Advertisement

The Presence of Female Directors on Boards. An Empirical Investigation About Its Effects on CSR

  • Daniela ColucciaEmail author
  • Stefano Fontana
  • Silvia Solimene
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

In recent years, in European countries, there has been a growing consensus that gender diversity could improve the economic and social performance of companies. In some countries, the process was supported by the issuing of rules that provided for the mandatory presence of women on boards. Our first aim is to study the level and evolution of the presence of female directors on boards in the biggest European listed companies in the period 2012–2016. Secondly, according to previous literature, we want to verify if the presence of female directors positively affects companies’ CRS disclosure. We have selected for the period 2012–2016 the biggest European listed companies and for each one we verify the presence of women through the ratio between the number of women on the board and the total number of the board. We propose to carry out a descriptive analysis aimed at verifying the evolution of women on company boards, regarding presence and power. Furthermore, we want to test if the presence of female directors has positively affected the companies’ CRS disclosure. We will select the Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) indicator from Bloomberg database as the dependent variable and gender equality measures as explicative variables. Our first contribution is to do a descriptive analysis of the presence and the power of female directors in the sample. We want to provide a picture of the European situation regarding gender equality. The second contribution is to verify if the female directors have positively affected the companies’ CSR disclosure. We contribute to literature by providing a comparison among different European countries, to verify if the female presence has been growing only when forced by law. Secondly, we want to verify if the presence of female directors improves the level of CSR disclosure.

Keywords

Gender Companies’ board Female directors CSR European listed companies 

References

  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 5(2), 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, R. B., & Kirchmaier, T. (2013). From female labor force participation to boardroom gender diversity (Discussion Paper 715). Financial Markets Group, ISSN 0956-8549-715.Google Scholar
  4. Adams, C., Hill, W. Y., & Roberts, C. (1998). Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behavior? British Accounting Review, 30(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahl, H., & Nelson, T. (2015). How policy positions women entrepreneurs: A comparative analysis of state discourse in Sweden and the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al Arussi, A., Selamat, M., & Hanefa, M. (2009). Determinants of financial and environmental disclosures through the internet by Malaysian companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 17(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arfken, D. E., Bellar, S. L., & Helms, M. M. (2004). The ultimate glass ceiling revisited: The presence of women on corporate boards. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(2), 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barako, D. G., & Brown, A. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management and Governance, 12, 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernardi, R. A., Bosco, S. M., & Columb, V. L. (2009). Does female representation on boards of directors associate with the “Most ethical companies” list? Corporate Reputation Review, 12(3), 270–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernardi, R. A., & Threadgill, V. H. (2010). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies, 15(2), 15–21.Google Scholar
  12. Bernardi, R. A., & Vassil, K. M. (2006). Does female representation on boards of directors associate with fortune’s “100 Best companies to work for” list? Business and Society, 45(2), 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Betz, M., O’Connel, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in proclivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 47–61.Google Scholar
  15. Brammer, S., Mellington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2009). Corporate reputation and women on the board. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, K., & Vera, A. M. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 14(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carter, D. A., D’Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organization and Society, 33(4/5), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2003). Environmental reporting management. A European perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(1), 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cormier, S., Magnan, M., & Van Velthoven, B. (2005). Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions? European Accounting Review, 14(1), 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Déjean, F., & Martinez, I. (2009). Environmental disclosure and the cost of equity: The French case. Accounting in Europe, 6(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2012). Women in economic decision-making in the EU: Progress report.Google Scholar
  24. European Parliament. (2012). Gender quotas in management boards. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2012/462429/IPOL-FEMM_NT(2012)462429_EN.pdf.
  25. Farrell, K. A., & Hersch, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1–2), 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz-Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frias-Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez-Ariza, L., & Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. García-Sánchez, I. (2008). Corporate social reporting: Segmentation and characterization of Spanish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(4), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gray, R., Kouhy, R., & Lavers, S. (1995). Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hersby, M. D., Ryan, M. K., & Jetten, J. (2009). Getting together to get ahead: The impact of social structure on women’s working. British Journal of Management, 20(4), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ho, L. C. G., & Taylor, M. E. (2007). An empirical analysis of triple bottom-line reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the United States and Japan. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 18(2), 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kang, E., Ding, D. K., & Charownwong, C. (2010). Investor reaction to women directors. Journal of Business Research, 63(1), 888–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lang, M., & Lundholm, R. (1993). Cross-sectional determinants of analyst ratings of corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 246–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Larrieta-Rubín de Celis, I., Valasco-Balmaseda, E., Fernandez de Bobadilla, S., del Mar, Alonso-Almeida M., & Intxaurburu-Clemente, G. (2015). Does having women managers lead to increased gender equality practices in corporate social responsibility? Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(1), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu, X., & Anbumozhi, V. (2009). Determinant factors of corporate environmental information disclosure: An empirical study of Chinese listed companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 593–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malone, D., Fries, C., & Jones, T. (1993). An empirical investigation of the extent of corporate financial disclosure in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 8(3), 249–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKinsey. (2016). Women matter, reinventing the workplace to unlock the potential of gender diversity.Google Scholar
  39. Monteiro, S., & Aibar-Guzman, B. (2010). Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of big companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 6(4), 404–435.Google Scholar
  40. Mukherjee, K., Sen, M., & Pattanayak, J. K. (2010). Firm characteristics and corporate environmental disclosure practices in India. The IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practice, 9(4), 24–41.Google Scholar
  41. Pande, R., & Ford, D. (2011). Gender quotas and female leadership. World Bank Group, Report 2012. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1322671773271/Pande-Gender-Quotas-April-2011.pdf.
  42. Patten, D. M. (1992). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organization and Society, 17(5), 471–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson, C. A., & Philpot J. (2007). Women’s roles on U.S. fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9164-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reverte, C. (2009). Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shrader, C. B., Blackburn, V., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance: An explanatory study. Journal of Managerial Issue, 9(3), 355–372.Google Scholar
  47. Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly Appointed Directors in newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ. European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2006). Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(7), 569–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stanny, E., & Ely, K. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosures about the effects of climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(6), 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tri Setyorini, C., & Ishak, Z. (2012). Corporate social and environmental disclosure: A positive accounting theory view point. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(9), 152–162.Google Scholar
  51. Zangh, J. Q., Zhu, H., & Ding, H. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes-Oxley Era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Yin, H. T., & Tam, C. M. (2012). Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniela Coluccia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefano Fontana
    • 1
  • Silvia Solimene
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Law and Economics of Productive ActivitiesSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations