Skip to main content

Using Economic Risk to Model Miner Hash Rate Allocation in Cryptocurrencies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Privacy Management, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology (DPM 2018, CBT 2018)

Abstract

Abrupt changes in the miner hash rate applied to a proof-of-work (PoW) blockchain can adversely affect user experience and security. Because different PoW blockchains often share hashing algorithms, miners face a complex choice in deciding how to allocate their hash power among chains. We present an economic model that leverages Modern Portfolio Theory to predict a miner’s allocation over time using price data and inferred risk tolerance. The model matches actual allocations with mean absolute error within 20% for four out of the top five miners active on both Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) blockchains. A model of aggregate allocation across those four miners shows excellent agreement in magnitude with the actual aggregate as well a correlation coefficient of 0.649. The accuracy of the aggregate allocation model is also sufficient to explain major historical changes in inter-block time (IBT) for BCH. Because estimates of miner risk are not time-dependent and our model is otherwise price-driven, we are able to use it to anticipate the effect of a major price shock on hash allocation and IBT in the BCH blockchain. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, we show that, despite mitigation by the new difficulty adjustment algorithm, a price drop of 50% could increase the IBT by 50% for at least a day, with a peak delay of 100%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Data is available from http://traces.cs.umass.edu.

  2. 2.

    https://minethecoin.com.

  3. 3.

    http://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/pow.cpp#L49.

  4. 4.

    http://github.com/bitcoincashorg/bitcoincash.org/blob/master/spec/nov-13-hardfork-spec.md.

  5. 5.

    http://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/consensus/consensus.h#L19,

    http://github.com/BitcoinUnlimited/BitcoinUnlimited/blob/release/src/consensus/consensus.h#L31.

  6. 6.

    Note that miners can conceivably sell their coins to another party before the end of the cooldown period, but because the purchasing party must assume the associated risk, we expect that the transaction price must also take into account the volatility of the coin.

References

  1. ZeusMiner Announces The First Scrypt ASIC Miners To Ship Worldwide, April 2014. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/zeusminer-announces-first-scrypt-asic-070800384.html

  2. Ethash, Aug 3 2017. https://github.com/ethereum/wiki/wiki/Ethash

  3. Hash Rate Tug-Of-War, November 2017. https://blog.slushpool.com/hash-rate-tug-of-war-96d20d482af4

  4. ViaBTC Mining Pool Will Automatically Switch Between BTC and BCH Mining, April 2017. http://nulltx.com/viabtc-mining-pool-will-automatically-switch-between-btc-and-bch-mining

  5. Auto-Profit Switch, June 2018. https://pool.enchanthq.com/article/75/autoprofit-switch

  6. fork.lol, June 2018. http://fork.lol

  7. Mining, February 2018. http://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining

  8. Why aren’t miners switching to BCH? April 2018. http://www.reddit.com/88h8ji

  9. Chiu, J., Koeppl, T.: The Economics of Cryptocurrencies – Bitcoin and Beyond, April 2017. https://www.chapman.edu/research/institutes-and-centers/economic-science-institute/_files/ifree-papers-and-photos/koeppel-april2017.pdf

  10. Cocco, L., Marchesi, M.: Modeling and simulation of the economics of mining in the bitcoin market. PLoS ONE 11(10), e0164603 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dhrymes, Phoebus J.: Portfolio theory: origins, Markowitz and CAPM based selection. In: Guerard, John B. (ed.) Portfolio Construction, Measurement, and Efficiency, pp. 39–48. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33976-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisch, B., Pass, R., Shelat, A.: Socially optimal mining pools. In: Devanur, N.R., Lu, P. (eds.) Web and Internet Economics, pp. 205–218 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finance 7(1), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meshkov, D., Chepurnoy, A., Jansen, M.: Revisiting difficulty control for blockchain systems. In Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Tech., pp. 429–436 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  16. Percival, C.: Stronger key derivation via sequential memory-hard functions. In: The BSD Conference (BSDCan), May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenfeld, M.: Analysis of bitcoin pooled mining reward systems, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  18. Song, J.: Bitcoin Cash Difficulty Adjustments, August 2017. http://medium.com/@jimmysong/bitcoin-cash-difficulty-adjustments-2ec589099a8e

  19. Wilmoth, J.: Bitcoin ABC proposes november hard fork to stabilize bitcoin cash mining difficulty, October 2017. https://www.ccn.com/bitcoin-abc-proposes-hard-fork-to-stabilize-bitcoin-cash-mining-difficulty

  20. Wood, A.: Bitmain Releases Ethash ASIC Miners, April 2018. http://cointelegraph.com/news/bitmain-releases-ethash-asic-miners

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Bissias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bissias, G., Levine, B.N., Thibodeau, D. (2018). Using Economic Risk to Model Miner Hash Rate Allocation in Cryptocurrencies. In: Garcia-Alfaro, J., Herrera-Joancomartí, J., Livraga, G., Rios, R. (eds) Data Privacy Management, Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain Technology. DPM CBT 2018 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11025. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00305-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00305-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00304-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00305-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics