Skip to main content

A Method for Robust Requirements Definition

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems Engineering in Context
  • 783 Accesses

Abstract

This paper describes the implementation of the goal-function tree (GFT) for an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in a Systems Modeling Language (SysML) environment which tracks nominal and off-nominal goals for a successful flight for a UAV. The utility of the GFT allows for traceability of the system’s goals and requirements to perform a successful mission scenario. Definition of nominal goals reduces ambiguity about mission success and can be followed more easily by the customer. Furthermore, the goal-function tree can also track and implement corrections if the measurements for success are deviating through the use of off-nominal functions. The GFT’s off-nominal functions create a new set of functions and goals which attempt to mitigate a failing attribute instead of the other methods which only defined failure. This methodology creates a set of procedures for an operator or system when action is needed, thereby identifying more robust requirements as compared to traditional requirements development based only on nominal mission scenarios. The advantage of the SysML environment allows the legible traceability of the overlapping of goals of various structural and behavioral system objects, the execution of functions, and implementation of stereotypes which classifies the interactions between objects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnson, S. (2011). System health management: With aerospace applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Sage, A. (2016). Systems engineering: Analysis, design, and development. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sussman, G. J. (2007). Building robust systems an essay. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas, D. (2007). Selected systems engineering process deficiencies and their consequences. Acta Astronautica, 61(1–6), 406–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (1999). Mars climate orbiter mishap investigation board phase I report. Washington, DC: NASA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2013). Space launch system program (SLSP) integrated mission and fault management (M&FM) design analysis and performance assessment volume 2: SLS goal tree/success tree (GT/ST). Washington, DC: NASA.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greg, P., Anupa, B., & Dwight, S. (2007). The Ares I abort failure detection, notification, and response system: An overview of the development process. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, S. B. (2013). Goal-function tree Modeling for systems engineering and fault management. Reston, VA: AIAA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanford, F., Alan, M., & Steiner, R. (2015). A practical guide to SysML: The systems Modeling language. Needham, MA: Object Management Group.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Data link basics: The link budget. L3 Technologies, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Medina-Pazmiño, W., Jara-Olmedo, A., & Valencia-Redrován, D. (2016). Analysis and determination of minimum requirements for a data link communication system for unmanned aerial vehicles. In 2016 IEEE Ecuador technical chapters meeting (ETCM).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Steve, H. (2008). Unmanned aircraft system control and ATC communications bandwidth requirements. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gethers, M., Thomas, D. (2019). A Method for Robust Requirements Definition. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics