Skip to main content

Evolutionary Development: A Universal Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Evolution, Development and Complexity

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

This paper offers a general systems definition of the phrase “evolutionary development” and an introduction to its application to autopoetic (self-reproducing) complex systems, including the universe as a system. Evolutionary development, evo devo or ED, is a term that can be used by philosophers, scientists, historians, and others as a replacement for the more general term “evolution,” whenever a scholar thinks experimental, selectionist, stochastic, and contingent or “evolutionary” processes, and also convergent, statistically deterministic (probabilistically predictable), or “developmental” processes, including replication, may be simultaneously contributing to selection and adaptation in any complex system, including the universe as a system.

Like living systems, our universe broadly exhibits both contingent and deterministic components, in all historical epochs and at all levels of scale. It has a definite birth and it is inevitably senescing toward heat death. The idea that we live in an “evo devo universe,” one that has self-organized over past replications both to generate multilocal evolutionary variation (experimental diversity) and to convergently develop and pass to future generations selected aspects of its accumulated complexity (“intelligence”), is an obvious hypothesis. Yet today, few cosmologists or physicists, even among theorists of universal replication and the multiverse, have entertained the hypothesis that our universe may be both evolving and developing (engaging in both unpredictable experimentation and goal-driven, teleological, directional change and a replicative life cycle), as in living systems. Our models of universal replication, like Lee Smolin’s cosmological natural selection (CNS), do not yet use the concept of universal development, or refer to development literature.

I will argue that some variety of evo devo universe models must emerge in coming years, including models of CNS with Intelligence (CNSI), which explore the ways emergent intelligence can be expected to constrain and direct “natural” selection, as it does in living systems. Evo devo models are one of several early approaches to an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis (EES), one that explores adaptation in both living and nonliving replicators. They have much to offer as a general approach to adaptive complexity, and may be required to understand several important phenomena under current research, including galaxy formation, the origin of life, the fine-tuned universe hypothesis, possible Earthlike and life fecundity in astrobiology, convergent evolution, the future of artificial intelligence, and our own apparent history of unreasonably smooth and resilient acceleration of both total and “leading edge” adapted complexity and intelligence growth, even under frequent and occasionally extreme past catastrophic selection events. If they are to become better validated in living systems and in nonliving adaptive replicators, including stars, prebiotic chemistry, and the universe as a system, they will require both better simulation capacity and advances in a variety of theories, which I shall briefly review.

Support: No institutional support or grant was used for this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adami, Chris (2016) What is Information? Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A 374(2063)20150230.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Fred C. (2008) Stars in Other Universes: Stellar structure with different fundamental constants, arXiv:0807.3697 [astro-ph].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, A.M., Zenil, H., Davies, P.C.W., and Walker, S.I. (2016) Formal Definitions of Unbounded Evolution and Innovation Reveal Universal Mechanisms for Open-Ended Evolution in Dynamical Systems (preprint, ArXiv.org).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre, Anthony (2016) Why There is “Something” rather than “Nothing”, Interview by Lawrence Kuhn for Closer to Truth (YouTube, 4 min).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, Wallace (2000) The Origin of Animal Body Plans: A Study in Evolutionary Developmental Biology, Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aunger, Robert (2007a) Major transitions in ‘big’ history, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(8):1137–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2007b) A rigorous periodization of ‘big’ history, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(8):1164–1178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, John D. and Tipler, Frank (1986) The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, John D. et al. (2008) Fitness of the Cosmos for Life: Biochemistry and Fine-Tuning, Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bejan, A. and Errera, M.R. (2017) Wealth inequality: The physics basis. J. Applied Physics 121(12):124903.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bejan, A. and Zane, J.P. (2013) Design in Nature: How the Constructal Law Governs Evolution in Biology, Physics, Technology, and Social Organizations, Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhullar, B-A.S. (2017) Evolution: Catastrophe triggers diversification, Nature 542:304–305.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2002) Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. and Ćirković, M.M. (Eds.) (2008) Global Catastrophic Risks, 1st Edition, Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgine, P. and Stewart, J. (2004) Autopoiesis and Cognition, Artificial Life 10: 327–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, Dennis (2011) Wetware: A Computer in Every Living Cell, Yale U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brin, David (1983) The ‘Great Silence’: the Controversy Concerning Extraterrestrial Intelligent Life, Q.J.R. Astr. Soc. 24:283–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callebaut, Werner and Rasskin-Gutman, Diego (2005) Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calude, Cristian S. and Jürgensen, Helmut (2005) Is complexity a source of incompleteness? Advances in Applied Math 35(2005)1–15.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Sean B. (2005) Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo, Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Sean M. (2016) The Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself, Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Brandon (1974) Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology. IAU Symposium 63, Reidel. pp. 291–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaitin, Gregory J. (1992) Information-Theoretic Incompleteness, World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaisson, Eric (2001) Cosmic Evolution: The Rise of Complexity in Nature, Harvard U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ćirković, M.M. (2009) Fermi’s Paradox – The Last Challenge for Copernicanism? Serbian Astronomical Journal 178, 1–20.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ćirković, M.M., Sandberg, A., and Bostrom, N. (2010) Anthropic Shadow: Observation Selection Effects and Human Extinction Risks, Risk Analysis 30:1495–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausius, Rudolf (1851) On the Moving Force of Heat, and the Laws regarding the Nature of Heat itself which are deducible therefrom, London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 4th. 2(VIII):1–21;102–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, August (1844) Discours sur l’Esprit Positif [A General View of Positivism], Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway-Morris, Simon (1998) The Crucible of Creation: The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals, Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2004) Life’s Solution: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe, Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2015) The Runes of Evolution, Templeton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corning, Peter A. and Szathmáry, Eörs (2015) “Synergistic selection”: A Darwinian frame for the evolution of complexity. J. Theoretical Biology 371(2015)45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corning, Peter A. (2018) Synergistic Selection: How Cooperation has Shaped Evolution and the Rise of Humankind, World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, L. (1994) Possible Implications of the Quantum Theory of Gravity: An Introduction to the Meduso-Anthropic Principle (PDF). Foundations of Science Preprint 1994, no. Special Issue of the First Conference on the Evolution and Development of the Universe (EDU-2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutchfield, J.P. and van Nimwegen, E. (2002) The Evolutionary Unfolding of Complexity. In: Evolution as Computation, Landweber L.F., Winfree E. (Eds.), Natural Computing Series, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dartnell, Lewis (2014) The Knowledge: How to Rebuild Our World from Scratch, Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles (1859) (On) The Origin of Species (by Means of Natural Selection), John Murray Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Paul (2010) The Eerie Silence: Renewing Our Search for Alien Intelligence, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Steven J. (1996) The Biological Universe: The Extraterrestrial Life Debate and the Limits of Science, Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, D.T.F., Thomson, A.R., and White, J.H. (2008) How much of protein sequence space has been explored by life on Earth?, J. R. Soc. Interface 5:953–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, Albert (1915) Die Feldgleichungen der Gravitation (The Field Equations of Gravitation), Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 844–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Gould, S.J. (1972) Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism, In: Models in Paleobiology, T.M. Schopf (ed.), Freeman & Cooper, pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G.F.R. (2015) Recognising Top-Down Causation, in A. Aguirre et al. (Eds.) Questioning the Foundations of Physics, Springer, pp. 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G.F.R., Noble, D., and O’Connor, T. (2012) Top-down causation: an integrating theme within and across the sciences?, Interface Focus 2:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischler, Martin A. and Firschein, Oscar (1987) Intelligence: The Eye, the Brain, and the Computer, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flack, Jessica (2017) Life’s Information Hierarchy. In: From Matter to Life: Information and Causality, Walker, Sara I. et al. (Eds.), Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Martinez, Claudio L. (2014) SETI in the light of cosmic convergent evolution. Acta Astronautica 104(1):341–349.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2017) Introducing Biomimomics: Combining Biomimetics and Comparative Genomics for Constraining Organismal and Technological Complexity. In: Mangan M. et al. (Eds.) Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems: Proceedings of Living Machines 2017, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgan, D., Dayal, P., Cockell, C., and Libeskind, N. (2017) Evaluating galactic habitability using high-resolution cosmological simulations of galaxy formation, International Journal of Astrobiology 16:60–73.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Forward, Robert L. (1980) Dragon’s Egg, Del Rey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Andy and Conlon, Joseph P. (2013) Cosmological natural selection and the purpose of the universe, Complexity 18:48–56.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, James (2003) Biocosm: A New Scientific Theory of Evolution, Inner Ocean Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2007) The Intelligent Universe: AI, ET, and the Emerging Mind of the Cosmos, New Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgiev, Georgi Y. et al. (2015) Mechanism of organization increase in complex systems, Complexity 21(2)18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart, John C. and Kirschner, Marc W. (2005) The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma, Yale U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2007) The theory of facilitated variation, PNAS 104 Suppl 1:8582–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S.F., Bosch, T.C.G., and Ledón-Rettig, C. (2015) Eco-Evo-Devo: Developmental symbiosis and developmental plasticity as evolutionary agents, Nature Reviews Genetics 16(10):611–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, Kurt (1931) On formally undecidable propositions of Principia. Mathematica and related systems (German), Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik, 38(1)173–198.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Jay T. et al. (2014) Alternative Chemistries of Life: Empirical Approaches, NASA/NSF Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen J. (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Harvard U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, Harvard U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haken, Hermann (1984) The Science of Structure: Synergetics, Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Brian K. (Ed.) (2003) Environment, Development, and Evolution, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Edward R. (1995) The Natural Selection of Universes Containing Intelligent Life (PDF). Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 36(3)193–203.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Lawrence J. (1913) The Fitness of the Environment: An Inquiry into the Biological Significance of the Properties of Matter, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylighen, Francis (2007) The Global Superorganism: an evolutionary-cybernetic model of the emerging network society. Web published manuscript. Retrieved from: http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/Superorganism.pdf

  • ——— (2008) Accelerating socio-technological evolution: from ephemeralization and stigmergy to the Global Brain. In: Globalization as Evolutionary Process: Modeling Global Change, George Modelski, Tessaleno Devezas, and William R. Thompson (eds.), Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2016) Stigmergy as a Universal Coordination Mechanism. Cognitive Systems Research 38:4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, Fred (1954) On nuclear reactions occurring in very hot stars: the synthesis of the elements from carbon to nickel, Astrophysics Journal Suppl. 1:121–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1983) The Intelligent Universe: A New View of Creation and Evolution, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, Eva and Lamb, Marion J. (1995) Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: the Lamarckian Dimension, Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski, D. (1986) Background and Mass Extinctions: The Alternation of Macroevolutionary Regimes, Science 231:129–133.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Lucia (2012) From Chemotaxis to the Cognitive Map: The function of olfaction. PNAS, 109(1):10693–10700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, Erich (1980) The Self-Organizing Universe: Scientific and Human Implications, Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Norman L. (2011) What a Developmental View Can Do for You. In: Thought Leader Forum, Michael J. Mouboussin (Ed.), Credit Suisse/First Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Jonathan (2008) The end of the adaptive landscape metaphor? Biol Philos 23:625–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, Stuart (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koonin, Eugene V. (2007) The cosmological model of eternal inflation and the transition from chance to biological evolution in the history of life. Biology Direct 2:15–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz, M.R. and McKee, C.F. (2005) A general theory of turbulence-regulated star formation, from spirals to ultraluminous infrared galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal 630:250–268.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, Ray (1999) The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2005) The Singularity is Near, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laland, Kevin et al. (2015) The extended evolutionary synthesis: Its structure, assumptions and predictions, Proceedings of the Royal Society B282:20151019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Nick (2016) The Vital Question, W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, Pierre-Simon (1812) Theorie analytique des probabilites (A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities), Translated from the fifth French edition of 1825 with Notes by the Translator, Andrew I. Dale, Springer-Verlag, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lem, Stanislaw (1971) The New Cosmogony, In: A Perfect Vacuum (trans. by M. Kandel), Northwestern U. Press, 1999, pp. 197–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, Gottfried (1686) The Discourse on Metaphysics (Fr: Discours de métaphysique).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, John and Kuhn, Robert L. (2013) The Mystery of Existence: Why Is There Anything At All?, Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, Simon A. (1998) Ecosystems and the Biosphere as Complex Adaptive Systems, Ecosystems 1:431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G.F. and Barnes, L.A. (2016) A Fortunate Universe: Life in a Finely Tuned Cosmos, Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightman, Alan (2011) The Accidental Universe, Harpers, Dec 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lineweaver, Charles H., Fenner, Y., and Gibson, B.K. (2004) The Galactic Habitable Zone and the Age Distribution of Complex Life in the Milky Way, Science 303(5654):59–62.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Linde, Andrei D. (1992) Stochastic approach to tunneling and baby universe formation, Nuclear Physics B 372:421–442.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lobkovsky, A.E. and Koonin, E.V. (2012) Replaying the tape of life: quantification of the predictability of evolution, Frontiers in Genetics 3:246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Konrad (1977) Behind the Mirror: A Search for a Natural History of Human Knowledge, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Losos, Johnathan B. (2017) Improbable Destinies: Fate, Chance, and the Future of Evolution, Riverhead Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, A.A. (2016) Contingency, convergence and hyper-astronomical numbers in biological evolution, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 58:107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J.R. (1961) Minds, Machines and Gödel. Philosophy 36:112–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (2002/2013) Introduction to Systems Theory, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luisi, Pier L. (2003) Autopoiesis: a review and a reappraisal. Naturwissenschaften 90 49–59.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, Michael S. (2012) The Guardian of All Things: The Epic Story of Human Memory, St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariscal, Carlos (2016) Universal biology: assessing universality from a single example, In: The Impact of Discovering Life beyond Earth, Steven J. Dick (ed.), Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Joseph D. (2013) Is the Contingentist/Inevitabilist Debate a Matter of Degrees? Philosophy of Science 80(5):919–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1973/1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of The Living, D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1987) The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee, George R. (2011) Convergent Evolution: Limited Forms Most Beautiful, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, T.C.B. (2015) Are there ergodic limits to evolution? Ergodic exploration of genome space and convergence, Interface Focus 5:41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, Ulf-G. (2013) Life on earth – An accident? Chiral symmetry and the anthropic principle, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, James G. (1978) Living Systems, McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, John (1995) Self-Producing Systems. Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, Hans (1979) Today’s Computers, Intelligent Machines, and Our Future. Analog Science Fiction and Fact, Feb 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Gerd B. and Newman, Stuart A. (Eds.) (2003) The Origination of Organismal Form: Beyond the Gene in Developmental and Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munitz, Milton K. (1987) Cosmic Understanding: Philosophy and Science of the Universe, Princeton U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, Robert A. (2009) Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Isaac (1687) The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Daniel Adee, 1846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, Denis (2017) Evolution viewed from physics, physiology and medicine. Interface Focus 7(5):20160159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, Raymond and Noble, Denis (2017) Was the Watchmaker Blind? Or Was She One-Eyed? Biology 6(4):47 (Special Issue: Biology in the Early 21st Century: Evolution Beyond Selection).

    Google Scholar 

  • Odling-Smee, John et al. (2003) Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution, Princeton U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogura A., Kazuho, I., and Gojobori, T. (2004) Comparative analysis of gene expression for convergent evolution of camera eye between octopus and human. Genome Research 14:1555–1561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M.A. and Powell, R. (2016) Major problems in evolutionary transitions: how a metabolic perspective can enrich our understanding of macroevolution, Biology and Philosophy 31:159–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oparin, Alexander I. (1968) Genesis and Evolutionary Development of Life, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgogozo, V. (2015) Replaying the tape of life in the twenty-first century, Interface Focus 5:57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paley, William (1802) Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, John Morgan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, T. (2012) Convergence and Parallelism in Evolution: A Neo-Gouldian Account, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 63:429–448.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Piel, Gerard (1972) The Acceleration of History, Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M (2007) Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis?, Evolution 61:2743–2749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci, M. and Müller, G.B. (Eds.) (2010) Evolution: The Extended Synthesis, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven (2010) The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Andrew (2003) In the Blink of an Eye, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. (2012) Convergent evolution and the limits of natural selection, Euro. J. Phil. Sci. 2:355–373.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, R. and Mariscal, C. (2015) Convergent evolution as natural experiment: the tape of life reconsidered, Interface Focus 5:40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohorille, Andrew (2012) Processes that Drove the Transition from Chemistry to Biology: Concepts and Evidence. Origins of Life 42(5)429–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poundstone, William (1985) The Recursive Universe: Cosmic Complexity and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge, William Morrow & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Michael (2017) Entropy and selection: Life as an adaptation for universe replication (PDF). Complexity, Article ID 4745379, 4 pages, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4745379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pross, Addy (2014) What is Life? How Chemistry Becomes Biology, Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raff, Rudolf (1996) The Shape of Life: Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form, U. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, Georgia (2017) Evolutionary Innovation as a Global Catastrophic Risk, Presentation at EA Global 2017, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, Martin (1999) Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape Our Universe, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2001) Our Cosmic Habitat, Princeton U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2015) Post-human evolution on Earth and beyond. Presented at Exploring Exoplanets: The Search for Extraterrestrial Life and Post Biological Intelligence, John Templeton Foundation conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Robert G.B. (2007) Biological Emergences: Evolution by Natural Experiment, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein, Melissa G. et al. (2012) Risk of Stillbirth and Infant Death Stratified by Gestational Age, Obstet Gynecol 120(1):76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Cathy M. (2006) Retrieved from Epicofevolution.com/biological-evolution, 27 Mar 2017.

  • Russell, D. A. and Séguin, R. (1982) Reconstructions of the small Cretaceous theropod Stenonychosaurus inequalis and a hypothetical dinosauroid. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada, National Museum of Natural Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan, Carl (1977) The Dragons of Eden: Speculations on the Evolution of Human Intelligence, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1980) Cosmos, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, Stanley M. (1985) Evolving Hierarchical Systems, Columbia U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1993) Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2010) Development (and evolution) of the universe. In: The Evolution and Development of the Universe, C. Vidal (ed.), Foundations of Science 15:357–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2012) Hierarchical structures, Axiomathes 22:355–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. and Hufford, L. (Eds.) (1996) Homoplasy: The Recurrence of Similarity in Evolution, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, G. and Wagner, G.P. (Eds.) (2004) Modularity in Development and Evolution, U. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, James A. (2011) Evolution: A View From the 21st Century, FT Press Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signor, P.W. and Lipps, J.H. (1982) Sampling bias, gradual extinction patterns, and catastrophes in the fossil record, In: Geological implications of impacts of large asteroids and comets on the Earth, L.T. Silver and P.H. Schultz (Eds.), Geological Society of America Special Publication, 190:291–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, John M. (2000) The developmental singularity hypothesis (DSH), AccelerationWatch.com. Retrieved from: Accelerationwatch.com/developmentalsinghypothesis.html, 29 Jan 2018.

  • ——— (2002) Understanding STEM compression in universal change, AccelerationWatch.com. Retrieved from: Accelerationwatch.com/mest.html, 29 Jan 2018.

  • ——— (2008) Evo Devo Universe? A Framework for Speculations on Cosmic Culture. In: Cosmos and Culture: Cultural Evolution in a Cosmic Context, Steven J. Dick, Mark L. Lupisella (Eds.), NASA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2012) The transcension hypothesis: Sufficiently advanced civilizations invariably leave our universe, and implications for METI and SETI, Acta Astronautica 78:55–68.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2015) Humanity rising: Why evolutionary developmentalism will inherit the future, World Future Review 7(2–3):116–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2016a) Portals (funnels, bottlenecks) and convergent evolution. In: The Foresight Guide. Retrieved from Foresightguide.com/portals-funnels-bottlenecks-and-convergent-evolution, 20 Jan 2018.

  • ——— (2016b) The great race to inner space. In: The Foresight Guide. Retrieved from: Foresightguide.com/the-great-race-to-inner-space-our-surprising-future/, 28 Mar 2017.

  • ——— (2017a) The VCRIS model of natural selection. In: The Foresight Guide. Retrieved from: Foresightguide.com/the-vcris-model-of-natural-selection-evolutionary-development-of-adaptive-complexity, 6 Jun 2018.

  • ——— (2017b) Five goals of complex systems. In: The Foresight Guide. Retrieved from: Foresightguide.com/five-goals-of-complex-systems, 30 Dec 2017.

  • ——— (2018) Catalytic catastrophes: Advancing the five goals. In: The Foresight Guide. Retrieved from: Foresightguide.com/catalytic-catastrophes-how-right-sized-catastrophes-advance-the-five-goals/, 20 Jan 2018.

  • Smith, Eric and Morowitz, Harold J. (2004) Universality in intermediary metabolism, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101:13168–13173.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2016) The Origin and Nature of Life on Earth, Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin, Lee (1992) Did the Universe Evolve? Classical and Quantum Gravity 9:173–191.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1997) The Life of the Cosmos, Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2004) Cosmological natural selection as the explanation for the complexity of the universe. Physica A 340:705–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2006) The status of cosmological natural selection. arXiv:hep-th/0612185v1.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2012) Scientific Approaches to the Fine-Tuning Problem, The Nature of Reality, Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert (1864) Illustrations of Universal Progress: A Series of Discussions, D. Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Edward J. (1981) Somatic Selection and Adaptive Evolution: On the Inheritance of Acquired Characters, 2nd Ed., U. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1998) Lamarck’s Signature: How retrogenes are changing the natural selection paradigm, Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenger, Victor J. (2011) The Fallacy of Fine-Tuning: Why the Universe is Not Designed for Us, Prometheus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, Leonard (2006) The Cosmic Landscape, Back Bay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, Rod (1992) “Galileo, Babel, and Autopoiesis (It’s Turtles All The Way Down)”. Int. J. General Systems 21 (2): 267–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, Nicholas (2012) Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder, Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre (1955) The Phenomenon of Man, Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, Valentin (1977) The Phenomenon of Science, Columbia U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D.D. (2011) Gould’s replay revisited, Biology and Philosophy 26:65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, Neal D. (2006) The Perimeter of Ignorance, Presentation at: Beyond Belief Conference, Nov 5–7, 2006, YouTube (41 mins).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaas, Rüdiger (1998) Is there a Darwinian evolution of the cosmos? In: Proceedings of the MicroCosmos-MacroCosmos Conference, Aachen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela F.J., Maturana, H.R., and Uribe, R. (1974) Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterization and a model, Biosystems 5(4):187–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, Jos (2003) Discovering Evolutionary Principles through Comparative Morphology, Adonis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeij, Geerat J. (1987) Evolution and Escalation, Princeton U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2006) Historical contingency and the purported uniqueness of evolutionary innovations, PNAS 103:1804–1809.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2009) Nature: an economic history, Princeton U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, Clement (2008a) The future of scientific simulations: from artificial life to artificial cosmogenesis (PDF). In: Death and Anti-Death 6: Thirty Years After Kurt Gödel (1906–1978).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2010) Computational and biological analogies for understanding fine-tuned parameters in physics (PDF). Foundations of Science 15(4):375–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2016) Stellivore Extraterrestrials? Binary Stars as Living Systems (PDF). Acta Astronautica 128:251–56.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vilenkin, Alexander (2006) Many Worlds In One: The Search for Other Universes, Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volk, Tyler (2003) Gaia’s Body: Toward a Physiology of Earth, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2017) Quarks to Culture: How We Came to Be, Columbia U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Gunther (2003) Hox cluster duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties, PNAS 100(25):14603–14606.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagman and Stephens (2004) Surprising ‘ultra-conserved’ regions discovered in human genome. UCSC Currents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Sara I. et al. (Eds.) (2017) From Matter to Life: Information and Causality, Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Stephen (2015) Where is Everybody? Seventy-Five Solutions to the Fermi Paradox and the Problem of Extraterrestrial Life, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Steven (2007) “Living in the Multiverse”, In: Universe or Multiverse? B. Carr (ed.), Cambridge U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Geoffrey (2017) Scale: The Universal Laws of Growth, Innovation, Sustainability, and the Pace of Life in Organisms, Cities, Economies, and Companies, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, Mary Jane (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution, Oxford U. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, John A. (1977) Genesis and observership, In: Foundational Problems in the Special Sciences, R. E. Butts and J. Hintikka, (Eds.), D. Reidel, pp. 3–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1988) World as system self-synthesized by quantum networking, IBM Journal of Research and Development 32:4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigner, Eugene (1960) The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Comm. on Pure and Applied Math., 13(1):1–14.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2008b), and Smart, John M. and Vidal, Clement (2008–2017). Cosmological natural selection (fecund universes). EvoDevoUniverse.com wiki.

  • Wikipedia (2012), and Smart John M. and Chattergee, Atanu (2012–2017). List of examples of convergent evolution. EvoDevoUniverse.com wiki.

  • Wilkins, Adam S. (2001) The Evolution of Developmental Pathways, Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sewall (1932) The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress on Genetics. pp. 355–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, Hong et al. (2010) Gene expression atlas for human embryogenesis. FASEB Journal 24(9):3341–3350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, Carl (2015) A Planet of Viruses, 2nd Edition, U. Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Evo Devo Universe co-directors Clement Vidal, Georgi Yordanov Georgiev, Michael Price, and Claudio Flores-Martinez for helpful critiques. Special thanks go to EDU member Milan Ćirković who offered extensive constructive feedback on the earliest version of this paper. Thanks also to Anthony Aguirre, John Leslie, Denis Noble, Rüdiger Vaas and Tyler Volk for key insights, and to Carlos Gershenson and the CCS committee for approving our satellite on Evolution, Development, and Complexity at CCS2017, where these and other ideas were discussed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Smart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Smart, J.M. (2019). Evolutionary Development: A Universal Perspective. In: Georgiev, G., Smart, J., Flores Martinez, C., Price, M. (eds) Evolution, Development and Complexity. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00075-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics