Advertisement

Born to Be Alive? Female Entrepreneurship and Innovative Start-Ups

  • Paola DemartiniEmail author
  • Lucia Marchegiani
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Research into gender in management and organizations is constantly and rapidly evolving. Recently, the spur of innovative start-ups has provided unprecedented opportunities for female entrepreneurship as a remedy to gender gap in occupation. Studies on the way female entrepreneurs running an innovative start-up face new business challenges can contribute to understanding the new drivers affecting value creation dynamics in our knowledge-based society. Stemming from the argument that entrepreneurship is a trigger to foster female work, the main research question of this paper is: What are the peculiarities of female entrepreneurship and innovative start-ups? In particular, how do women behave in terms of propensity to innovation, approach to creativity, decision making, networking and co-creation when running innovative start-ups? This paper first relies on a literature review of gender and innovative start-up enterprises. Then, an empirical investigation is developed on a sample of innovative start-ups run by female entrepreneurs included in the Register of Italian Companies. This analysis aims to elucidate objective characteristics related to the business (i.e. sectoral and geographical breakdown). Finally, the quantitative inquiry is complemented with the analysis of soft variables through semi-structured interviews with the aim to gather data on personal characteristics and behaviour of female start-uppers. This paper contributes to expanding the literature on gender studies by supplementing the debate on innovative entrepreneurship and the gender gap. Moreover, it offers a new perspective applied to a topic of high relevance: how women create, process and share knowledge in innovative start-ups, through application and exploitation of novel creative ideas and solutions. The major implication is to advance knowledge and practice in the area of gender in management by focusing upon theoretical developments, practice and current issues as far as innovative start-ups are concerned. Better understanding of the factors that motivate and encourage female entrepreneurs to run an innovative start-up is useful for policymakers, practitioners, and educators. This understanding can help when allocating resources for the purpose of encouraging innovation and when trying to train entrepreneurs to enhance the competitiveness and sustainability of new ventures.

Keywords

Women entrepreneurs Women managers Start-up Innovation Gender studies 

References

  1. Abbasian, S., & Yazdanfar, D. (2015). Gender as a determinant of informal capital in the financing of small firms’ start-ups: Swedish data. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 24(2), 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H., Reese, P. R., & Dubini, P. (1989). Women on the verge of a breakthrough: Networking among entrepreneurs in the United States and Italy. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1(4), 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Autio, E., Yli-Renko, H., & Salonen, A. (1997). International growth of young technology-based firms: A resource-based network model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 5(01), 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BarNir, A. (2012). Starting technologically innovative ventures: Reasons, human capital, and gender. Management Decision, 50(3), 399–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1975). Human capital. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, R. H. (1993). Women organizing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., & Poggio, B. (2014). Gender and entrepreneurship: An ethnographic approach. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brush, C. G. (1992). Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., & Gatewood, E. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cesaroni, F. M., Demartini, P., & Paoloni, P. (2017). Women in business and social media: Implications for female entrepreneurship in emerging countries. African Journal of Business Management, 11(14), 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimov, D. P., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Human capital theory and venture capital firms: Exploring “home runs” and “strike outs”. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gatewood, E. J., Brush, C. G., Carter, N. M., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. (2009). Diana: A symbol of women entrepreneurs’ hunt for knowledge, money, and the rewards of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Henry, C., Foss, L., & Ahl, H. (2016). Gender and entrepreneurship research: A review of methodological approaches. International Small Business Journal, 34(3), 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Italian Ministry of Economic Development. (2016). Relazione annuale al Parlamento sullo stato di attuazione e sull'impatto della policy a sostegno delle startup e delle PMI innovative (Annual report to Parliament on the state of implementation and on the impact of the policy to support startups and innovative SMEs). Website: sviluppoeconomico.gov.it, downloaded on February 2018.
  17. Kaplan, S., & Stromberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 281–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuschel, K., & Lepeley, M. T. (2016). Women start-ups in technology: Literature review and research agenda to improve participation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 27(2–3), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liñán, F., & Fayolle, A. (2015). A systematic literature review on entrepreneurial intentions: Citation, thematic analyses, and research agenda. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(4), 907–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitchell, L. (2011). Overcoming the gender gap: Women entrepreneurs as economic drivers.Google Scholar
  21. Neill, S., Metcalf, L., & York, J. L. (2015). Seeing what others miss: A study of women entrepreneurs in high-growth start-ups. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paoloni, P., & Dumay, J. (2015). The relational capital of micro-enterprises run by women: The startup phase. Vine, 45(2), 172–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Powell, G. N., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2010). Sex, gender, and decisions at the family-work interface. Journal of Management, 36, 1011–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ramadani, V., Gërguri-Rashiti, S., & Fayolle, A. (2015). Female entrepreneurship in transition economies: Trends and challenges. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Utsch, A. (2005). Effects of human capital and long-term human resources development on employment growth of small-scale businesses: A causal analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 681–698.Google Scholar
  26. Register of Companies—Italian Chamber of Commerce. (2018). Website: startup.registroimprese.it, downloaded on February 2018.
  27. Scott, C. E. (1986). Why more women are becoming entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(4), 37–44.Google Scholar
  28. Shah, S. K., Smith, S. W., & Reedy, E. J. (2012). Who are user entrepreneurs? Findings on innovation, founder characteristics, and firm characteristics. Kauffman Firm Survey, Kauffman Foundation.Google Scholar
  29. Shepherd, D. A., Williams, T. A., & Patzelt, H. (2015). Thinking about entrepreneurial decision making: Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1), 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sonfield, M., Lussier, R., Corman, J., & McKinney, M. (2001). Gender comparisons in strategic decision-making: An empirical analysis of the entrepreneurial strategy matrix. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Teijlingen, E. R., & Hundley, V. (2001). The importance of pilot studies. Social Research UPDATE, Dept. of Sociology, University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  32. Wynarczyk, P., & Renner, C. (2006). The “gender gap” in the scientific labour market: The case of science, engineering and technology-based SMEs in the UK. Equal Opportunities International, 25(8), 660–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xie, X., & Lv, J. (2016). Social networks of female tech-entrepreneurs and new venture performance: The moderating effects of entrepreneurial alertness and gender discrimination. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 12(4), 963–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business StudiesRoma Tre UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations