Abstract
This paper describes the implementation of the goal-function tree (GFT) for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in a Systems Modeling Language (SysML) environment which tracks nominal and off-nominal goals for a successful flight for a UAV. The utility of the GFT allows for traceability of the system’s goals and requirements to perform a successful mission scenario. Definition of nominal goals reduces ambiguity about mission success and can be followed more easily by the customer. Furthermore, the goal-function tree can also track and implement corrections if the measurements for success are deviating through the use of off-nominal functions. The GFT’s off-nominal functions create a new set of functions and goals which attempt to mitigate a failing attribute instead of the other methods which only defined failure. This methodology creates a set of procedures for an operator or system when action is needed, thereby identifying more robust requirements as compared to traditional requirements development based only on nominal mission scenarios. The advantage of the SysML environment allows the legible traceability of the overlapping of goals of various structural and behavioral system objects, the execution of functions, and implementation of stereotypes which classifies the interactions between objects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Johnson, S. (2011). System health management: With aerospace applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sage, A. (2016). Systems engineering: Analysis, design, and development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Sussman, G. J. (2007). Building robust systems an essay. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Thomas, D. (2007). Selected systems engineering process deficiencies and their consequences. Acta Astronautica, 61(1–6), 406–415.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (1999). Mars climate orbiter mishap investigation board phase I report. Washington, DC: NASA.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2013). Space launch system program (SLSP) integrated mission and fault management (M&FM) design analysis and performance assessment volume 2: SLS goal tree/success tree (GT/ST). Washington, DC: NASA.
Greg, P., Anupa, B., & Dwight, S. (2007). The Ares I abort failure detection, notification, and response system: An overview of the development process. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
Johnson, S. B. (2013). Goal-function tree Modeling for systems engineering and fault management. Reston, VA: AIAA.
Sanford, F., Alan, M., & Steiner, R. (2015). A practical guide to SysML: The systems Modeling language. Needham, MA: Object Management Group.
Data link basics: The link budget. L3 Technologies, New York.
Medina-Pazmiño, W., Jara-Olmedo, A., & Valencia-Redrován, D. (2016). Analysis and determination of minimum requirements for a data link communication system for unmanned aerial vehicles. In 2016 IEEE Ecuador technical chapters meeting (ETCM).
Steve, H. (2008). Unmanned aircraft system control and ATC communications bandwidth requirements. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gethers, M., Thomas, D. (2019). A Method for Robust Requirements Definition. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_30
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00113-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00114-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)