Abstract
The chapter problematizes how a neoliberal ideology organizes Environmental and Sustainability Education (ESE) and the figuration of the eco-certified child. The chapter illuminates how the individual choice is elevated in the sustainability discourse, and how individuals become accountable for solving global problems. The focus of individual choices is understood from Foucault’s theories on pastoral power: how ESE operates through describing humankind as in need of salvation. This is done through pointing out the individual as responsible for not only oneself, but also the “flock.” As well, the use of numbers is problematized: how tables, footprints, and numerical comparisons make different ways of handling sustainability problems possible respectively impossible. The chapter ends with emphasizing the need for politicizing the individualism in ESE.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This discussion continues in the chapter “Natural —With No Artificial Additives.”
- 2.
A large proportion of Eon’s energy comes from hydroelectric power , which is not fossil fuel and thus does not have the same greenhouse effect as fuels like oil and coal.
- 3.
Cf. also Bernstein (2001, p. 365).
- 4.
These particular figures come from the PISA test in mathematics for 2012.
- 5.
- 6.
I must remind readers that this is a text-based study. Soneryd and Uggla (2015) problematize the way in which this obvious steering toward consumption as the important political action really gets people to comply, or if the idea of green citizenship is renegotiated in practice.
- 7.
- 8.
I have searched without success for teaching material on both the Swedish Greenpeace website (http://www.greenpeace.org/sweden/se) and the international site (http://www.greenpeace.org).
- 9.
The title of the Greenpeace film is “LEGO : Everything is NOT awesome,” alluding to the song “Everything is Awesome” from The LEGO Movie from 2014. The characters of Emmet and Lucy from the original film can also be glimpsed in the Greenpeace film.
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139.
Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2014a). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ahmed, S. (2014b). The politics of good feeling. Critical Race and Whiteness Studies, 10(2), 1–19.
Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Brooklyn: Verso Books.
Andrée, M., Hansson, L., & Ideland, M. (2018). Political agendas and actors in science teaching: An analysis of teaching materials from NGOs and private companies. In A. Arvola-Orlander, K. Othrell-Cass, & M. K. Sillasen (Eds.), Cultural, social, and political perspectives in science education (pp. 75–92). Cham: Springer.
Bengtsson, S., & Östman, L. (2013). Globalisation and education for sustainable development: Emancipation from context and meaning. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 477–498.
Bennett, J. (2001). The enchantment of modern life: Attachments, crossings, and ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bernstein, B. (2001). From pedagogies to knowledge. In A. Morals, I. Neves, B. Davies, & H. Daniels (Eds.), Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research. New York: Peter Lang.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In I. Szeman & T. Kaposy (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthology (pp. 81–93). Chichester: Blackwell.
Bowden, R. (2005). Hållbar utveckling: Hotet mot miljön. Stockholm: Liber.
Cachelin, A., Rose, J., & Paisley, K. (2015). Disrupting neoliberal discourse in critical sustainability education: A qualitative analysis of intentional language framing. Environmental Education Research, 21(8), 1127–1142.
Child, L. (2008). Hjälp vår jord. Stockholm: Rabén & Sjögren.
Cooke, A. N., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Environmentally active people: The role of autonomy, relatedness, competence and self-determined motivation. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 631–657.
Cowen, R. (2014). With the exception of Switzerland … thoughts about the nation and educational research. IJHE Bildungsgeschichte 4(2), 216–228.
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M., Ewald, F., & Fontana, A. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979 (M. Senellart, Ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gore, A. (2006). An inconvenient truth. Paramount Pictures.
Gorur, R. (2014). Towards a sociology of measurement in education policy. European Educational Research Journal, 13(1), 58–72.
Gottlieb, D., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Haim, A. (2013). Encouraging ecological behaviors among students by using the ecological footprint as an educational tool: A quasi-experimental design in a public high school in the city of Haifa. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 844–863.
Greenpeace. (2014). LEGO: Everything is NOT awesome. Retrieved April 7, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhbliUq0_r4.
Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hasslöf, H. (2015). The educational challenge in “education for sustainable development”: Qualification, social change and the political. Malmö: Malmö University. Diss.
Hertzberg, F. (2015). Double gestures of inclusion and exclusion: Notions of learning outcomes, autonomy, and informed choices in Swedish educational and vocational guidance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28(10), 1203–1228.
Heyck, H. (2012). Producing reason. In M. Solovey & H. Cravens (Eds.), Cold war social science: Knowledge production, liberal democracy, and human nature (pp. 99–116). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hillbur, P., Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2016). Response and responsibility: Fabrication of the eco-certified citizen in Swedish curricula 1962–2011. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(3), 409–426.
Holmberg, T., & Ideland, M. (2016). Imagination laboratory: Making sense of bio-objects in contemporary genetic art. Sociological Review, 64(3), 447–467.
Höhler, S. (2015). Spaceship earth in the environmental age, 1960–1990. London: Pickering & Chatto.
Hursh, D., Henderson, J., & Greenwood, D. (2015). Environmental education in a neoliberal climate. Environmental Education Research, 21(3), 299–318.
Ideland, M. (2014). How PISA becomes transformed into a Nationalistic Project: Reflections upon a Swedish ‘school crisis’. IJHE Bildungsgeschichte, 4(2), 243–245.
Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2015). Governing ‘eco-certified children’ through pastoral power: Critical perspectives on education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 21(2), 173–182.
Kampmann, J. (2004a). Det selv-i-agt-tagelige barn. Psyke & Logos, 25(2), 21.
Kampmann, J. (2004b). Societalization of childhood: New opportunities? New demands? In H. Brembeck, B. Johansson, & J. Kampmann (Eds.), Beyond the competent child: Exploring contemporary childhoods in the Nordic welfare societies (pp. 127–152). Fredriksberg: Roskilde University Press.
Klein, N. (2015). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Knutsson, B. (2013). Swedish environmental and sustainability education research in the era of post-politics? Utbildning & Demokrati 22(2), 105–122.
Kopnina, H. (2012). Education for sustainable development (ESD): The turn away from ‘environment’in environmental education? Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 699–717.
Lazzarato, M. (2010). Pastoral power: Beyond public and private. Open, 19, 18–32.
Lin, S. M. (2016). Reducing students’ carbon footprints using personal carbon footprint management system based on environmental behavioural theory and persuasive technology. Environmental Education Research, 22(5), 658–682.
McKenzie, M. (2012). Education for y’all: Global neoliberalism and the case for a politics of scale in sustainability education policy. Policy Futures in Education, 10(2), 165–177.
Miller, P. (2004). Governing by numbers: Why calculative practices matter. In A. Amin & N. Thrift (Eds.), The Blackwell cultural economy reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mouffe, C. (2011). On the political. Abingdon: Routledge.
Persson, M., Sjöström, B., & Johnsson, P. (2007). Klimatsmart: Din guide till en miljövänligare vardag. Stockholm: Alfabeta.
Popkewitz, T. (2011). PISA. In M. A. Pereyra, H. G. Kotthoff, & R. Cowen (Eds.), PISA under examination: Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. London: Routledge.
Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–692.
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N., & Miller, P. (2010). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 61, 271–303.
Sellar, S. (2015). A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy. Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), 131–146.
Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). The governmentalization of learning and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. Educational Theory, 58(4), 391–415.
Soneryd, L., & Uggla, Y. (2015). Green governmentality and responsibilization: New forms of governance and responses to ‘consumer responsibility’. Environmental Politics, 24(6), 913–931.
Sund, l., & Öhman, J. (2014). On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the postpolitical consensus. Environmental Education Research, 20, 639–659.
Svenskt näringsliv. (2010). Miljö – så funkar det. Stockholm: Svenskt näringsliv.
Typhina, E. (2017). Urban park design + love for nature: Interventions for visitor experiences and social networking. Environmental Education Research, 23(8), 1169–1181.
Van Poeck, K., Goeminne, G., & Vandenabeele, J. (2016). Revisiting the democratic paradox of environmental and sustainability education: Sustainability issues as matters of concern. Environmental Education Research, 22(6), 806–826.
Van Poeck, K., & Östman, L. (2017). Creating space for ‘the political’ in environmental and sustainability education practice: A political move analysis of educators’ actions. Environmental Education Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1306835.
Weber, M. (2009). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Abingdon: Routledge.
Witoszek, N. (2018). Teaching sustainability in Norway, China and Ghana: Challenges to the UN programme. Environmental Education Research, 24(6), 831–844.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ideland, M. (2019). Free-Range Children. In: The Eco-Certified Child. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00199-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00199-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00198-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00199-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)