Advertisement

Interlocking Directorship Networks and Gender: A Bibliometric Analysis

  • Carlo Drago
  • Livia Amidani Aliberti
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Interlocking directorates and gender are both relevant topics in the modern corporate governance debate. Interlocking directorship networks serve different purposes and can have a significant impact on boards, companies and industries. In this context there has been great interest in gender issues relating to interlocking directorship networks fueled by the recent wave of quota regulations across Europe that has pushed up the presence of women on boards. In this paper we provide a bibliometric analysis of the results in literature related to interlocking directorships and gender; in particular we analyse the relevant literature in order to understand its structure using co-citation mechanisms and co-word analysis of the relevant works. It is possible to observe from the existent literature that the topics of interlocking directorship and performance have developed into a relevant and researched area for academics. The results show that it is important to study the structure of the interlocking directorship networks by gender, type of role on boards, presence in board committees, as they impact performance. The main contribution of this work is to assess the existing literature on female networks, interlocking directorship networks and also the effects of different patterns of board diversity on the economic performances of companies.

Keywords

Gender Interlocking directorship Board diversity Bibliometrics Bibliometric analysis Women on board 

References

  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2009), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern, K. R., Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Infometrics, 11(4), 959–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2015). Women on corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the business case for women corporate directors. In R. Burke & M. Mattis (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International challenges and opportunities (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital.Google Scholar
  8. Burt, R. S. (2015). Reinforced structural holes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J, & Simpson. G. W. (2007). The diversity of corporate board committees and financial performance.Google Scholar
  10. Consob. (2018). Rapporto 2017 sulla corporate governance delle società quotate italiane. Online al link: http://www.consob.it/web/areapubblica/rapporto-sulla-corporate-governance .
  11. Consob – La corporate governance delle societa’ quotate italiane. (2017). Report on corporate governance of Italian listed companies 2017. Report presented on February 12, 2018.Google Scholar
  12. De Bakker, F. G., Groenewegen, P., & Den Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of research and theory on corporate social responsibility and corporate social performance. Business and Society, 44(3), 283–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drago, C, Aliberti Amidani, L., & Carbonai, D. (2014). Measuring gender differences in information sharing using network analysis: The case of the Austrian interlocking directorship network in 2009. FEEM Working Paper No. 061.Google Scholar
  14. Drago, C., Millo, F., Ricciuti, R., &Santella, P. (2012). The role of women in the Italian Network of Boards of Directors, 2003–2010. Rivista di Politica Economica, 110(4–6), 161–185 (2012).Google Scholar
  15. Drago, C., Millo, F., Ricciuti, R., & Santella, P. (2015). Corporate governance reforms, interlocking directorship and company performance in Italy. International Review of Law and Economics, 41, 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drago, C., & Ricciuti, R. (2017). Communities detection as a tool to assess a reform of the Italian interlocking directorship network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 466, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Espen Eckboy, B., Nygaardz, K., & Thorburnx, K. S. (2016). How costly is forced gender-balancing of corporate boards?Google Scholar
  18. Ferrari, G., Ferraro, V., Profeta, P., & Pronzato, C.(2016). Gender quotas: Challenging the boards, performance and the stock market. Working Papers 092, Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics (DONDENA), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.Google Scholar
  19. Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. (1999). Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding board of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gamba, M., & Goldstein, A. (2009). The gender dimension of business elites: Italian women directors since 1934. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 14(2), 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1(1983), 201–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hawarden, R. J., & Marsland, S. (2011). Locating women board members in gendered director networks. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(8), 532–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huse, M. (2008). Women directors and the “black box” of board behavior. In S. Vinnicombe, V. Singh, R. Burke, D. Bilimoria, & M. Huse (Eds.), Women on corporate boards: International research and practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Huse, M. (2011). The “Golden Skirts”: Changes in board composition following gender quotas on corporate boards.Google Scholar
  26. Huse, M. (2012), “Golden Skirts” Lessons from Norway about women on corporate board of directors. In S. Grosch & J. Takagi (Eds.), Diversity quotas, diverse perspectives: The case of gender. France: Essec Business School.Google Scholar
  27. Ibarra, E. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. The Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics (IFKAD). (2016). Towards a new architecture of knowledge: Big data, culture and creativity (pp. 1944–1958).Google Scholar
  29. Kim, S. M., & Sherraden, M. (2014). The impact of gender and social networks on microenterprise business performance. The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 41(3), Article 4.Google Scholar
  30. Klyver, K., & Terjesen, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial network composition. Women in Management Review, 22(8), 682–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Konig, T., & Gogel, R. (1981). Interlocking corporate directorships as a social network. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 40(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Le Péchon, G. (2017). Résultats de l’étude annuelle, Composition des Conseils d’ Administration et de Surveillance. Gouvernance & Structures.Google Scholar
  33. Løyning, T. (2011). Kjønnskvotering, kvinner og styrenettverk (Gender quotas, women and control network).Google Scholar
  34. Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2013). A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), 136–169.Google Scholar
  35. McInerney-Lacombe, N., Bilimoria, D., & Salipante, P. (2008). Championing the discussion of tough issues: how women corporate directors contribute to board deliberations. In S. Vinnicombe, V. Singh, R. Burke, D. Bilimoria, & M. Huse (Eds.), Women on corporate boards: International research and practice. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
  36. O’Hagan, S. B. (2017). An exploration of gender, interlocking directorates, and corporate performance. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paoloni, P., Doni, F., & Drago, C. (2016). Gender diversity indicator, corporate environmental and financial performance: Evidence from Europe. In IFKAD 2016 11th International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics Towards a New Architecture of Knowledge: Big Data, Culture and Creativity (pp. 1944–1958).Google Scholar
  38. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  39. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology.Google Scholar
  40. Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Profeta, P., Amidani Aliberti, L., Casarico, A., D’Amico, M., & Puccio, A. (2014). Women directors: The Italian way and beyond. Berlin: Springer, ISBN 1137427485, 9781137427489.Google Scholar
  42. Reberiouxy, A., & Roudautz, G. (2016). Gender quota inside the boardroom: Female directors as new key players?Google Scholar
  43. Santella, P., Drago, C., & Polo, A. (2009). The Italian chamber of lords sits on listed company boards: An empirical analysis of Italian listed company boards from 1998 to 2006.Google Scholar
  44. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization (Vol. 3). California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. Solimene, S., Coluccia, D., & Fontana, S. (2017). Gender diversity on corporate boards: An empirical investigation of Italian listed companies.Google Scholar
  46. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women Directors on Corporate Boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Terjesen, S., Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Do women still lack the “right” kind of human capital for directorships on the FTSE 100 corporate boards. In S. Vinnicombe, V. Singh, R. Burke, D. Bilimoria, & M. Huse (Eds.), Women on corporate boards: International research and practice. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  48. Thiruvadi, S., & Huang, H.-W. (2011). Audit committee gender differences and earnings management. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(7), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Van der Walt, N., & Ingley, C. (2003). Board dynamics and the influence of professional background, gender and ethnic diversity of directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 218–234.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Westphall, J. D., & Milton, L. P. (2000). How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 366–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zenou, E., Allemand, I., & Brullebaut, B. (2012). At the origins of female directors’ networks: A study of the French case. Research in Finance, 28, 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Drago
    • 1
    • 2
  • Livia Amidani Aliberti
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Rome “N. Cusano”RomeItaly
  2. 2.CED—Center for Economic Development & Social ChangeNaplesItaly
  3. 3.LondonUK

Personalised recommendations