Skip to main content

Candidate Architecture for an Active Orbital Space Debris Removal System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems Engineering in Context

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on the application of systems engineering tools and techniques to the growing problem of orbital debris, with a focus on how to reduce this growing threat to space travel. The world’s space agencies have historically treated the orbital space as an infinite open sky where there was no concern about how much debris a rocket or satellite would produce during launch and the end of life of the satellite. Thus, not much thought has been put into how to keep the debris down to an acceptable level and no thought, until recently (~10 years), has been given to cleaning up the debris. This philosophy has been short-sighted and thus a failure. Using system engineering tools, such as the novelty/technology/complexity/pace framework, to analyze some of the previous approaches to this complex problem, we have developed and recommend an end-to-end approach to reducing and recycling orbital debris. This is reflected in a new architecture to enable effective and affordable removal of orbital debris. This architecture succeeds where others have failed due to the end-to-end philosophy, where considerations about debris potential and reuse/recycle are introduced early in any launch program. Requirements for on-orbit reuse of raw material can be accomplished using techniques such as additive manufacturing, centrifugal material separation, and induction heating. This paper demonstrates that an end-to-end architecture along with the application of technology from other areas outside the traditional space field will lead to an ability to reduce and reuse orbital debris.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Felder, W. N. (2013). A framework for verification and validation of complex aerospace systems. In 2013 aviation technology, integration, and operations conference. Los Angeles, CA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anz-Meador, P. (2016, April). Top Ten Satellite Breakups Reevaluated. In: Orbital Debris Quarterly News (Vol. 20, 1&2, pp. 5–6).

    Google Scholar 

  3. NASA. (2010). [Online]. http://unifiedpoptheory.com/nasa-releases-space-junk-ibook-about-orbital-debris-management-and-risk-mitigation/orbital_debris_1960_2010/

  4. Shenhar, A. J. (2001). One size does not fit all projects: Exploring classical contingency domains. Management Science, 47(3), 394–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sauser, B. J. (2006). A return to the moon: A system engineering management framework and the success of lunar prospector. In Systems research forum (Vol. 1, pp. 27–33). Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sauser, B. J., Reilly, R. R., & Shenhar, A. J. (2009). Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights–a comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars climate orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 665–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. NASA. (2012). NASA-STD 8719.14 revision A with change 1. NASA-STD-8719.14A.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, N. L., Hoffman, E., & Forsgren, R. (2012). Orbital Debris Management & Risk Mitigation. Washington, DC: NASA Academy of Program/Project & Engineering Leadership (APPEL).

    Google Scholar 

  9. IMDA. IMDA [Online]. http://imda.org.il/English/Defenses/defense_System.asp?missileId=30

  10. Broad, W. J. (2006, July 30). U.S. and Israel shelved laser as a defense. New York: The New Your Times.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn, B. D. (2016). Materials and processes for spacecraft and high reliability applications (p. 667). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nayak, M., Beck, J., & Udrea, B. (2013). Design of relative motion and attitude profiles for three-dimensional resident space object imaging with a laser rangefinder. In 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference (pp. 1–6). Big Sky, MT: IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anonymous. (1981, July). Space Debris: An AIAA Position Paper. AIAA Technical Committee on Space Systems.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rastislav Hronco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hronco, R., Felder, W.N. (2019). Candidate Architecture for an Active Orbital Space Debris Removal System. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics