Abstract
This chapter extends and further develops a recent paper by two of the authors, Sanders and Hohenstein, by both drawing in a curatorial perspective (Meehitiya) and examining how taxidermy display techniques impact on their potential for learning conversations about death. Our belief that taxidermic displays represent potential research spaces for understanding the impact of family communication on children’s understandings of life and death underscores a guided reflection on the merits of such displays for demonstrating ways in which families discuss concepts of life, and death. Furthermore, we maintain that such studies might facilitate new interdisciplinary relationships between museum curators and researchers, thus contributing to wider debate on the place of natural history collections in modern society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alberti, S. J. M. M. (2005). Objects and the museum. Isis, 96, 559–571.
Alberti, S. J. M. M. (2008). Constructing nature behind glass. Museum and Society, 9(2), 73–97.
Andrews, E. (2012). Reflexive displays: Interpreting taxidermy practice. NatSCA News, 23, 59–63.
Ash, D. (2004). How families use questions at dioramas: Ideas for exhibit design. Curator, 47(1), 84–100.
Baker, S. (2014). Dead, dead, dead, dead, dead. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human-animal studies. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Barrett, H. C., & Behne, T. (2005). Children’s understanding of death as the cessation of agency: A test using sleep versus death. Cognition, 96, 93–108.
Bencard, A. (2014). Presence in the museum: On metonymies, discontinuity and history without stories. Museum and Society, 12(1), 29–43.
Bradley, R. D., Bradley, L. C., Garner, H. J., & Baker, R. J. (2014). Assessing the value of natural history collections and addressing issues regarding long-term growth and care. Bioscience, 64(12), 1150–1158.
Bunce, L. (2016). Appreciation of authenticity promotes curiosity: Implications for object-based learning in museums. Journal of Museum Education, 41(3), 230–239.
Burt, J. (2008). The aesthetics of livingness. Antennae, 5(Spring), 4–12.
Cook, J. A., Edwards, S. V., Lacey, E. A., Guralnick, R. P., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Welch, C. K., Bell, K. C., Galbreath, K. E., Himes, C., Allen, J. M., Heath, T. A., Carnaval, A. C., Cooper, K. L., Liu, M., Hanken, J., & Ickert-Bond, S. (2014). Natural history collections as emerging resources for innovative education. Bioscience, 64(8), 725–734.
Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333–356). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Tenenbaum, H., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12, 258–261.
Elwick, A. (2015). Understanding implicit learning in museums and galleries. Museum and Society, 13(4), 420–430.
Fawcett, L. (2014). Kinship imaginaries: Children’s stories of wild friendships, fear and freedom. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human-animal studies. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Fender, J., & Crowley, K. (2007). How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 189–210.
Gregory, H., & Purdy, A. (2015). Present signs, dead things: Indexical authenticity and Taxidermy’s nonabsent animal. Configurations, 23(1), 61–92.
Gutierrez, I., Miller, P., Rosengren, K., & Schein, S. (2014). Affective dimensions of death: Children’s books, questions and understandings. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79, 43–61.
Hohenstein, J., Callanan, M., & Ash, D. (2015). Exploring the links between adult-child conversations and children’s ideas about science. Unpublished manuscript, Hunter, S.B.
Hunter, S. B., & Smith, D. E. (2008). Predictors of children’s understandings of death: Age, cognitive ability, death experience and maternal communicative competence. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 57(2), 143–162.
Jaakkola, R. O., & Slaughter, V. (2002). Children’s body knowledge: Understanding ‘life’ as a biological goal. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 325–342.
Kirk, E. (2013). Gaining young children’s perspectives on natural history collections. Journal of Natural Science Collections, 1, 38–43.
McGhie, H. (2015a). Using taxidermied animals to support the National Curriculum for English, History, Art and Design at KS1-4. https://naturemanchester.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/advocacy-toolkit-4-using-taxidermy-to-support-the-national-curriculum-for-english-history-art-and-design.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2016.
McGhie, H. (2015b). Using taxidermied animals to support the National Curriculum for Science, KS1-4. https://naturemanchester.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/advocacy-toolkit-5-using-taxidermy-to-support-the-national-curriculum-for-science.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2016.
Morris, P. (2010). A history of taxidermy: Art, science and bad taste (1st ed.). Ascot: MPM Publishing.
Patchett, M., & Foster, K. (2008). Repair work: Surfacing the geographies of dead animals. Museum and Society, 6(2), 98–122.
Pederson, H. (2007). The school and the animal other: An ethnography of human-animal relations in education. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Poliquin, R. (2008). The matter and meaning of museum taxidermy. Museum and Society, 6(2), 123–134.
Poliquin, R. (2012). The breathless zoo: Taxidermy and the cultures of longing. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Reiss, M. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Diorama as depictions of reality and opportunities for learning in biology. Curator: The Museum Journal, 54(4), 447–459.
Robin, L. (2009). Dead museum animals: Natural order or cultural Chaos? reCollections, 42, 1–14.
Rocha, L. A., Aleixo, A., Allen, G., Almeda, F., Baldwin, C. C., Barclay, M. V. L., Bates, J. M., Bauer, A. M., Benzoni, F., Berns, C. M., Berumen, M. L., Blackburn, D. C., Blum, S., Bolanos, F., Bowie, R. C. K., Britz, R., Brown, R. M., Cadena, C. D., Carpenter, K., Ceriaco, L. M., Chakrabarty, P., Chaves, G., Choat, J. H., Clements, K. D., Collette, B. B., Collins, A., Coyne, J., Cracraft, J., Daniel, T., de Carvalho, M. R., de Queiroz, K., Di Dario, F., Drewes, R., Dumbacher, J. P., Engilis, A., Erdmann, M. V., Eschmeyer, W., Feldman, C. R., Fisher, B. L., Fjeldsa, J., Fritsch, P. W., Fuchs, J., Getahun, A., Gill, A., Gomon, M., Gosliner, T., Graves, G. R., Griswold, C. E., Guralnick, R., Hartel, K., Helgen, K. M., Ho, H., Iskandar, D. T., Iwamoto, T., Jaafar, Z., James, H. F., Johnson, D., Kavanaugh, D., Knowlton, N., Lacey, E., Larson, H. K., Last, P., Leis, J. M., Lessios, H., Liebherr, J., Lowman, M., Mahler, D. L., Mamonekene, V., Matsuura, K., Mayer, G. C., Mays, H., McCosker, J., McDiarmid, R. W., McGuire, J., Miller, M. J., Mooi, R., Mooi, R. D., Moritz, C., Myers, P., Nachman, M. W., Nussbaum, R. A., Foighil, D. O., Parenti, L. R., Parham, J. F., Paul, E., Paulay, G., Perez-Eman, J., Perez-Matus, A., Poe, S., Pogonoski, J., Rabosky, D. L., Randall, J. E., Reimer, J. D., Robertson, D. R., Rodel, M.-O., Rodrigues, M. T., Roopnarine, P., Ruber, L., Ryan, M. J., Sheldon, F., Shinohara, G., Short, A., Simison, W. B., Smith-Vaniz, W. F., Springer, V. G., Stiassny, M., Tello, J. G., Thompson, C. W., Trnski, T., Tucker, P., Valqui, T., Vecchione, M., Verheyen, E., Wainwright, P. C., Wheeler, T. A., White, W. T., Will, K., Williams, J. T., Williams, G., Wilson, E. O., Winker, K., Winterbottom, R., & Witt, C. C. (2014). Specimen collection: An essential tool. Science, 344(6186), 814–815.
Rosengren, K., Gutierrez, I., & Schein, S. (2014). Cognitive dimensions of death in context. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79, 62–82.
Rosengren, K. S., Miller, P. J., Gutiérrez, I. T., Chow, P., Schein, S., & Anderson, K. A. (2014). Children’s understanding of death: Toward a contextual perspective. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79, 1–162.
Sanders, D., & Hohenstein, J. (2015). “Death on display.” Reflections on taxidermy and children’s understanding of life and death. Curator: The Museums Journal., 58(3), 251–262.
Schonmann, S. (2006). Theatre as a medium for children and young people: Images and observations. Dordrecht: Springer.
Smith, D. E. (2008). Predictors of children’s understandings of death: Age, cognitive ability, death experience and maternal communicative competence. OMEGA, 57(2), 143–162.
Valle, A., & Callanan, M. (2006). Similarity comparisons and relational analogies in parent-child conversations about science topics. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 96–124. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0009.
Wellcome Collection. (2012). Death: A picture album. London: The Wellcome Trust.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meehitiya, L., Sanders, D., Hohenstein, J. (2019). Life, Living and Lifelessness in Taxidermy. In: Scheersoi, A., Tunnicliffe, S. (eds) Natural History Dioramas – Traditional Exhibits for Current Educational Themes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00208-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00208-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00207-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00208-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)