Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter extends and further develops a recent paper by two of the authors, Sanders and Hohenstein, by both drawing in a curatorial perspective (Meehitiya) and examining how taxidermy display techniques impact on their potential for learning conversations about death. Our belief that taxidermic displays represent potential research spaces for understanding the impact of family communication on children’s understandings of life and death underscores a guided reflection on the merits of such displays for demonstrating ways in which families discuss concepts of life, and death. Furthermore, we maintain that such studies might facilitate new interdisciplinary relationships between museum curators and researchers, thus contributing to wider debate on the place of natural history collections in modern society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberti, S. J. M. M. (2005). Objects and the museum. Isis, 96, 559–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti, S. J. M. M. (2008). Constructing nature behind glass. Museum and Society, 9(2), 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, E. (2012). Reflexive displays: Interpreting taxidermy practice. NatSCA News, 23, 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, D. (2004). How families use questions at dioramas: Ideas for exhibit design. Curator, 47(1), 84–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, S. (2014). Dead, dead, dead, dead, dead. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human-animal studies. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H. C., & Behne, T. (2005). Children’s understanding of death as the cessation of agency: A test using sleep versus death. Cognition, 96, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencard, A. (2014). Presence in the museum: On metonymies, discontinuity and history without stories. Museum and Society, 12(1), 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R. D., Bradley, L. C., Garner, H. J., & Baker, R. J. (2014). Assessing the value of natural history collections and addressing issues regarding long-term growth and care. Bioscience, 64(12), 1150–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, L. (2016). Appreciation of authenticity promotes curiosity: Implications for object-based learning in museums. Journal of Museum Education, 41(3), 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, J. (2008). The aesthetics of livingness. Antennae, 5(Spring), 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. A., Edwards, S. V., Lacey, E. A., Guralnick, R. P., Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Welch, C. K., Bell, K. C., Galbreath, K. E., Himes, C., Allen, J. M., Heath, T. A., Carnaval, A. C., Cooper, K. L., Liu, M., Hanken, J., & Ickert-Bond, S. (2014). Natural history collections as emerging resources for innovative education. Bioscience, 64(8), 725–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., & Jacobs, M. (2002). Building islands of expertise in everyday family activity. In G. Leinhardt, K. Crowley, & K. Knutson (Eds.), Learning conversations in museums (pp. 333–356). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, K., Callanan, M., Tenenbaum, H., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12, 258–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwick, A. (2015). Understanding implicit learning in museums and galleries. Museum and Society, 13(4), 420–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2014). Kinship imaginaries: Children’s stories of wild friendships, fear and freedom. In G. Marvin & S. McHugh (Eds.), Routledge handbook of human-animal studies. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fender, J., & Crowley, K. (2007). How parent explanation changes what children learn from everyday scientific thinking. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, H., & Purdy, A. (2015). Present signs, dead things: Indexical authenticity and Taxidermy’s nonabsent animal. Configurations, 23(1), 61–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, I., Miller, P., Rosengren, K., & Schein, S. (2014). Affective dimensions of death: Children’s books, questions and understandings. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79, 43–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohenstein, J., Callanan, M., & Ash, D. (2015). Exploring the links between adult-child conversations and children’s ideas about science. Unpublished manuscript, Hunter, S.B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. B., & Smith, D. E. (2008). Predictors of children’s understandings of death: Age, cognitive ability, death experience and maternal communicative competence. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 57(2), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, R. O., & Slaughter, V. (2002). Children’s body knowledge: Understanding ‘life’ as a biological goal. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, E. (2013). Gaining young children’s perspectives on natural history collections. Journal of Natural Science Collections, 1, 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhie, H. (2015a). Using taxidermied animals to support the National Curriculum for English, History, Art and Design at KS1-4. https://naturemanchester.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/advocacy-toolkit-4-using-taxidermy-to-support-the-national-curriculum-for-english-history-art-and-design.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2016.

  • McGhie, H. (2015b). Using taxidermied animals to support the National Curriculum for Science, KS1-4. https://naturemanchester.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/advocacy-toolkit-5-using-taxidermy-to-support-the-national-curriculum-for-science.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2016.

  • Morris, P. (2010). A history of taxidermy: Art, science and bad taste (1st ed.). Ascot: MPM Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patchett, M., & Foster, K. (2008). Repair work: Surfacing the geographies of dead animals. Museum and Society, 6(2), 98–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pederson, H. (2007). The school and the animal other: An ethnography of human-animal relations in education. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poliquin, R. (2008). The matter and meaning of museum taxidermy. Museum and Society, 6(2), 123–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poliquin, R. (2012). The breathless zoo: Taxidermy and the cultures of longing. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Diorama as depictions of reality and opportunities for learning in biology. Curator: The Museum Journal, 54(4), 447–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, L. (2009). Dead museum animals: Natural order or cultural Chaos? reCollections, 42, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, L. A., Aleixo, A., Allen, G., Almeda, F., Baldwin, C. C., Barclay, M. V. L., Bates, J. M., Bauer, A. M., Benzoni, F., Berns, C. M., Berumen, M. L., Blackburn, D. C., Blum, S., Bolanos, F., Bowie, R. C. K., Britz, R., Brown, R. M., Cadena, C. D., Carpenter, K., Ceriaco, L. M., Chakrabarty, P., Chaves, G., Choat, J. H., Clements, K. D., Collette, B. B., Collins, A., Coyne, J., Cracraft, J., Daniel, T., de Carvalho, M. R., de Queiroz, K., Di Dario, F., Drewes, R., Dumbacher, J. P., Engilis, A., Erdmann, M. V., Eschmeyer, W., Feldman, C. R., Fisher, B. L., Fjeldsa, J., Fritsch, P. W., Fuchs, J., Getahun, A., Gill, A., Gomon, M., Gosliner, T., Graves, G. R., Griswold, C. E., Guralnick, R., Hartel, K., Helgen, K. M., Ho, H., Iskandar, D. T., Iwamoto, T., Jaafar, Z., James, H. F., Johnson, D., Kavanaugh, D., Knowlton, N., Lacey, E., Larson, H. K., Last, P., Leis, J. M., Lessios, H., Liebherr, J., Lowman, M., Mahler, D. L., Mamonekene, V., Matsuura, K., Mayer, G. C., Mays, H., McCosker, J., McDiarmid, R. W., McGuire, J., Miller, M. J., Mooi, R., Mooi, R. D., Moritz, C., Myers, P., Nachman, M. W., Nussbaum, R. A., Foighil, D. O., Parenti, L. R., Parham, J. F., Paul, E., Paulay, G., Perez-Eman, J., Perez-Matus, A., Poe, S., Pogonoski, J., Rabosky, D. L., Randall, J. E., Reimer, J. D., Robertson, D. R., Rodel, M.-O., Rodrigues, M. T., Roopnarine, P., Ruber, L., Ryan, M. J., Sheldon, F., Shinohara, G., Short, A., Simison, W. B., Smith-Vaniz, W. F., Springer, V. G., Stiassny, M., Tello, J. G., Thompson, C. W., Trnski, T., Tucker, P., Valqui, T., Vecchione, M., Verheyen, E., Wainwright, P. C., Wheeler, T. A., White, W. T., Will, K., Williams, J. T., Williams, G., Wilson, E. O., Winker, K., Winterbottom, R., & Witt, C. C. (2014). Specimen collection: An essential tool. Science, 344(6186), 814–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, K., Gutierrez, I., & Schein, S. (2014). Cognitive dimensions of death in context. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79, 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren, K. S., Miller, P. J., Gutiérrez, I. T., Chow, P., Schein, S., & Anderson, K. A. (2014). Children’s understanding of death: Toward a contextual perspective. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 79, 1–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, D., & Hohenstein, J. (2015). “Death on display.” Reflections on taxidermy and children’s understanding of life and death. Curator: The Museums Journal., 58(3), 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonmann, S. (2006). Theatre as a medium for children and young people: Images and observations. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (2008). Predictors of children’s understandings of death: Age, cognitive ability, death experience and maternal communicative competence. OMEGA, 57(2), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valle, A., & Callanan, M. (2006). Similarity comparisons and relational analogies in parent-child conversations about science topics. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 96–124. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2006.0009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellcome Collection. (2012). Death: A picture album. London: The Wellcome Trust.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luanne Meehitiya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meehitiya, L., Sanders, D., Hohenstein, J. (2019). Life, Living and Lifelessness in Taxidermy. In: Scheersoi, A., Tunnicliffe, S. (eds) Natural History Dioramas – Traditional Exhibits for Current Educational Themes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00208-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00208-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00207-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00208-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics