Latour, B., 2014: “Anthropology at the Time of the Anthropocene. A Personal View of What Is to Be Studied”. Distinguished lecture at the American Anthropologists Association meeting in Washington, December 2014; at: http://www.bruno-latour.fr (18 October 2016).
Leff, E., 2009: “Degrowth, or deconstruction of the economy: Towards a sustainable world”, Occasional Paper Series No. 6, in: Contours of Climate Justice, Critical Currents (Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation).
Mäki, U., 2005: “Economic epistemology: Hopes and horrors”, in: Episteme, 1: 211–222.
Malm, A.; Hornborg, A., 2014: “The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 1: 62–69.
Matthaei, J., “Solidarity Economy” page of the Transformation Center web page ; at: http://avery.wellesley.edu/Economics/jmatthaei/transformationcentral/index.shtml (9 November 2016).
Mill, J.S., 2004: “Essay V: On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation Proper to It”, in: Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy (Pennsylvania State University, Electronic Classic Series): 93–125.
Miller, E., 2009: “Solidarity economy: Key concepts and issues”, in: Kawano, E. et al. (Eds.), Solidarity Economy 1: Building alternatives for people and planet (Amherst, MA: Center for Popular Economics).
Moore, J.W., 2014a: “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the Nature and Origins of Our Ecological Crisis” (unpublished), Binghamton University, Fernand Braudel Center.
Moore, J.W., 2014b: “The Capitalocene, Part II: Abstract Social Nature and the Limits to Capital” (unpublished), Binghamton University, Fernand Braudel Center.
Moore, J.W., 2015: Capitalism in the Web of Life: ECOLOGY AND THE ACCUMULATION OF CAPITAL (New York: Verso).
Razeto, L., 1998: “El ‘Factor C’: La Fuerza de la Solidaridad en la Economia. [‘Factor C’: The force of solidarity in the economy’]; at: http://www.luisrazeto.net/content/el-factor-c-la-fuerza-de-la-solidaridad-en-la-economia-envista (December 2016).
Rees, M., 2016: “The Anthropocene epoch could inaugurate even more marvellous eras of evolution”, in: The Guardian, 29 August.
Rockström, J. et al., 2009: “Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity”, in: Ecology and Society [online], 42(2): 32; at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/ (14 January 2016).
Schumpeter, J.A., 1991: The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, Swedberg, Richard (Ed.), (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Sen, A., 1987: On Ethics and Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Seielstad, G.A., 2012: Dawn of the Anthropocene: Humanity’s defining moment (Alexandria, VA: The American Geosciences Institute).
Smith, A., 1759/1790: Theory of Moral Sentiments (London: A. Miller).
Steffen, W. et al., 2004: Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure (The IGBP Book Series, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer Verlag).
Steffen, W. et al., 2011: “The Anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives”, in: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369: 842–867.
Steffen, W. et al., 2015: “The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The Great Acceleration”, in: The Anthropocene Review, 2: 81–98.
Steffen, W.; Crutzen, P.J.; McNeill Jr., 2007: “The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of Nature?” in: Ambio, 36: 614–621.
Taylor, M., 1988: “Rationality and revolutionary collective action”, in: Taylor, Michael (Ed.), Rationality and Revolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Thaler, R.H., 2000: “From homo economicus to homo sapiens”, in: Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 133–141.
Volkmann, K., 2012: “Solidarity economy between a focus on the local and a global view”, in: International Journal of Community Currency Research, 16: D-97-105. Theory and Practice (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dash, A. (2019). ‘Good Anthropocene’: The Zeitgeist of the 21st Century. In: Nayak, A. (eds) Transition Strategies for Sustainable Community Systems. The Anthropocene: Politik—Economics—Society—Science, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00356-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00356-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00355-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00356-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)