Abstract
This chapter will explore beginning teachers’ views of the use of dioramas to teach young children about scientists who have contributed to our understandings about Natural History. Recent changes to the English National Curriculum have resulted in re-focusing learners to consider not only what do we know about an area of science today, but also, how did we come to know (and whom was responsible) for discovering theories we learn about in school. Hypotheses (and evidence) that enabled scientists to recognise the process of survival of the fittest; the ways that fossils representative of different geological eras have helped us consider (and understand) why the form and function of plants and animals has changed over time and how pollutants, too, have caused changes in survival rates of particular animals are all contributory to appreciating Natural History. The scientific work that people, such as David Attenborough, Charles Darwin, Mary Anning, Rachel Carson and Jane Goodall have carried out will be considered through the ways that learners could use dioramas to convey aspects of their ‘stories’. Constructing dioramas can help beginning teachers appreciate how a more concrete, direct, ‘hands-on’ approach using everyday materials, can offer affordance to make complex ideas easier for younger children to understand. This chapter also describes, what they, as beginning teachers, reflected on through making a series of dioramas to depict the ways that the different scientists have contributed to our understanding of Natural History in some way. They also considered how it was a useful approach for young children, not only to make the dioramas, but also review each others’ and create a class collection of ‘models’ to help understand what we know (and how) about Natural History. This chapter, therefore, is written about a piece of evaluative action research undertaken to explore what beginning teachers learn (and think) about the use of dioramas to help children understand natural history.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achiam, M., May, M., & Marandino, M. (2014). Affordances and distributed cognition in museum exhibitions. Museum Management and curatorship, 29(5), 461–481.
Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museums exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education Supplement, 88, S17–S33.
Arbor, A. (2011). Small stories for learning: A sociocultural analysis of children’s participation in informal science education. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, New York
Ash, D. (2004). How families use questions at dioramas: Ideas for exhibit design. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47(1), 84–100.
Chu, E. (2014). DIY Dioramas. Popular Photography, 78(9), 42–43.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Jakobsson, A. & Davidson, E. (Eds.). (2009). Understanding interactions at science Centers and museums. Approaching sociocultural perspectives. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Department for Education. (2013). National curriculum: Primary national curriculum. London: Department for Education.
Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
Falk, J. H., Scott, C., & Dierking, L. D. (2004). Interactives and visitor learning. Curator, 47(2), 171–198.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2007). Museums and education. Purposes, pedagogy performance. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.
Piqueras, J., Wickman, P.-O., & Hamza, K. M. (2012). Student teachers’ moment-to-moment reasoning and the development of discursive themes – an analysis of practical epistemologies in a natural history museum exhibit. In E. Davidson & A. Jakobsson (Eds.), Understanding interactions at science centers and museums. Approaching sociocultural perspectives (pp. 79–96). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Reiss, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). Dioramas as depictions of reality and opportunities for learning in biology. Curator The Museum Journal, 54(4), 447–459.
Rennie, L. J. (2014). Learning science outside of school. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 120–144). New York: Routledge.
Rounds, J. (2004). Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator, 47(4), 389–412.
Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). The role of natural history dioramas in science education. The Informal Learning Review, 87, 11–19.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Scheersoi, A. (2010). Natural history dioramas. Dusty relics or tools for biology learning. In A. Filippoupoliti (Ed.), Science exhibitions: Communication and evaluation (pp. 186–217). Edinburgh: Museum ETC.
Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Scheersoi, A. (2015). Natural history dioramas. History, construction and educational role. Dordrecht: Springer.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGregor, D., Gadd, J. (2019). Constructing and Reviewing Dioramas: Supporting Beginning Teachers to Think About Their Use to Help Children Understand the Work of Natural History Scientists. In: Scheersoi, A., Tunnicliffe, S. (eds) Natural History Dioramas – Traditional Exhibits for Current Educational Themes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00175-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00175-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00174-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00175-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)